White House levy to protect US makers from cheap imports likely to inflame trade tensions

The US president, Joe Biden, has announced a 100% tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles as part of a package of measures designed to protect US manufacturers from cheap imports.

In a move that is likely to inflame trade tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, the White House said it was imposing more stringent curbs on Chinese goods worth $18bn.

Sources said the move followed a four-year review and was a preventive measure designed to stop cheap subsidised Chinese goods flooding the US market and stifling the growth of the American green technology sector.

Despite the risks of retaliation from Beijing, Biden said the increased levies were a proportionate response to China’s overcapacity in the EV sector. Sources said China was producing 30m EVs a year but could sell only 22-23m domestically.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Simple way to make this policy make sense. Instead of a tariff on imports make it a huge subsidy on domestic EVs. We can give the military contractors billions, but giving the American people cheap cars is somehow a bad investment? Soon many positive side effects of a direct, non monetary stimulus

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Didn’t US companies that were making EV raise their prices as soon as the government added or increased buyer incentive rebates?

      The greedy assholes basically pocketed the rebate while the consumer got nothing.

      So IMO these manufacturers will just pocket a significant chunk of the subsidy and pass little of the savings on to the consumer. Already many of them claim financial woes, it’s no stretch for them to soak up the cash and say “but we had to…” and get no punishment because the administration doesn’t want to kill the industry it’s trying to support. I mean, $55bn pay packages have to come from somewhere, right?

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Make the subsidy based on current prices and only EVs that are X price or below qualify. There are solutions, we would just have to, I dunno, craft thoughtful legislation aimed at helping Americans and not companies? Sounds like a lot of work though…

        Or let me put it this way: do you think lawmakers write the laws they sign? Industry groups and lobbyists write the laws, lawmakers tweak them or just sign them.

        • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          This is what France is doing.

          The subsidy for EV is 27% of the price of the car with a maximum of 4000€. (+3000€ for people with low revenues).

          The cost of the car must be under 47000€, the car must weight less than 2400kg and it must have a low environmental impact during its production.

          The goal of this last rule is clearly to indirectly exclude cars produced in China. I think tariffs against a specific country is not possible in the European Union so French lawmakers had to come up with a creative solution to exclude Chinese cars.

    • Argongas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      AFIK, all the subsides for EVa in the US already require them to be made and produced domestically.

    • echutaa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s no incentive for US automakers to build cheaper EVs from this. This is just protectionism which is fine when China is subsidizing their production past the point of profitability, but this will still work against making American EVs more affordable.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The reason why you’re saving on Chinese cars is because of huge government subsidies on their side, so they don’t play by the rules of the free market either.

      • guacupado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s funny how everyone tries to make China subsidizing cars for its population a bad thing. The US should bet taking note. Taxes should be used to help the population, not the people in charge of the population.

      • Breve@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh, like the time in 2009 when the US government gave $81 billion dollars to the automotive industry? Or again in 2023 when Biden put $12 billion in incentives on the table for them to make EVs?

        • 3volver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nailed it. Sick and fucking tired of hearing the “oh China’s unfair subsidies blah blah” bullshit. The US has been doing the same thing, just we’ve had our futures sold to corporation’s profit margins.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That won’t make US made EV cheaper. China relies on what is basically slavery as well, if that’s what you want for US factory workers in order to be able to buy a car for cheap car then I think you don’t have your priorities straight…

          • steventrouble@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Uyghur slavery represents a very small fraction of Chinese labor. Yes, it is a human rights abuse and should absolutely be stopped, but bringing it up every time someone talks about a Chinese product with no known ties to slave labor is an anti-asian dogwhistle.

            China is a big place, with 10x as many people as in the U.S. Let’s try not to generalize about 3 billion people.

          • guacupado@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Tell me how much money the CEOs make then tell me how much worker wages have to do with how expensive the cars are.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              GM’s CEO makes 28m/year

              A drop in the bucket with their 170b in revenue

              Their factory workers make way over 20$/h, some make way over 50$/h.

              How much do you think Chinese factory workers get paid?

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                GM’s CEO makes 28m/year

                Looking back at the last 5 years, General Motors’s selling, general & admin expenses peaked in December 2023 at 9.656 billion.

                Selling, General & Admin Expenses For General Motors

                If you include the incentives across the entire business, rather than just fixating on a single employee, you discover a figure equal to around 5% of the $171B in gross revenues. It should be noted that even this is a conservative estimate, as General Motors licenses and contracts to third-party businesses with their own administrative expenses.

                How much do you think Chinese factory workers get paid?

                In the China versus US size stakes, it’s what you measure that counts

                This matters for the debate over which of the US or China has the larger economy because, measured at market exchange rates, US GDP is still around 40% larger than that of China. (See Chart 1.) But when measured at PPP exchange rates, China’s economy overtook that of the US in 2016 and is now about 20% bigger.

                Because of the cheap cost of living in China, their factory workers can earn less on paper and still live much higher on the hog. Often literally (Chinese consumers eat about 5kg more pork per capita than their American peers). But also in terms of home ownership rates (90% in China to 60% in America) and retirement age (54 in China compared to 59 in the US) and life expectancy (78 in China compared to 76 in the US).

                If you consult the Gini Index, the US and China are within 2 points of each other as of 2021.

