• LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not an American, but increasing SC members would seem like a good thing to do. The more people on it, the harder it is to stack.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The number of SCOTUS justices is set by law. The President can’t* appoint more without Congress passing a law adding more.

      *Of course, that was before they ruled that Presidents are totally immune from any prosecution, so who the fuck knows now.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The number of SCOTUS justices is set by law.

        This is false, there is no law stipulating the number of justices. There have been as few as 6 before, and we could have easily increased that to 23 during the first 2 years of Biden’s presidency if Dems were interested in preserving justice and willing to remove the filibuster.

        • CriticalThought@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not sure why you believe this is false? From https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx : “Who decides how many Justices are on the Court?: The Constitution places the power to determine the number of Justices in the hands of Congress. The first Judiciary Act, passed in 1789, set the number of Justices at six, one Chief Justice and five Associates. Over the years Congress has passed various acts to change this number, fluctuating from a low of five to a high of ten. The Judiciary Act of 1869 fixed the number of Justices at nine and no subsequent change to the number of Justices has occurred.”

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh I see, I think it was a misunderstanding. I just meant there’s no law stipulating a particular number. Perhaps the OP could have said it better that it’s “set by Congress,” and they did correctly point out Congress can change it further.