I just may…

Yeah no complaints on functionality! It’s great!

Ok so how about all those strikes his team levied on content creators?

There is one victim here until we know more.

Stick to child services and dont get into law.

No, I have remained purposely impartial.

Protip, don’t try and become a lawyer.

We have no evidence to sway us between “mom was worse than dad” and “mom is a victim”. (In fact the available evidence suggests mom was so bad that dads psychopathic character didn’t shine through as less safe from Mom than foster care. I’ve been generous to Mom given this and, again, not going into gender politics of custody battles…).

I understand you’re trying to be empathetic. I’m trying to preserve justice for a tortured, dead child. Until we don’t know mom wasnt worse, we remain impartial.

You may be right, mom may be a victim. But you may be doing a dead child a severe disservice. Withhold your judgement without facts present, please.

Was Dad’s cousin the DA? that changes things. We dont know. And until we do, we examine the available evidence.

Until more evidence is presented publicly, mom is not a victim. That doesn’t mean she can’t be, and I have left that window open. On purpose.

The known victim is a dead child. We proceed with respect to known victims so as to remain impartial.

I think without knowing why she lost the child, it’s not right to call her a victim before the child. For all you know, she was worse than him. Which, stands to reason.

Until I know, there is one victim. Your stance is conjecture. Mine is withholding judgement with reason. I won’t go into gender politics of custody and why there are red flags to begin with here; until we know why she lost custody to this (now) clear piece of shit and not to foster care…

There is one victim (dead child). And one culprit (the state).

Should the mother have been a decent mother, drug addicted but loving and providing, not abusive, etc, the there are two victims, and two counts against the state.

I am not going to jump to conclusions, especially when the available evidence (the fact that she lost custody to a deadbeat lunatic) suggests otherwise.

The mother could equally be a perpetrator or a victim. We don’t know yet.

Which victim did I blame?

There is one victim here. Pretty sure I didn’t blame the dead child.

What did this mother do to lose a custody battle to this piece of shit? Was foster care not the better option here?? Fuck.

Not to mention property taxes have skyrocketed in my area. The rent soar is not yet done soaring. People are just getting hit with these taxes now.

Every thread

Wait kdeconnect is Foss?! Can I fix the atrocious gui myself?!? 😂

That application rules but it looks like butt on my workstation.

🤫🕛

You must not be familiar with the three shells.

Brush my teeth.

Floss.

Masturbate.

7/10

10/10 with rice.

Discoverability issues as per yesterdays search giants methods of crawling the web.

It’s quite clear that companies like Google and Microsoft are vulnerable in the search game right now.

I mean in the end you’re probably right, but if there were ever a time for a well-funded group to take aim at the suddenly low barriered entry, I think this is probably Custer’s last stand.

Idk anyone who can’t figure this out deserves to die.

/s

My recently promoted boss just totaled his car.

He’s okay but YUP.

If it makes you feel better they were tiny compared to what’s at home depot

Their procurement policy is basically “has it been recommended? Is anyone else using it? Is it cheap?”

I work in public sector.

This oddly reminds me that the original patent for the chainsaw was for aiding childbirth.

I’ll let anyone curious enough google that.

Three things.

1. Yes. Sometimes this is malice. Sometimes this is an attempt to drive impressions and page views.

2. This can also be caused by poorly configured web applications that update in real time. If, say, some sports website is giving you real-time data about the game as it progresses, a poorly configured web application might be creating a dynamic URL for every change. When you access the older page, it will be instructed to take you to the most recent data, so pressing back is taking you to old data on that page, and then immediately realizing that data is old so refreshing it with the most relevant data.

3. This is a super common misconfiguration in single page web applications. Domain.com will take you to an application that renders at domain.com/en-us/home. Pressing back takes you to domain.com, and guess what happens next?

This is basically 99.99% of these cases. I would say if it isn’t on some shitty news site with 1000 ads that somehow sneak by AdBlock and UBlok Origin, it’s case 1. Otherwise, it’s case 2 or 3.

The picture instance is either case 1 or 2.