https://archive.is/2nQSh

It marks the first long-term, stable operation of the technology, putting China at the forefront of a global race to harness thorium – considered a safer and more abundant alternative to uranium – for nuclear power.

The experimental reactor, located in the Gobi Desert in China’s west, uses molten salt as the fuel carrier and coolant, and thorium – a radioactive element abundant in the Earth’s crust – as the fuel source. The reactor is reportedly designed to sustainably generate 2 megawatts of thermal power.

  • fullsquare@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    this is toy sized reactor, not even entire technology demonstrator, there are medical isotope/research reactors with power 20MWt and more

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      This is such a weird comment, full of “NiCd batteries aren’t good enough so solar/wind are useless because we can’t store the power” energy.

      It’s a test reactor, it’s meant to be smaller than the “big boys”, and in a few years it’ll be smaller and more efficient.

      Sure, it’s not going to singlehandedly power an entire country, but distributed power is better than localized. 1000 small reactors placed all over means less likelihood of system wide failure than a handful of large ones.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      A small test reactor paves the way for bigger, more practical reactors. You can’t start with a full-sized gigawatt model; you need to test and validate your designs at a small scale first.

      • fullsquare@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        There were small reactors that ran on thorium. Scaling up all the necessary molten salt processing will be pretty hard thing to do, if this thing can even run continously that is

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          The article makes it very clear its running continuously, which is what they are celebrating. They have successfully refueled it while operating, which is a huge part of the “continuous.”

          The article is all of 6 paragraphs. It’s not a difficult read.

          • fullsquare@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            That reactor is 2MWt, which is still somewhere about 1000x smaller than actual production reactors. But this is not the issue here, because in MSR the reactor is not the hard part, it’s its entire fuel cycle.

            The entire point of having fuel as a solution instead of hard, nonreactive ceramic pellets put in tubes made of refractory metal is that there could be perhaps a way to extract fission products from coolant/fuel, which would prevent neutron capture by these fission products, which makes in turn better use of neutrons, so more fissile material can be bred. Benefit of this is that if that online recycling process can be made to work (big if - unsolved for now) then reactor works always like it’s been freshly refueled. The hard part here is not reactor, it’s the cleaning of fuel while reactor is still online. This has not been demonstrated, instead only new fuel was added, which is something that can be done with CANDU and some other designs where reactor is divided into channels

            First attempts at something like this used heavy water acidified solution of uranium nitrate, but this proved too corrosive and also water needed to be pressurized, and also it decomposes when subjected to radiation in this way. Today what is used is FLiBe, which is low-melting salt that doesn’t decompose in this manner, but also is more corrosive and in different ways than water as used in PWRs. If that was the only problem, we would have MSRs left and right, but there are three other big problems

            Recovery of excess bred 233U or removal of neutron-absorbing fission products from FLiBe is hard, because you can’t use normal methods used in nuclear reprocessing. There’s no extraction like in PUREX, there’s no ion exchange resin that can survive it, there’s only fluoride volatility and some electrochemical methods, and it all would require significant research before anything close to viable comes up. The salt also probably has to be kept anhydrous at all times. This is the first problem. Maybe this reactor will be used for it, maybe it’ll fail, but there’s a related Problem that doesn’t appear in more conventional reactors. In normal case, you can just leave fuel elements in water until the spiciest isotopes decay so that you don’t have to deal with them. Here, we intentionally work with freshly irradiated, so ridiculously spicy fuel, and intentionally concentrate the most radiotoxic isotopes that are out there. Worse than that, all these fission products are not in form of chemically inert ceramic, these are in form of water soluble fluoride salts and this means that if anything of this gets into soil, it’ll dissolve meaning that either fuel leak or waste stream leak would have much more severe consequences than if it was in conventional form. If you’re trying to say that MSRs are safer for some reason, i’d have some serious reservations.

