Was trying to read a news story and… What fresh shitfuckery is this? Why do I now have to pay money to a company just for the privilege of not being spied upon and not getting your cookies that I don’t want or need? How is this even legal?

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, do you expect news to be free?

    Either pay for it by selling your data or with money, or don’t use their website.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh no. It’s not like that. They don’t even ask you about cookies any more.

    This is a payment so they don’t sell all your cookie data to their 1354 trusted data partners/advertising vultures.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I find it amusing that they “use cookies to give you the best possible experience”, but then ask you to pay to not have them.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Where’s the option where they send me their home address so i can mail them a baggie of my chili lunch liquishit?

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It asks to play DRM content but plays videos anyway.

    Their devs must be so sick of their business dept.

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It looks like the big buttons are “accept all” or “pay for no ads”, but the cookiescan still be tuned with the link under the “accept all”?

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The best part of this is you would need to give them your personal information to pay them, and you’d need to accept the necessary cookies for them to know you’ve paid when you access the website. 🤣🤣🤣

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      you’d need to accept the necessary cookies for them to know you’ve paid when you access the website

      Cookies that are required for and only used for operational purposes (like knowing if the user is logged in) don’t require consent.

  • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    A naive question of mine, but isn’t using a browser/extensions that silently/transparently blocks cookies (such as Brave, but not just it) enough to fearlessly click “Accept All Cookies”, since ultimately they would be pointless for the purpose of tracking (due to the browser’s own cookie blocking capabilities)?

    • ilikecoffee@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah it would. But as I said elsewhere, this is probably enough to be ‘too much effort’ for the majority of users, and definitely a lot more effort than it should be. I already know several people who habitually click accept all on cookie banners, and I know I have caught myself doing that a couple times too…