Analysts criticise lack of detail about the ‘robotaxi’ showcased by CEO Elon Musk

Tesla shares fell nearly 9% on Friday, wiping about $60bn (£45bn) from the company’s value, after the long-awaited unveiling of its so-called robotaxi failed to excite investors.

Shares in the electric carmaker tumbled to $217 at market close following an event in Hollywood, where the chief executive, Elon Musk, revealed a much-hyped driverless vehicle. The stock price is down roughly 12% year-to-date.

However, analysts said the event was short on detail and also expressed disappointment over a lack of specifics about other Tesla projects. Musk has a history of making grand projections about upcoming products and failing to follow through in the timeframe he has set, or at all.

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    A two seater with lambo doors that look like they’ll immediately get sheared off by a passing truck that can’t see them. A laughable delivery timeline. And the “concept” bus looks like a Dustbuster that’ll get stuck in a pothole or on top of a speed bump with its current ground clearance. It’s almost like he’s deliberately trying to tank the stock making all this impractical shit.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    Tesla is no longer a serious company, Elon’s brand has gone from tarnished to trashed. TSLA might be holding on for dear life but ELON is a penny stock now

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    Narayan added that some investors were hoping for a teaser about a lower-priced vehicle, with pedals and steering wheel, that would launch next year. However, none was forthcoming.

    Expectations were low…

  • samokosik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    Tesla and Elon are one of the reasons why I don’t but individual stocks but I rather get indices… It’s just the lack of consistency and the fact a single person can make you lose money…

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      Investing is where you buy into market trackers and have no more than a couple of percent in any given company.

      What you’re talking about is gambling.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 个月前

          The stock price/earnings ratio is still quite high. So based on fundamentals it’s still not a good buy. Instead, you’re gambling that in the future you’ll hear more unexpected good news from Tesla than unexpected bad news.

          Personally, I wouldn’t take that bet.

        • machineLearner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 个月前

          depends on how much faith you have in elons ability to bullshit the masses. I wouldn’t do it, but some have gotten money off that gambit.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 个月前

          Possibly. If Trump wins what are the odds on him letting Elon’s crappy self driving cars be road legal as a thank you for all the election interference? But then what are the odds on Trump doing what he always does and abandoning everyone at the first sign of trouble. What if Trump loses?

          It’s a lot of ifs. Don’t bet more than you can afford to lose is the only advice I can give.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      Generally yes, buy when it is low. Have a look at some graphs of recent performance to see if this is lower than typical weekly low points

      Tesla does have room to expand; the biggest risk is that Musk does something stupid that damages Tesla, he has not done so yet - he seems competent at running (or has given important parts of the job to competent people) Tesla and SpaceX

      Safer investment is through exchange traded funds, especially those which track major indexes (also known as index funds). You buy these the same way you buy other stocks - you’re buying shares in the fund

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      Do you actually believe anything he said is true? Follow-up question, are you literate and do you have access to the internet?

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      Tesla is a so called “meme stock” detached from how a company is actually performing. I’d say avoid it if you’re looking for “steady” buy and hold investing instead of (high tax) daytrader style gambling.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    Elon musk extended family will own the entire Mars facility production and open hell portal?

  • RandomStickman@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    Investors we spoke to at the event thought the event was light of real numbers and timeline

    Not like Elon is famous for keeping the timeline. Man on Mars and Tesla semi any day now.

    • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      Don’t worry, Trump and Elon said that if Trump wins 2024, we’ll have a man on Mars before Trump’s term is over.

      • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 个月前

        So from someone who works in human spaceflight, this is ridiculously outrageous.

        I’m not insinuating that anyone thought it was realistic, but just confirming your suspicions.

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 个月前

          Can you think of any realistic benefit to a manned mission to Mars?

          Bringing back samples would be an amazing feat, and that seems a worthwhile mission. Having a human onboard seems to complicate things far more than any data that would give us would be worth.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 个月前

            I’m not the person you asked and I don’t know anything about such things so this is just supposition but…

            I guess it’s an important milestone on the way to colonising Mars. It would be an acknowledgement that we’ve solved (or mitigated…) all the problems in getting a human to and fro.

            Now, if you’re asking whether there’s any realistic benefit to colonising Mars, the answer IMHO is “not in the next 50 years”.

            • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 个月前

              Yeah, that’s about what I’m thinking. A manned mission to Mars could be an interesting project for our kids or grandkids. Anyone talking about it in our lifetimes is just a grifter.

          • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 个月前

            First, it’s crewed or human mission - inclusive language is important! :)

            I do think human exploration is important because humans can cover longer distances faster. So your overall options for exploration increase. I do think both human and robotic are important and serve valuable purposes.

            It would be more complicated with humans, but I think that’s also a valuable learning experience that could lead to technology that would benefit Earth.