            The other problem is that FLiBe is a good moderator, meaning that any MSR reactor design using this salt is thermal reactor, and we already have this figured out in form of PWRs where we can use water instead. Look up India’s plans for thorium power - they want to use PWR reactors for breeding 233U, with heavy water or not, because this already works and there’s no actual reason for use of this highly experimental and uncertain technology. Keeping fuel rods in reactor for longer time is not an actual showstopper like it was expected in 60s when this concept first surfaced, in fact with advancement of nuclear technology burnup only goes up, i think it already is 2x or 3x what it used to be in early commercial power reactors. If MSR was the only way to make breeding work, we’d probably take effort to manage ridiculous radiotoxicity of this fuel mix, but because both chemical engineering to do so is not there and alternatives that don’t have this problems exist, we don’t. Charitably i’d could describe MSR fuel cycle idea as an highly experimental but promising while also requiring significant research expense. Less charitably, looking at all those years of research yielding nothing, i could also describe it as a dead end grift. You decide

            Note that all these problems come up with use of MSR, not thorium. Thorium for nuclear power is fine, but requires reprocessing, and some countries don’t want to do this for diplomatic reasons (americans specifically) (tho i suspect it’s masking the actual reason: some bean counter at westinghouse calculated it’s cheaper to use fresh uranium instead - reprocessing is a lot of dangerous, well-paid, complicated work - in countries where labour costs are lower, or where govt is willing to pay up to have reserve of nuclear material, which amounts to all other countries that have sufficiently advanced nuclear industry, reprocessing does happen. french, chinese, russians, indians, japanese, koreans, and probably a couple more do reprocess their fuel. there’s a couple of countries that send their fuel to manufacturer, and some just discard it underground without reprocessing) (this is also why yucca mountain filling up is a problem of entirely american making, and the only thing that is lacking in order to solve it is political will)

          • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            As someone that often works for multiple years on pilot and poc projects, can we stop calling those “toys”.

            Sorry we don’t have madscientist money here.

          • fullsquare@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            The article makes it very clear its running continuously, which is what they are celebrating

            i think you’ve read different article

            Chinese scientists have achieved a milestone in clean energy technology by successfully adding fresh fuel to an operational thorium molten salt reactor, according to state media reports.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Thorium tarnishes to olive grey when exposed to air. This makes it kinda greenish. Green is the color of stamina, so this checks out.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Remember when it was all the hype when things just started - crazy to see it actually happen

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Refreshing not to see the comment section full of anti-nuclear brainlets. For a second I thought Lemmy was a Greenpeace hot-spot.

    Anyway…

    One good turn deserves another. If others won’t follow because of good example, hopefully other countries will instead follow because of competition.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      green peace is cool and all, but nuclear the only way forward, other than asking everyone nicely to use much less energy…
      and supposedly the new molten salt thorium reactor design automatically shuts itself off and basically can’t have a meltdown… if that’s real it’s a great way forward….
      well, except for all the nuclear waste, but i’m sure they’ll figure that out too….

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Tell me you don’t know anything about nuclear energy without saying you don’t know anything about nuclear energy.

          • Rakonat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            I know enough to know that if you’re worried about pollution from Nuclear then you should be worried about all the waste products in production of solar panels which can be extremely toxic. And that if you’re specifically talking about the amount of radiation a megawatt reactor will produce in it’s life time you should never venture anywhere close to a coal burning plant because the amount of radioactive material they let loose into the atmosphere is orders of magnitudes greater than you could get from a uranium reactor, with thorium reactors being predicted and shown in small scale testing to have significantly less dangerous byproducts left over. With several theories and proposed designs for fusion and thorium reactors that could recycle spent fuel and further reduce the amount of high level waste a facility would have at the end of it’s life cycle, because unlike all other forms of energy generation, the nuclear facilities contain and keep their waste products on site for decades and only transfer it off site during decommissioning.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Radioactive nuclear materials comes from the Earth. All one has to do is put it back in the Earth. Finland built a massive underground nuclear waste storage facility, but there are also technologies being developed to reclaim nuclear waste (because only a very small amount if the material actually gets used in the fission process).

          • Rakonat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            It’s a lot simpler than the majority of humanity reverting to pre-industrial lifestyles.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            For the amount of actual nuclear waste, it kind of is. Earth is so huge and the amount of waste so small, that you could bury literally ALL of it under a mountain somewhere and chances are high that it would never see daylight again nor would never be found by anyone in the future.

