The president of Mexico on Thursday expressed hope that Google “reconsiders” its decision to change its online maps to reflect U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that he has the authority to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order announcing he was changing the name of the body of water to the Gulf of America.

For U.S. users of Google Maps, the gulf was listed as the Gulf of America as of Thursday. Google, whose CEO attended Trump’s inauguration along with other tech moguls, said last month it has “a long-standing practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources.”

But Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned Thursday that her government “will file a civil suit” against Google if it does not revert back to labeling the international body of water the Gulf of Mexico.

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    But it kinda makes sense to be called Gulf of America since it’s located in North America.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Google also removed the ability to suggest edits to specifically the Gulf.

    Guess they knew ahead of time they’d get an influx of requests to change or back.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Republicans are so good at baiting liberals into useless bullshit arguments, while they plunder stuff that actually matters.

  • keropoktasen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well, the continent was named America, not the US continent. So the name Gulf of America just sounds right.

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Don’t sue- just threaten to block some of googles services in your country and they’ll come around real quick. Hit em where it hurts. Google isn’t hurting for lawyers.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      You have to hit them in the wallet. Every time Trump does or says anything about tariffs, just starting increasing tariffs on all Tesla products.

      We can’t hit Trump directly but we can hit his little friends quite easily.

      Musk will have an absolute meltdown on twitter of course, but if you just ignore him he’ll give up. He’s already shown that he is prepared to back down if he’s actually facing financial penalties.

      • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Tragically we have a dried apricot ceding power to the highest bidder. There isn’t much for other countries to do directly unless they are paying for “sock puppet time” or getting in a pissing match with a clown that makes a juggalo look smart.

        This is more about controlling (collateral) damage: in this case megacorps “kissing the ring” via stupid shit like Google is doing presently. Countries can fuck with corporations far easier than we can (guess who paid for sock puppet time…)

        Google is clearly attempting to make themselves more “saleable” to the ruling party by dropping things like month names or renaming universally accepted names of global features. Right now their -baseline- is where we are at currently. A lawsuit does next to nothing. It’s an operating cost. A country threatening to blacklist their service will hit them cleanly in the only thing that matters: their shareholders. Our biggest corporations have time and again rolled over for this tactic. They may have elevated themselves to a godlike status within the states but they are vulnerable outside our shores.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Google are an American company, and the government of the USA has changed the name. What else do people expect them to do?

    Besides, it still say Gulf of Mexico if you’re outside the USA.

    • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It shows up as “Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)” outside of the US apparently. That seems like enough to make a fuss to me; bodies of international water have specific rules around name changes and the US can’t unilaterally decide differently.

        • lunarul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Ok, that’s absurd. I thought it makes sense to change the name for people in the US if that’s the official name in the US (according to the USGS data, which has always been the official source for this info). But translating the US name into other languages that already have a name for it makes no sense.

          • orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Ha. I speak Spanish and Japanese. My girlfriend lives in Jilatopec. Sheinbaum está furiosa con Trump y me encanta.

      • 100@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        americans can call it whatever the fuck they want, that wont suddenly change its local or english name in any other countries

        • DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Imagine being a tourist in the US, looking for an address you believe to be say, Martin Luther King Street. Can’t find it anywhere, even on Google maps, then eventually you talk to someone and find out it’s now called Elon Musk Avenue.

          Not saying this is exactly the same, but if we’re letting people change the names of places on commonly used global map software willy nilly, even if it’s just region to region, we’re gonna end up with problems. It’s not like “freedom fries” back in the day that legitimately affected no one.

          And I am suddenly seeing a parenthetical on the Gulf here outside the US, so there technically was a sudden change

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      What else do people expect them to do?

      1.- Refuse-

      2.- Apply only the part of the name change that’s actually covered by US jurisdiction. The Gulf of Mexico extends noticeably beyond US’s borders.

      But hey this is Google we’re talking about.

      Besides, it still say Gulf of Mexico if you’re outside the USA.

      If I’m a eg.: Colombian, it should be “Gulf of Mexico” “Golfo de México” wherever I stand, not “Gulf of America”.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Apply only the part of the name change that’s actually covered by US jurisdiction.

        Strictly speaking, per the EO, this is what they should have done. The EO defines the area to be renamed as:

        the U.S. Continental Shelf area bounded on the northeast, north, and northwest by the States of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida and extending to the seaward boundary with Mexico and Cuba in the area formerly named as the Gulf of Mexico

        You can see exactly where that seaward boundary is on this map: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_ECS_Regions_2023.png

        The area described is less than half the whole Gulf of Mexico.

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Doesn’t need to (but yeah yeah they’re Google, I know…). They just should name it “Gulf of México” or whatever the translated name is to the user’s device, and add an asterisk somewhere that shows a note to the effect of “a small fraction of Confederate remnants think it should be called ‘Gulf of America’”.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            That is essentially what they’ve done by putting Gulf of America in brackets behind the original name.

            • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              But why? Why should any other country care about the US’s ridiculous internal politics

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      the government of the USA has changed the name

      When did they do that?

      Or are you one of those people who would agree if Trump said “I am the state”?

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It was changed by executive order, which the president has the authority to do. Google doesn’t get to go “nuh-uh” and keep it the same.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            If you want to know more about how the US government works, I’m not the person to educate you.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                You can argue with strangers on the Internet as much as you like, but the fact is, the US president can and has changed the name of multiple geographic features, and arguing with me won’t change that.

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Oh, you’ve been caught being dumb and your story is changing.

