Oh, nice. I can’t see that in the Boost app, but is plain to see on a web link. Thanks!

This is the worst genre of fanfic

Which rule did that break?

That’s OK, I see that I’m on .ml and I don’t feel the need to debate a 1 month old Russian bot account today.

My point was that denazification was not the reason. So you agree with my only point and then extrapolated a bunch if other stuff.

Aha, but Azov is very powerful neo-nazi movement. They and their allies may hold no political seats, but the only way to be sure is full-scale invasion special military operation. Will only be few days weeks months years

I hear the whole season is a finale

No we need to ask him really firmly about the what he really thinks when he signs an executive order spinning up concentration camps.

Ahh America. Land of the free, home of the Union busting corporations literally making robot scabs

Of course he’s not going to help anyone, he’s a big toe in a hat!

I imagine they mean like Ottoman coffeehouse rather than Starbucks, but still true about the lack of whiteboards

The only charge is “potential to spread rabies” and they killed the animal to test for that (for some reason). So, if the test comes back negative, they will make full repariations right?

Never thought he would refer to himself as the wedge, but it’s an image of a three-way I never wanted in my mind

Sorry, next time I will look at all Ukrainian soldier social media accounts and then look up who Stepan Bandera is and worship him and I’m sure that will provide more context to the article you posted

You seem to be completely ignoring my analysis of the content and the source and the MPs background which I posted above. It seems like I’ve thought about it more than you.

That would be the “Source of the source”

Thanks for the additional context.

The additional context: “yes, I posted a propaganda article, but your investigation of the source and the source of the source wasn’t enough. You need to investigate more but I won’t provide any links or other sources.”

TIL its tOtALlY rANdOm to read the “About Us” page of a website that people are discussing the origin of.

Do you realise I’m a different person to the other poster? You told them to read the website and you are telling me not to read the website.

I already clicked through to the source, an RT article, which is clearly labelled as posted by the Russian part of BRICS.

I also looked up the MP, who was expelled from her liberal party for corrupt activities and now represents the party of an oligarch which has less than 1% of the national vote share.

So yes in conclusion, it is Russian propaganda. Who knows if the 100,000 figure is true, she is the only source, but without context it doesn’t really mean anything anyway.

Was I supposed to read all that or not?

What is BRICS? Very useful page, that…