            Even despite this, extraordinary measures are taken to make sure nothing escapes the containment until such time that Earth’s crust has completely rolled down into the mantle or the mountain erodes, which by then it wouldn’t be nuclear waste anymore.

            • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              We need to store the waste for thousands of years. This is bad. We are able to recycle the waste for more power but we’re not allowed to because it produces a tiny bit enriched uranium and that’s not allowed by the pact the US and Russia made. But recycling waste is tech from the 70’s and it can reduce the half life of 100.000 years to 100 years.

              Thorium however, is a different story. It doesn’t work with gamma radiation but with alpha radiation. Alpha radiation is the most dangerous form of radiation, but it doesn’t go far and doesn’t go through many things. You can contain it with a piece of paper. Gamma radiation is the least harmful form of radiation but the big issue is it goes really far and goes through almost anything.

              So waste from a Thorium reactor is much less harmful, easy to contain, also has a very short half life (I don’t know how long but it’s really short, as in several years) so Thorium really is awesome. Thorium is also a waste product of many other mining operations so it’s already a form of recycling. The downside of a Thorium reactor is that it’s far more complex than the reactors we know so it’s very hard and expensive to build, more than a regular reactor. So it will cost a lot, takes a long time, but it’s an extremily safe and wise investment.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                We need to store the waste for thousands of years. This is bad.

                I feel like you didn’t read my comment and just wanted to talk about thorium. Which is fine, yes I know it generates less waste and creates its own fuel and all that, I am speaking about nuclear waste as we know it right now, from our hundreds of traditional power plants, the things that MOST people associate with dangers of nuclear waste. Which I explained is not even remotely the problem people think it is, because the actual amount is so small and those thousands of years pass in a blink of an eye deep under earth’s crust.

                Thorium is good. Traditional nuclear power is also good.

                • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Yeah but traditional nuclear power can be with much less waste which has a much shorter half life if we recycle the waste, is my point. Less than 100 years instead of thousands. But the recycling process which dates from the 70’s is banned because the process also provides a tiny bit of enriched uranium.

                  So I’m not against traditional nuclear power, I think we can do much better if we recycle, plus Thorium reactors are a good addition.

      • cdkg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yeah, thorium reactors can’t meltdown because they need to constantly being powered by thorium, sick you can find anywhere. There’s a 2008 or so bill gates Ted talk on nuclear power that talks about it. For better or worse, china is going to lead the world regarding energy (and economy, seeing all those trump tariffs)

        • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          i did see that TED talk… i saw someone say that’s just the reactor design that’s safe, and uranium couldn’t melt down in that type of reactor either….
          but that was just some comment and i’m not qualified to speculate on it… but meltdowns are the biggest problem with nuclear, imo….

          i think we should just dump all of our nuclear waste off the coast of japan… and hopefully generate some kaijū

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Me opening the comment section knowing that its just gonna be a bunch of racism… like i get it i hate the chinese government as well but give credit to the millions of scientists and people who are actually trying to make life better on this earth. If something isnt american, it can still be nice to have.

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      I personally believe the CCP is doing an amazing job. Communism is working wonderfully

      • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I don’t think it’s communism anymore but the Chinese gov are actually looking after their own citizens in my opinion. I kind wish Xi was in charge of the UK honestly.

        They tend to think of everything long term and all of those projects are paying off, also Healthcare free education etc they are investing more in their own population than anyone else. US is in my opinion as UK guy pretty much done they’ve picked a fight that they won’t win.

        • Mistic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          “Anymore” as if it ever was. Even USSR never claimed to be a communist country

          P.S. They claimed to be a socialist, then “developed” socialist country that’s “on the path of building communism”.

          • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            I don’t know what they are but I know they look after their citizens more than we do, and they’ve really started taking over the entire Tech space in the last few years mainly due to that.

            I’m UK but if someone held a gun to me and demanded where would I live USA or China I’d honestly pick China.

            I’m Kinda looking forward to the US picking a war then realising China has quantum radar etc and getting schooled, hopefully it doesn’t go Nuclear but I’d still put my own money on China winning.

