• JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t care about the nostalgia, but they are going to stop being easy to squeeze into a lunchbox now, so I’ll find a different brand.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I see a ton of comments here hating on nostalgic people, with no actual nostalgic people in sight yet.

    Personally I don’t care if a pouched drink exists or not, but if they are no longer producing pouched drinks they should probably retire the brand.

    Do you remember what a CapriSun tastes like? It’s somewhere between an extremely-artificially flavored “juice” concentrate and a “fruit flavored” drink like Kool-Aid. The whole appeal was the packaging.

    • Nurgle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I see a ton of comments here hating on nostalgic people, with no actual nostalgic people in sight yet.

      …yeah you’re in a Lemmy comment section.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is absolutely reeks of a bullshit “OMG the sky must be falling for you” condescending article from an older generation that thinks younger nostalgia is silly. I wouldn’t give this article any more credence than a boomer yelling “Avocado Toast!” at you when you’re enjoying a nice brunch. It’s just needlessly sensationalist shit stirring.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    No this is good, I’ve been complaining about this since I was a kid and drank one where the straw got all clogged up so I cut into it and there was some creepy gross dead worm looking thing.

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Good, the packages can’t even be recycled. Corporations should be held liable for their plastic waste contributions via the packaging.

    • paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You think the bottles are going to be any better? They’re going to end up in the ocean with all of the other plastic bottles from other drinks.

          • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Single serving things should be illegal, only things needs to be single serving is shit found in a hospital

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Single serving containers for food have their place, but there’s nothing that can’t be stored in either wax paper, aluminum, or glass(in that order). Aluminum is probably the best balance between recyclability and weight(fuel need to transport . You can even make aluminum “bottles” that fit in preexisting vending machines.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        PET bottles are very easily recicled. In my country a sizeable amount of PET bottles sold are 100%recycled PET

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          But only a small fraction of the plastic gets recycled.

          If 9/10ths of the plastic ends up in a landfill or the Pacific garbage patch, having 1/10th of that plastic recycled into another bottle (which then will eventually have 9/10ths tossed in a landfill anyways) isn’t doing much. It’s better than not recycling at all, but it’s green washing to say that it’s “eco friendly”, which Capri-Sun allegedly did at this trade show.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      you only need to make them pay the price of each packaging every day until it biodegrades. you’ll see change very quickly.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’ll spend 300millions in lawyer fees to find a loophole where they only need to pay one packet for the time it takes to burn.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Right? But this only applies to Capri Sun. If it were Hi-C, you’d demand a juice box.

    Also, the people who are currently in their childhood absolutely do not care. It’s just us 40+ curmudgeons that must drink Capri Sun from a pouch, Hi-C from a tiny box, and Sunny D straight from that wonky-shaped jug that won’t fit in the fridge door.

    • ahal@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I dunno… Anytime my kids see these pouches at a store, they beg us for them. We’ve never bought them at home either. I think kids just like the novelty of drinking out of a bag.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    But the original package seems like such an efficient way to injest micro-plastics. I hope the bottles have the annoying safety rings that are hard for people to open because they probably also produce micro-plastics.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I can’t speak for how the different materials degrade over time, but at least the old mylar bags were shielded from sunlight.

      They were polyester-reverse side printed to aluminum then laminated to polyethylene.

  • TwentySeven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The article doesn’t actually say they are phasing out pouches, just that they are introducing bottles.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah thats fair.

      The outrage might even be a result of corporate marketing strategy.

      Maybe I should alakazam the post?

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Seems they updated the article title, which now says the exact opposite of your post title.

        Unsure if you can edit. Here’s the new title:

        Capri Sun promises they aren’t phasing out pouches after reports of a switch to bottles ruined childhoods everywhere

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have always, for the entirety of their existence, hated those dumb pouches. Good riddance as far as I’m concerned.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They made a really loud noise in the lunchroom if you inflated the pouch all the way, folded over the straw to seal it, then stomped on it really hard with your shoe. This was before mentally deranged people started shooting up schools though, so maybe don’t try it.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Mentally deranged people have been shooting up schools since before Capri Sun was even invented…

        How old are you?

          • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Columbine was far from the first school shooting. According to the Washington Post:

            “The first recorded school shooting in the United States was in 1853 at a schoolhouse in Louisville, Kentucky. On November 2, 1853, Matt Ward shot and killed teacher William H.G. Butler with a pistol hidden in his coat pocket.”

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I know it’s not the first, I never claimed it was. But as someone who is old enough to remember what life was like before Columbine, that was the one that changed everything. That’s when we started having active shooter drills.

              Then 9/11 just amplified it.

            • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think the very important point you’re missing is that schools did not exist in fear of school shootings before Columbine. There were no lockdown drills and crazy security measures for entering and leaving the building. So making a big loud noise would not make people instantly think someone was shooting up the school like it very well might today.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fine by me!..As long as whoever at Pepsi made the decision to only release Hard Mt Dew in “Zero sugar” versions is nowhere near it

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That can’t be possible, glucose is required for fermentation to make the ethanol or it couldn’t be alcoholic. It’s the only reason college students could keep on weight where I was from.

        I wonder if it is all some marketing scheme where they are saying zero sugar because there is “no added sugar”. Basically making the non flavored malt alcohol, then flavoring it and adding artificial sweetener to get the sweetness.

        Otherwise if we could ferment and make alcohol without sugars, many people would start drinking 0 calories alcoholic beverages, as drinking 10 beers gives you about 1200 calories (bud light, miller light whatever shitty beers are around 120 calories a piece). Alcoholics would save 2lbs of weight gain a week there.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s probably all marketing, anything branded “Zero sugar” still has that ass tasting sugar substitute aspartame in it

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        That annoyed me to no end. I have to wonder about the big push in artificial sweeteners recently; are they cheaper than corn syrup now? Are there enough people who are trying to cut back on sugar but also actually like the taste of dissolved copper in their drinks to keep soda profits high?