• twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The ruling class needs a very poignant reminder that their perceived value is entirely manufactured by the working class, on whose shoulders they stand. These people have no real value if the people they exploit are able exert their own agency.

    Fuck these parasites. And as a matter of course, fuck the foo fighters.

      • Phegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have to all work together to give those consequences. Workers need to act as a united force to push back against the ruling class. Checking out hurt the movement. Help us show them the consequences.

        • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          History has a way of repeating itself. Best we can hope for is a soft reset. It will always be this way until human avarice is somehow ejected from our genome.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of the people in those concerts are employed. They’ll have stock with Amazon, as does everyone working for Amazon on a full time, permanent contract.

          You do realise Amazon is a public company, don’t you? If your country allows fractional shares, you could become an owner of Amazon for £10.

          Is the “ruling class” anyone who has a report at Amazon?

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh well see that would actually require communication and commitment.

        We don’t do that. Something about needing that job that they definitely won’t pull out from under us to pay those bills that never go up.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The real question is, how many pee bottles did they force Dave Grohl to fill in order to make his song quota in time?

    • Duallight@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, all he did was accept money to do exactly what he does: play a concert. Now if he canceled other concerts just for this, that would be a different story IMO. The Amazon execs would just buy a yacht or something instead if Dave declined.

      • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah the ol’ “If I didn’t accept the money to do something unethical, then someone else would have done it.” argument.

        • Duallight@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I can see how it could be seen that way. I’m thinking more along the lines of “Dave performs for money. Someone wants to pay a lot of money for a special performance, and it doesn’t affect any of his other shows so of course he would do it”. IMO what Dave did isn’t unethical, but I can see how it could be seen that way. But I also think if the article was “Amazon Execs bought a multi million dollar yacht after massive layoffs”, no one would be blaming the yacht manufacturer. Just the execs.

          • zaph@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            no one would be blaming the yacht manufacturer

            I already don’t support yacht manufacturers. I own foo fighters albums. There is a massive difference in your example.

            • micka190@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Here’s a better one: If the Amazon execs threw a private party, no one would be blaming the caterers.

            • Duallight@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The yacht was a bad example. What I’m getting at is that not hating something is not the same as supporting it. I don’t support Dave doing this, but I don’t hate him for doing it either.

          • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Perhaps it’s not against Dave Grohl’s ethics but it’s certainly against mine so all I can do is add the Foo Fighters to the ever growing list of people or companies that don’t get my attention or money.

            To be honest I’m thankful all this stuff is out in the open as I’m saving a lot of money.

            I don’t shop on Amazon, don’t use social media, don’t eat McD, don’t buy Foo Fighters albums, don’t watch Will Smith movies, etc.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah, the piecemeal approach to becoming a hermit. Eventually you’ll just add literally everything to your “failed my purity test” list.

              • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know. Macklemore is a pretty stand up guy and will stand by his morals. Plenty of people ain’t selling out and plenty of people stand up for what they believe in.

                Kinda strange all the back lash for my choice here but y’all won’t give the same backlash for FF choice. Double standards much.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not talking to Dave Grohl, I’m talking to you.

                  Don’t expect perfection, or you’ll always be disappointed by people. Macklemore included lol

                • Fixbeat@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ah, I see. I was thinking he might have done something else and didn’t hear about it.

                • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  LMAO reading this IMMEDIATELY after replying to a… slightly different vibe of comment:

                  Beauty & strength through diversity [of thought]!

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe to defend Dave, he thought that he was just doing a concert for amazon workers in general?

    I’m sure they didn’t explicitly state that “this private concert is for execs only”

  • chakan2@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dave is making money. Don’t blame him.

    I quit a company for this. We wouldn’t give our star performers raises, but they somehow managed to pull off a 7 million dollar one week party for the whole company. It would’ve been something like 100k per employee had they just handed out bonuses.

    We lost a wave of talent after that and their stock dropped 80%. I’m glad I cashed out when I did.

    • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dave is making money. Don’t blame him.

      Tf kinda brain dead excuse is this?

      Acting immorally is okay if you’re making money?

      This is truly mind-obliterating stupidity.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        My guess is that the argument is that participating in society does not equal endorsement of the system we live in. This is how musicians make money. By playing music to who pays for it.

        That said, I myself am of two minds about them taking the money.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It absolutely does equal endorsement.

          I’ll make my life harder to avoid companies and people I don’t support.

          Have a fucking backbone and stand up for what you believe in. Why should we contribute to the things we abhor?

          Do you think you it’s justified perform for these people if they getting paid?

      • Lodra@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ya… being paid to perform isn’t immoral. Honestly, I hope he took a ton of cash from Amazon for the show.

        Amazon is the crowd doing evil crap. Their immorality doesn’t automatically spread to everyone they interact with. Especially, people that aren’t actually aiding their efforts. This one is corporate waste

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          FFs took a huge paycheck of blood money that they could’ve easily turned down. They’re in it too.