            • Mistic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              I’d advise you to read more on how Chinese government and spin dictatorships work. There’s a really good book written by Treisman and Guriev

              It’s not really a country you’d choose over US even despite all it’s massive (cough healthcare and consumer protections cough) flaws

        • j0ester@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Idk… I have my ifs and buts about China. If you don’t believe in human rights, well love China! I’m not saying everyone in China is bad (but there are evil individuals like in US and NK). And watching Human Harvest, jeez…

          • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Also most people only see the living conditions of the top 1%. Going to beijing and being amazed by it is like going to hollywood or manhattan and then ignoring the rest of la or upstate ny. And then we havent even gotten to the really bad ones… And then europe also exists. We still exploit poorer countries(which now china also does and the us as well of course) but basically we have the best living conditions in the world and also some of the best places for queer people. Like literally my country that counts as a shithole in europe(hungary) is still somehow one of the best countries by a lot of metrics in the whole world, usually only behind other european countries.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            America has a greater percentage of Americans locked up than China has Uyghurs locked up and we don’t have a Thorium reactor either.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Every time I read a headline about how there’s a genocide in Xinjiang, it’s in the same newspaper that insists Israel Has The Right To Defend Itself and Yemen needs to be bombed to powder.

            At some point, it reads like liberal agitprop. An excuse to scare liberals into hating a foreign country so we can justify… what? Tariffs? TikTok bans? Nuclear war?

            Same with LGBTQ rights. We’ve got a DOGE department doing a pogrom on “woke” government workers while I still get an earful about how mean China is to minority groups?

            What am I supposed to take away from this?

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                The UN inspection committee could not find evidence to support your claims.

                Why are you asserting the existence of a genocide in Xinjiang while endorsing the engineered famine across the border in Afghanistan?

                • ameancow@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  I love how almost none of this discussion is about nuclear power or thorium and just about people wanting to feel morally correct about something and snarling back and forth at each other accusing the other of supporting genocide.

                  Our species is so cooked. We must be the first species to evolve with our heads up our own asses.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                20 days ago

                Sometimes a country will inflate the appearance of problems in an enemy nation in order to stoke resentment at home and justify military action abroad.

                In Iraq, we made up a bunch of lies about soldiers murdering babies in incubators. After Vietnam, we had Cold Warriors repeating the POW/MIA lies that suggested they were holding hundreds of American hostages for decades, in order to justify continued sanctions and embargos. The slanders against Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Iran have been relentless, all while the US conducted insidious guerrilla wars that have raped, mutilated, and killed countless civilians.

                At some point “Both Sides Are Bad” doesn’t cut it. You have to address your own nation’s sins - the lies, the sabotage, the assassinations and us sponsored genocides - before a rational listener can take criticism of your political rivals seriously.

            • Witziger_Waschbaer@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              Well if you want a first hand account: I went to Shanghai with some friends recently, one has family and friends there, so knows the city. We went to the only lesbian bar in all of this huge metropolis. Note that I’m a guy. But due to being closed down before, the place seemed to be rather glad to have some euro faces in there, as a show for the cop car parked right in front of it the whole night.

              My friend also told me, that the amount of beggars was really low this time, because they all got picked up and brought to somewhere else.

              So all in all I think it’s an efficiently run country, but you don’t get around pushing some people out if you want efficiency. Humans are all different, if you want to consider everyone’s opinion it takes a lot of time (which China did not have in the last few decades). So some opinions are forced out rather brutally.

              But, all in all: Go there, experience it yourself.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                I can’t speak to Shanghai. I’ve only been to Hong Kong, Beijing, and Zhuhai - just outside of Macau - and with family (my eight year old niece isn’t much of a clubber yet).

                But all the youth culture I experienced there was thriving. Not exactly going up and asking people their preferred sexuality, but there were plenty of groups that had all the iconography of queerness. There’s still a social stigma against queermess that’s held over from prior generations. But there also isn’t mass shootings or vehicular manslaughter targeting queer communities.