                This is largely thanks to the big public works financed and administered by a unified national government. A relatively poor country can produce quality of life superior to the global leader simply by doing the old FDR style tax-and-spend tricks that put America at the front of the pack 80 years ago.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        huge government subsidies on their side

        China’s public education, public health care, public housing, and public mass transit: Evil Subsidies

        America’s $7500 tax credit: Sensible free market EV incentive

      • buzz86us@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The reason you’re saving on the running costs of a gas car is because of huge government subsidies on the fossil fuel industry.

      • Einstein@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, Our government could do the same thing to keep costs low and competitive instead of just making them more expensive for everyone.

          • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think what they’re saying is that both countries are subsidising the industries.

            Chinese companies are thinking ahead and using the subsidies to sell more vehicles

            American companies are, surprise-sur-fucking-surprise, stealing the subsidies to make a few billionaires richer

      • Brickardo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        In order to get subsidies, companies have to concur in public exams pitching their plans. It’s no different whatsoever from getting private funds somewhere else. Private funds are often obtained by way of being close friends with someone - which happens a lot in my country. If anything, getting government subsidies is proof that you have your act together.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nobody has ever played by the rules of the free market. It’s been a scam from day one.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      GM and Ford manufacture in China. It doesn’t affect American designed and Chinese produced vehicles, only companies that are based in China.

      • credo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        These “free market” arguments keep missing the key detail. Reading is hard.

        subsidised Chinese goods

        I don’t remember China subsidizing American products and then shipping them back to us.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          One funnels money into American business, the other into the Chinese government. It’s not some secret plan. It’s clearly declared.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Apple has been getting the hell out of building things in China — if you hadn’t noticed.

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    When China opens up it’s domestic market to international goods then the rest of the world should consider doing the same. Until then, match every barrier to entry.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re banning 25 year old kei trucks, they were definitely not gonna allow China to compete.

    God forbid we try to save the planet without making morbillions in shareholder value first.

    • Vytle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Electric cars will not save the planet, they will save the auto industry. Use a bike to get around whenever possible if you actually care.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As far as I know, the Feds aren’t banning Kei style trucks. But most states are banning them from road use. Since they do not meet highway safety standards. But that’s what makes the cheap - deleting all the safety equipment and being under powered. But you can still get as many as you like. And you are still welcome to drive them off road.

      • You999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The feds aren’t banning them but there’s a 25% tarrif on importing them because of the chicken tax tarrif.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        deleting all the safety equipment and being under powered

        That must be why those death traps regularly kill people in all of the countries where they’re regularly used!

        And even if that (crap) reason is why: ban them from the freeways, then, not from every fucking road. You know, like mopeds and similar small scooters?

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          First, the countries where they are popular tend to have limited higher speed roadways and the general population doesn’t want to own one anyway. And some countries simply do not care if you die in one. It is pretty hard to get seriously hurt of killed at 20mph speeds.

          Second, trying to legislate where people might drive those things will prove to be futile. We both know Bubba and Ken will think “it’s only a little ways” and try to get one of these those things up on a highway speed roadway in a grossly overloaded tiny little pickup. Only to be run over by an 80,000lbs semi or smacked in the rear-end by Karen in her Suburban doing 70 mph in a 50mph zone. This is probably a very good case where the rules banning them from roads are to protect people from their own stupidity.

          We kill enough people every year in the highly engineered for safety vehicles we already have. And besides, I have seen people drive and most of y’all shouldn’t.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or Mexico. And honestly I’m fine with that. Create some jobs outside of China for a change.

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        China has been pretty well known for bringing in their own workers on foreign construction projects. They’re unapologetically nation building. I could easily see them continue to do so with manufacturing.

        I wouldn’t be surprised to find out a majority of US cars are manufactured with Chinese parts. The US is absolutely not nation building. The rust belt has been exported and nobody really wants to bring it back.

  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Funny how when China makes a bunch of cars it’s “over capacity” and needs 100% tariffs, but Japan has been doing the same thing for decades and no one batted an eye.

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Those pickup trucks do look really nice, though. If I ever triple my salary I might consider one.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ain’t spending that stupid amount of money for either a Tesla or Rivian. Make something half the price that can run 300 miles, and you will have my attention, (the Chevy Bolt was so close).

        EVs are toys for the upper middle class and the rich.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        At $74k per truck, you could buy 2.5 $30k Priusi

        The Silverado Electric is at least in an affordable ballpark, at $40k for their base model. But what the hell does everyone need a truck for, anyway? I see them in the office parking garage all the time, and I can’t imagine what everyone thinks they’re lifting or towing.

        Meanwhile, the BYD Seagull goes for under $10k, a third the price of a Nissan Leaf.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I buy lumber every couple of weekends. Sometimes used furniture. Can’t do that in my Civic. So I have to borrow my dad’s truck. I’d love to get a light pickup like the S-10 or Ranger used to be (and electric if it was available) but there’s nothing like that available these days because of American bullshit.

          • Wiz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, you seem to need it, but almost every time I see a pickup truck, it is:

            • Driven by a white dude with no passengers
            • Has no cargo
            • Not hauling anything

            I full up my 11-gallon tank in my small 4-door car. I can’t imagine the expense of filing that up, nor the payments of purchasing one

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m excited for affordable electric trucks.

          I do a lot of wood working as a hobby and some commissions for friends, and deeply regret having to sell my old F150 for a van. Now I have to rent a store pickup if I need to move large sheets of plywood or long pieces of dimensional lumber. I also work in the trades, and while it’s possible to move most of the stuff I need in my van, a pickup would be nice, as long as it doesn’t suck down gas like it’s got a hole in the tank.

          Having an electric pickup that doesn’t cost as much as a corvette would be really nice for my use case.