The clothing in the picture doesn’t match the clothing the suspect was booked in. So it’s still in question.
25+ yr Java/JS dev
Linux novice - running Ubuntu (no windows/mac)
The clothing in the picture doesn’t match the clothing the suspect was booked in. So it’s still in question.
All things in moderation. The world is a spinning plate and extremes are to be avoided. Instead, the correct course is an ephemeral point somewhere around the middle which we must continually chase as it moves in response to the world. We all do our best to balance the world a little closer to what we want it to be.
Assuming I am even making sense of what you’re asking, because this is pretty unclear.
It’s god’s will. It was just her time.
/s
Yes. For proof, look at when cops murder people.
But why would someone advertise on Truth Social over Facebook?
Because I could sell star spangled shit on a shingle to that lot for a premium.
People are big mad that Springfield didn’t find pet-eating Haitians when demanded by Trump.
I won’t trust it until I read it in his obituary. Until then he’s going to be claiming stolen election every single day.
They weren’t even from earth.
They should just fly it out of the environment.
Both sides can definitely be bad. It’s like when Google and MS sue each other. I don’t care who wins, I just want them to hurt each other.
Do you have the connections to run a dryer in your bathroom? In the US, you’d need 240v electric or a gas supply which aren’t commonly found in a bathroom. Also an exterior vent.
I suggest a combo washer/dryer which runs on 120v and uses a heat pump for drying. They are quite expensive in comparison to just a dryer, but can be used anywhere you have water and a drain and the total cost would likely be less than having 240v run to the bathroom.
Or maybe you live somewhere where this isn’t so, in which case disregard this.
It sounds like you are describing a blog. If you want to stay in the fediverse, there is WriteFreely. I have an account on paper.wf, but I haven’t used it yet tbh.
You made a lot of points here. Many I agree with, some I don’t, but I specifically want to address this because it seems to be such a common misconception.
It does and it doesn’t discard the original. It isn’t impossible to recreate the original (since all the data it gobbled up gets stored somewhere in some shape or form and can be truthfully recreated, at least judging by a few comments bellow and news reports). So AI can and does recreate (duplicate or distribute, perhaps) copyrighted works.
AI stores original works like a dictionary does. All the words are there, but the order and meaning is completely gone. An original work is possible to recreate by randomly selecting words from the dictionary, but it’s unlikely.
The thing that makes AI useful is that it understands the patterns words are typically used in. It orders words in the right way far more often than random chance. It knows “It was the best of” has a lot of likely options for the next word, but if it selects “times” as the next word, it’s far more likely to continue with, “it was the worst of times.” Because that sequence of words is so ubiquitous due to references to the classic story. But over the course of following these word patterns, it will quickly glom onto a different pattern and create a wholly new work from the original “prompt.”
There are only two cases in which an original work should be duplicated: either the training data is far too small and the model is overtrained on that particular work, or the work is the most derivative text imaginable lacking any flair or originality.
Adding more training data makes it less likely to recreate any original works.
I am aware of examples where it was claimed an LLM reproduced entirely code functions including original comments. That is either a case of overtraining, or far too many people were already copying that code verbatim into their own, thus making that work very over represented in the training data (same thing, but it was infringing developers who poisoned the data, not researchers using bad training data).
Bottom line: when created with enough data, no original works are stored in any way that allows faithful reproduction other than by chance so random that it’s similar to rolling dice over a dictionary.
None of this means AI can do no wrong, I just don’t find the copyright claim compelling.
Also staff are poorly paid and have to endure abusive situations. I dated someone who worked in a care home and she was constantly subjected to sexual and other assaults. But at the same time it’s already prohibitively expensive to have to live in one.
I don’t know what the solution is but I would prefer euthanasia to ever living in one (for myself — I’m not advocating killing anyone just because they are old)
I had an A500 and the 40MB drive was as expensive as the computer.
So I’m thinking back to the times I’ve used it. I want to say I assume they have a way to track where this is being used based on referrer, but I don’t remember clearly enough. I don’t think a given token has to be tied to any URL. You just get a token and validate it with a service.
But people who use it on a daily basis could probably answer more definitively. I’ve just used it a couple of times and didn’t bother retaining it because it’s easy to figure out when you need it.
You don’t need to be vetted to use OAUTH. And you shouldn’t need to be. It would kill OAUTH completely.
I can definitely account for 1.
Looks like she was black so I’m pretty sure they don’t give a single fuck.