                My father in law (a diehard libertarian Cold Warrior type) was taken aback at how clean the cities were and how safe he felt the whole time he was there. Might be due to his overexposure to Western cinema that paints China (and Mexico and Brazil and South Africa and really any country without a critical mass of white people) as dens of vice and violence. But for some reason, having streets devoid of poverty in the US is aspirational. Having them devoid of poverty outside the US is dystopian.

                The low homelessness might have something to do with China’s stellar public housing policy. The dedication to clean streets and regular maintenance of buildings may have something to do with their prioritization of long term durability over short term profits. And the degree to which they’ve adopted industrial technology makes these enormous, low cost mixed use urban centers possible. It isn’t just random people being wisked away to El Salvador at the whims of a partisan government.

                Humans are all different, if you want to consider everyone’s opinion it takes a lot of time (which China did not have in the last few decades).

                Chinese civil government doesn’t operate in the same adversarial climate as in the US. You don’t have Crossfire hosts screaming at each other or Palestine protesters and Zionists brawling on college campuses. You don’t have bloggers and AM Radio guys stoking stochastic violence against minorities in order to generate private fortunes or billionaires buying up major publishers in order to suck up to or strong arm political leadership.

                Mass Line theory of government tries to be more scientific in it’s approach to polling public sentiment, reaching public policy, and mass marketing changes to traditional views. China’s approach to domestic reform is slower, more small-c conservative, and focused within the party rather than between parties.

                Americans don’t understand that system, so it frightens them. But Americans have made an industry of frightening one another. So Sinophobia is just one more buggabo.

                • Witziger_Waschbaer@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Talk to people that live within the system is all I can tell you. I can absolutely understand the frustrations with the US, but China isn’t perfect either. The culture is less openly confrontational, but money still plays a very important role. Carrot on a stick goes a long way.

      • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Too lazy to scroll down an inch or two to see the comments questioning the tech just because it’s China or making unrelated anti-China comments?

          • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Same thing. You westerners just don’t like acknowledging when your designated adversaries make progress because of your exceptionalism.

            • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              ? Taiwan is actually producing innovation and tech, whereas PRC for the most part stifles it. Both are Chinese, except the former actually has a track record with their claims.

              • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                Immediately does what I just described

                How are you this propagandized? Do you have like no thinking at all, aside from what your corporate media tells you?

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    If true, this is a huge step! Congrats to China!

    “Strategic stamina” is something that the US used to have but which has disappeared as the country just tries to catch its breath.

    • bricklove@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      America has been strategically sitting on a couch eating strategic cheeseburgers for the past 50 years

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      If it’s true, China has energy security for the foreseeable future - as Thorium is usually found along side rare earths, and China has the largest deposits of those. More than anywhere else in the world.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I don’t mean to be a pessimist, but we’ll see how it lasts and scales 😅 it’s certainly promising, but 2MW also isn’t much. I’m curious how large they can scale single reactors, and how close they can safely be to populations - one of the problems with nuclear always ends up being transporting the energy (usually quite far away) once you’ve generated it.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          one of the problems with nuclear always ends up being transporting the energy (usually quite far away) once you’ve generated it

          I don’t get this part. How is this any different from transporting power from hydro? Quebec transports hydro power from all the way north at the bay to the south and then even sells it to USA.

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            You do lose quite a bit of electricity going over long distances, but can overcome that with sheer volume. But that also means the closer the generator to the consumer, the more efficient it’ll be.

            • Uranium 🟩@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 days ago

              An interesting aspect of this is when trying to mover power over long distances AC becomes inefficient and High Voltage DC becomes the more efficient option.

              Between 2-3% for HVDC vs 6-7% for AC systems when transmitting over 1000km.

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          2MW also isn’t much

          It’s a proof of concept, they’re not actually trying to power anything with this. They’re just checking their math on a small scale before doing the full scale lol

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          they haven’t demonstrated anything yet, but maybe they will develop something. perhaps. maybe. it’s all uncertain at this point and technology for it doesn’t exist yet.

          high voltage transmission lines are a thing, look up where lignite or hydro power plants are situated relative to where people live. this is a solved problem

        • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Isn’t the loint of Thorium reactors that they are small and modular, thus highly scalable by multiplying units. Your comment about scaling a single reactor is a cheap rhetorical device to miss the point entirely.

          • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            Scaling small things up is always a logistics and repeatability issue. Always.

            We had.technology to put a capsule of three men on the moon for a week before most humans alive today were born, and yet we haven’t gone back because while both “number of humans” and “length of stay” are fairly simple ideas to scale up, we never had the logistics to create and fuel the one.saturn V launch every other day that a permanent moon base would need.

            Heck, the Internet is full of ground breaking improvements that were “buried” by the challenge of scaling up out of a lab.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Who still thinks the South Chinese Morning Post is a legit source after what happened to Hong Kong needs a reality check.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Scientific advances from China need to have outside confirmation. Because, propaganda and all that

      • Zapados@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Huge amounts are found to be faked or inaccurate. It’s a big issue in academia and has been for decades now.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        totally unrelated but did you hear Tesla’s are at MOST two years away from breaking 1000km range? well they were in 2015. so they’ll definitely have a thousand km range in 2017. I guess we need to see if time really is cyclical and this is for the next cycle’s 2017

    • notaviking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      I cannot speak for this area of science, but in my field China’s research papers, for example rock mass failure response to complex stress states, are like a god send, really quality work. This is my opinion in my field but if I had to extrapolate… Remember the Soviets with all their propaganda had amazing scientists

    • stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      The government agencies that enforce those standards have been gutted in the US. So. Next point?

      I will assume you are European and the above point does not apply as sharply to you, but western empire decay and corruption is slowing eating away all of your criticisms of China.

      But freedom of expression! How is that going for you?
      But communism! How is capitalism going for the average citizen?

      Anyway.

      This is an amazing breakthrough, the citizens of China are lucky to have a government that seems to care about the well-being of their citizens and plan for the future. For some reason, westerners cannot accept good news from China without feeling that the world is a zero sum game. It’s not, Chinese citizens have a brighter future than us in the west because we have allowed corporations to purchase our governments at wholesale prices.

      China is not to blame, well done to China.

      • tino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        This technological breakthrough is amazing, yes, but does not make disappear the constant harassment of minorities, the lack of freedom, the labor camps, the violent repression in Hong-Kong and all the other freaking shit China does on a daily basis.

        And thanks for asking about the freedom of expression in Europe, it’s going really fine.

        • stembolts@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Constant harassment of minorities, lack of freedom, labor camps (El Salvador), violent repression (coming soon). But enough about the United States. Will neoliberalism reach you next?

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Do you do this for your own country and its allies, insist that every issue with it is brought up every time it’s mentioned regardless of context, or do you reserve it for the countries that are your countries enemies?

          Also, try anti-genocide protestors in Germany that freedom of expression is going fine, lol.

          • tino@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            I’m not a patriot. I dont give a shit about my own country. If France is does positive things, good, but it doesn’t I’m going to ignore that our politicians are corrupt or that the Olympics were used to enforce mass surveillance and lock up climate activists.

      • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        According to a modern statistical oracle:

        In 1959, Norway achieved a notable milestone by starting up its first nuclear reactor, the JEEP I (Joint Establishment Experimental Pile), located at Kjeller. This reactor was primarily used for research purposes, including early experiments with alternative nuclear fuels such as thorium. While JEEP I itself was not a thorium reactor per se, it laid the groundwork for subsequent Norwegian research into thorium as a nuclear fuel. This early phase demonstrated Norway’s scientific interest in thorium, leveraging its domestic thorium resources and contributing to later thorium reactor experiments.

          • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            I hope it’s not “worse than useless” (which would mean “misleading”), as my goal was simply to find more identifiers for discussion or research than: norway, thorium, 1959…

            • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              I’m sorry to come on so strong – I don’t think it’s worse than useless as a tool to approach the right answers – but as I saw people upvoting this ‘answer’ without doing any checking, it occurs to me that this is how misinformation spreads. I hope my comment makes more sense in that context.

          • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            Norway has one of the worlds largest deposits of thorium, but I have ot heard that we had a working reactor, just the principle of one.

            If the chinese has indeed made it work I think we need to prepare for USA wanting to annex Norway as well