                  First it was “the government”, now it’s “the president”.

                  That’s not how America works, lol. Naming things is a legislative responsibility. Trump can sign as many executive orders as he wants, but it isn’t official without an act of congress and a chance for the judiciary to object.

        • Breve@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Why didn’t they change it only in the US and not elsewhere? Could you imagine the uproar if Google censored Tiananmen Square world wide because of the Chinese government?

          PS: Yes it was modified for everyone outside the US too. I am not American but your “president” is now allowed to change what name I have to call something?

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Because Google is a US company, and not in a position to tell the US government to take a walk, that’s why.

            • Breve@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Did the US government tell Google to censor Tiannamen Square, or are they a global company that has to observe more than the whims of a single country?

              I hope other countries start renaming the US soon.

                • Breve@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Travel to Beijing, open up Google search, and see if it gives you any historically accurate results about what happened there.

                  I’m serious, it sounds like you could use a lesson in freedom and the world outside your country.

            • Stovetop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              I mean, they are to an extent. The laws of the US are ostensibly supposed to allow citizens to call things whatever they want. If the government wants to throw a hissy fit and say the constitution is meaningless after all, let them do it. At least then we could give up all of the pretense that they are supposed to care about what it says.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                to allow citizens to call things whatever they want.

                I very much doubt that privilege extends to a mapmaker

                • Stovetop@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Why wouldn’t it? Google’s just a company, not an arm of the government. At best, maybe there is some sort of accreditation process to have their maps called “authentic” or “accurate” or whatnot, but I’ve never heard of any US law that penalizes the publication of an inaccurate map.

    • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      If there existed any valid reasoning for the change… 🤷‍♂️

      But the Felon Dicktater is only doing it so he can claim himself architect of global geographic change. Same reason he wants Greenland, Panama, Gaza, etc.

      Fuck that.

      I back Sheinbaum on this one. Won’t matter, but do it anyway.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Not quite.

          DuckDuckGo’s results are a compilation of “over 400” sources according to itself, including Bing, Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha , Yandex, and its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot); but none from Google. It also uses data from  sites such as wikipedia, to populate knowledge panel boxes to the right of the search results.

            • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Still they’re right - it’s not “just Bing” that’s a bit of an over simplification IMO, like someone saying “firefox is just google chrome” because it uses google search by default.

              DDG is still preferable to vanilla bing and google because the privacy is stronger and it produces useful results. There is no perfect search engine, right now we have to compromise.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I can see Google (and Apple) quietly paying a fine and changing it for Mexico (and any other jurisdiction that specifically asks).

    This is stupid and cowardly of them, but that aside, the implication is 100% “comply, or the US government will make life difficult for Google.” I can see how they’re stuck between a rock and a hard place.

    • cotlovan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Since when is the big tech the arbiter of truth? It might come as a surprise to you, but Google and Apple don’t care about your holy war against Trump.

        • cotlovan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think Google and Apple should call it whatever the official names are, not to take any sort of political stance.

            • cotlovan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              In case you have forgotten, Google is an American company, every one of their decisions is taken in California. Maybe calling everything you don’t agree “fascist” isn’t a smart idea, since it shows that you have no idea what the meaning of that word is.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                That is not what I asked.

                OK, let’s reverse it, and say Mexico renamed the Gulf to something else. What do you think Google should do, inside Mexico and out?

                • cotlovan@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Inside Mexico they should name it whatever the Mexico calls it. Outside Mexico it should be called however it is called in the respective country.

                  But again, Google is based in the US, all their decisions are made there.

    • ggppjj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Step two of the plan you outlined was inverted by Google, but the effect is the same: IIRC it only shows up that way for US users.

      Edit: apparently that was either a lie or incomplete info, see comments elsewhere in this thread.

    • RxBrad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I legitimately don’t understand why the U.S. isn’t the only locality where it shows up as “Gulf of America”.

      Set the en-US string to “Gulf of America”. Leave literally every other region’s text string untouched from what it was 6 months ago.

      When the next Democrat U.S. President gets sworn in and immediately Executive Orders it back to “Gulf of Mexico”, change the en-US string back to that.

      This is all so stupid and melodramatic.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      The new name shows only for USA. In Mexico it’s unchanged, or shown with both names.

      Our president is dumb and just wants to look like she’s fighting back without actually doing anything significant.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Showing with both names does not make it any better and I’m not sure why you think it does. They’re just kowtowing to a unilateral decision made by one of the multiple countries that border the Gulf of Mexico.

        I assume you would not want Taiwan to be called Chinese Taipei on Google Maps despite China calling it that.

    • Elshar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nah, they’re a megacorp, you gotta hurt them where it counts - in their bottom line. Make them use their super expensive lawyers to defend this shit. Honestly more people/entities should do this. Even pro se, these corporate lawyers cost these companies literally hundreds of thousands of dollars to go into court. Just imagine how much you could cost them if everyone started suing them for any little thing. Even a response to a lawsuit requires a lawyer, which requires time and effort.

      Its literally the only thing they care about - money. Strongly worded letters and protests aren’t enough. They can ignore those.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Google is worth more than Mexico. A frivolous lawsuit, which is what this would be, will hurt Mexico more.

        • AJ1@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          have we (the human race) ever been to this point before? where corporations are big enough to absorb whole countries and there’s pretty much nobody who’ll stand up to them?

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            The East India Company is the first example that comes to mind. I’m sure others.

            I really don’t think we are living through unprecedented times, unfortunately. People have sucked for as long as we’ve existed.