            I do not think “colonization” or whatever term you want to use should be a priority. I think science and exploration are what we should stick to, and if your excuse for colonization is because something bad will happen to Earth so we have to go somewhere else…just spend that time and those resources figuring out how to not fuck up Earth just to go fuck up the next place.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 个月前

            Lots of side benefits when solving the problems faced getting there.

            There are lots of useful minerals on Mars.

            Backup planet if earth gets asteroided

        • niemcycle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 个月前

          Don’t worry, since Trump will install himself as dictator for life, this means he has more than 4 years to get someone to Mars.

          Then again, given Trump’s age and diet, maybe 4 years is generous in and of itself…

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 个月前

        Will this man be alive by the time he reaches mars, or returns to earth? Will the mars spacecraft have the same build quality and reliability as a Tesla Cybertruck, or will it blue screen after leaving the Earth’s orbit?

        • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 个月前

          Dude, I’m positive he won’t make it 2 years and then those christofascists can start with their project with JD couchfucking Vance as the president.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      “I hope they stop. Don’t invest. If somebody is going to try to blackmail me with investing, blackmail me with money? go fuck yourself. Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.”

  • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    Nooo they didn’t like the self-driving robotaxi that isn’t self driving. What about the bus that can’t go over a pothole? No? How about robots that are controlled and voiced by humans? Damn. Tough crowd.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      Also there’s this whole track record of Elon Musk’s demonstrations were there’s no clear independent validation that they actually work as we are being said they to or they’re merelly announcements or concepts: those things are invariably complete total bollock at best bordering on Fraud.

      I reckon that finally he has entirely exhausted both the benefit of the doubt that his demonstrations are in any way honest and representative of real products present or future, and the idea that “he might be bullshitting but he’ll pull in enough suckers that early investors will win from going all in even if it’s 100% bollocks”.

      The Midas Touch of Elon’s bullshit has finally ran its course and turned into a Shit Touch.

  • SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 个月前

    “And all transport will be fully autonomous within 50 years.”

    Bro even cold fusion reactors have less estimation than that.

  • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    More like after Elon’s failed performance at the Trump rally, foreign “investors” pulled their money from Tesla

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    Musk is facing a LOT more practical scrutiny now that the cybertruck is an ongoing fiasco. People are rightfully wary of getting excited about a taxi that only seats two people. Anyone who’s been paying attention will also be suspicious of his claims that the taxi will actually cost under 30k, or that it will truly go into production “before 2027”.

    I will admit that the van looks cool as hell. Of course, I still think Musk is a piece of human garbage, but I will give him that.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 个月前

      I still can’t get over the fact that he called the cybercab “individualized mass transit” lol. Wtf does that even mean. Mass transit… For an individual? So like… A car? Or a bicycle? I guess I’m just not smart enough to understand the world’s smartest human being ever.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      now that the cybertruck is an ongoing fiasco

      Is it, though? I personally hate the fucking things, but it’s not like Tesla is having any trouble selling them.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      I love the aesthetic. I fully support Art Deco public transportation.

      A bus designed by someone who absolutely hates public transportation is pretty funny though. “I wish these seats faced each other so I could sit knee to knee with a stranger.” -Nobody Ever

      And there’s so little passenger space, they have a “luggage” compartment in the front. So I suppose I’m just supposed to put my bag there, out of my sight, then hope nobody takes it before I get off?

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 个月前

              Well… It’s not being engineered with a driver in mind. I don’t think they can just slap a seat in there later; having vs not having a driver is a major design consideration. This vehicle has no driver, period. If the fsd doesn’t work, he has no vehicle.

              So the question isn’t “Will they put a driver in this car?”

              The question is “Will they get this cat on the road?”

              • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                9 个月前

                I can guarantee there is no design yet at all, the whole shit is just vaporware, like all musk’s demos. That demo 100% has driver in the van in the front.

                Edit: note that this part of the thread is about the bus. The robotaxi is definitely just CGI shit, no real engineer has even looked at the design yet.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      It’s windowless. As someone who gets motion sickness if I can’t see out, I would cover the inside of that thing with barf. And the seats are conveniently facing sideways, which is another strong trigger for me, the barf would be aimed directly at the stranger facing me.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      It’s a bus. Elon Musk invented a bus. Now he only needs to invent a time machine, travel back to the 1800s and woo everyone with his new idea.

  • Mak'@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    I just continue to be amazed that, instead of the old, tried-and-true method of giving people what they want—a solid, reliable car at a good price, and a stellar charging network in the places people want to be—a man of his means keeps trying weird gimmicks.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      It’s not so surprising when you consider the fact that he’s nothing but a charlatan.

      Just a colossal idiot with enough money and little enough self awareness that everyone is indulging his every whim and he never stops to consider that maybe he isn’t a visionary and a genius.