• danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The skeptic in me says democrats love not being in power cause they don’t have to be responsible for what actually happens.

    • praechaox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep, exactly. I remember seeing many warnings in 2021-22 saying that then was the right time to pack the courts. Establishment Dems twiddled their thumbs while insisting that everyone everywhere needs to follow proper decorum and procedure. And now look what happened with the string of terrible Supreme Court decisions.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact that the US has to ‘pack the courts’ to get anything through shows how broken the system is.

        Not that any other country is better but still, you’d think judges should be impartial and resistant to influence, and yet you get Clarence offering up his chocolate starfish for a vacation in a warm climate

  • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    PACK THE FUCKING COURT! You’re in that office to serve the people not the fucking system. Doesn’t matter anyway republicans are going to destroy everything they can get their hands on.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, why would you try to actually solve a problem instead of just applying a band-aid that the next administration can rip of again (by incresing the size of the court again)?

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Every solution that works within the system would be a band-aid. The entire system is band-aids. The government set up by a group of wealthy white men almost 250 years ago for a population 130 times smaller than it is now simply does not and cannot work in today’s world.

  • daikiki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just pack the goddamn court. There’s ONE conservative justice on the Supreme Court who was appointed by a president who came to power having received more votes than his opponent, and that’s Clarence Thomas, the man whose loyalties can be bought with a luxury vacation and whose wife aided and abetted insurrectionist traitors.

    The ENTIRE conservative wing of the Supreme Court is illegitimate. Every single one of them. And you know what? Thanks to the GOP, it only takes 50 votes to approve a supreme court justice. It used to be sixty, but they changed the rules so they could more conveniently destroy America.

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Easier than a constitutional amendment, but it still requires 60 votes in the senate to expand the number of justices in the court.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Incomplete and out of context sentiment, recommended reading here: https://www.historicalmaterialism.org/nietzsche-in-his-time-the-struggle-against-socratism-and-socialism/

      In addition to its critical analysis of Nietzsche’s philosophy, The Aristocratic Rebel presents readers with a distinctive window into nineteenth century liberal thought, showing how Nietzsche held deep sympathies with liberal thinkers of his time and indeed forged much of his thought in line with many liberal ideals. Situating Nietzsche in the political context of his time helps readers to locate and bring Nietzsche to life in our present day when the debates between liberal and socialist conceptions of justice, equality and emancipation remain ever pertinent questions.

      Some more context:

      What made Nietzsche’s reactionary political views sympathetic to liberalism were their mutual disdain for socialist leveling and equality. This similarity led Nietzsche to endorse many of the same pro-imperial and anti-egalitarian sentiments that liberals of his time adopted. We must read Nietzsche’s political thought in the wake of the Napoleonic conquests of Germany for which the German liberal establishment agreed that the influence of the French ideals of egalitarianism and equality were foreign impositions on German culture, stripping it of its vitality

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The most amazing ideas always cones when the election draws close. But he can’t implement any of them because there is no time.

    Good thing Biden already fulfilled his previous election promises. Student loans are a thing of the past.

  • Scroll Responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Make every US citizen a Supreme Court justice when they turn 18. There’s nothing in the constitution that says you can’t do that. Put cases up to popular vote every year or two. Also, whatever law passed to do this would count as senate approval because who’s going to strike it down… the Supreme Court?

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This meme is great but it drives me crazy. There are certainly multiple eligibility requirements to play on a school basketball team, including age and being a registered student, which would prevent a dog from qualifying.

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There is that basketball court that’s on top of the Supreme Court…does that mean another Air Bud sequel but this time he’s a justice?

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is hilarious. I’m sure someone with more bandwidth than me can point out a dozen reasons why this is bad, but fuck if it isn’t funny and appealing.

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You mean conservatives, but I agree. Our less-fascist conservative party doesn’t like to even attempt too much progress; it would upset their owners.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You mean conservatives

          Incrementalists believe in doing as little as possible and would do nothing if they thought they could get away with it. Conservatives believe in fascism and will implement it as quickly as we let them. Incrementalists believe in letting them.

    • shottymcb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Requires an act of congress and elimination of the filibuster. Not possible with the current makeup of the Senate. Need more blue senators, which is hard because California gets the same number of Senators as North Dakota, which has the same population as a small apartment complex in LA.

      So we need record turnout for that. Vote.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Pack it, but better yet is to completely restructure it. The Constitution is extremely vague about what SCOTUS is. Just that it exists, its the highest court in the land, and Congress defines it.

  • Inferno@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hey Biden, why don’t you work on giving term limits for the house and Senate first And then work on term limits for the court.

    • Zyansheep@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Honesty kinda conflicted on representative term limits. Longer term people can be out of touch, but they also have a lot of experience and know how to collaborate to get laws passed 🤔

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think congress critters should be seated and dormed together by state, not by party. They would be less vile towards each other. Think of the pizza parties!

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      And if they’re going to do that, they should add all federally elected or appointed people. If you hit the federal retirement age during your term, you’re ineligible to run again. For SCOTUS, if you hit it, you begin the process to step down while a replacement is vetted and approved.