          • casmael@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah plus it’s not like they’re a new band desperate for cash and a big break - without doing any maths, I’m pretty sure Dave & Co. could easily turn down evert corpo gig that comes their way from now until forever, and still be out there living the high life.

          • chakan2@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes…I’m sure FF is intimately involved in Amazon internal politics. I’m sure they were made aware of every person fired to pay for their show before it was booked last year.

            It’s a gig. A highly paying gig. They don’t fucking care who’s in the audience.

        • zelifcam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is absurd. I can’t believe the amount of hate I’m seeing here. They did a gig. Fucking get over yourselves. Wow.

          • don@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d say you need a better grip on reality, but that would imply you had one to start with

    • Vash63@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      7 million could’ve paid 100k per employee? Impressive for a 70 person company to host such an expensive party then.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t blame him because he’s just “making money”? Might as well not blame the execs with that logic. They’re also just making money, right?

      • YMS@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        With this particular concert, no, they’re spending company money (which otherwise could have gone to employees) for themselves.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s not your average guy working to put food on the table lol. For someone of his status, his image being hurt from this is far more expensive than whatever they’re paying them for.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder when “selling out” or being called a “sell out” stopped being a thing. It happened during my lifetime for sure. Now basically everyone everywhere you look in the music business not only is one, but the public seems to not even consider it an option to not sell out, and I think most people dream of being able to be a sell out themselves so much they pardon others preemptively and almost instinctively.

      But like in this case, Dave Grohl is already a multimillionaire, does he really have to further prostitute himself for Amazon cash?

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          🤷 and maybe someone was holding his dog hostage until he performed, but that pic doesn’t look like someone who is having a terrible time fulfilling his label obligations

      • chrishazfun@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m kind of bewildered by it, like there wasn’t any expectations but this is the sort of thing a creatively spent band would do, one of their best (imo) albums came out last year they absolutely could’ve passed on this. I’m hoping they at least put on a dogshit show, “Corporate magazines still suck” on Rolling Stone type move.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It fell victim to the “gig economy”, now it’s less “Selling out” and more “Get that bag”

    • debil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dave is a businessman first and foremost. I wonder how Pat is dealing with this sort of shit.

  • AstronautOlympian@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t find much about this gig online, but the Setlist.fm page lists this as a ‘private event’ for Amazon Web Services.

    AWS is not the part of Amazon where employees have to piss in bottles. It’s their cloud hosting subsidiary, and the most profitable part of the company. I also can’t find any mention that it’s just the executives of AWS either. It seems more likely to me that this would have been open to the employees of AWS in general as it is the most profitable part of Amazon and the crowd in the pictures seems quite big if it were only made up of ‘AWS executives who like the Foo Fighters’.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article says what part of Amazon it was for. It’s for logistics, not AWS, which is a separate division.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Its a yearly event that collect directors and above fork across the company to a week long “convention” that is supposed to be about building cohesive between leadership.

      The author went in 2022, when they had bon jovi play, and said it was just a boozy networking event where leadership was dictated to by the execs with no actual exchange of ideas.

      In 2022, Amazon made a record profits, but even then they were admonished to save money. Still, no layoffs.

      This year? They also made record profits, but had record layoffs, yet the party goes on.

      The authors overall point is that Amazon is successful by asking people to “lean in,” to go the extra mile. When you freeze wates and layoff 10,000s of thousands while threatening more and still throw you 10 million dollar party for yourself, you are telling good people to not only leave, but to lean right the fuck out before they do.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    To think this is a problem with just Amazon is silly. This is every American corporation. The executives of every major corporation in this country treat themselves very very well on company dimes while their workers all languish in starvation wages. The only way to fight this is to raise the minimum wage to something that is livable for the average worker. The government needs to force these companies to behave. They will never and I mean abso-fucking-lutely never choose to treat their workers with respect and dignity by paying them a decent living wage.

    And the politicians that are in all of their pockets will never ever go against their corporate masters. The only way to make them listen is to get every single American to acknowledge that this is something that is needed and then push their politicians to do it or threaten their jobs by voting for someone else. This goes for both Democrats and Republicans, not quite equally but there’s definitely a few Democrats that need to be replaced.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only way to fight this is to raise the minimum wage to something that is livable for the average worker.

      Then what do you do when only the Amazons and Walmarts of the world with the deepest pockets can afford that, and small business basically ceases to exist, as a result? People talk a lot about ‘if you can’t pay a livable wage you don’t deserve to be in business’, but the same people also complain about monopolies and lack of choice at the same time. How do you propose this be reconciled?

      Also, no one’s ever going to be able to begin to enforce a “living wage”, even if they wanted to, until that wage is given a concrete definition–at the very least, a formula with variables to account for cost of living differences across the country. Until then, all this clamoring for a “living wage” is completely pointless.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      While you’re breaking your back, they’re getting paid millions to eat sushi off of a porn star’s back.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bentonville AR is being turned into a bicyclists haven. To the tune of Arkansas laws are making it that bicyclists don’t have to pay attention to traffic laws. That’s neat, wonder why… Ah. And while bicycling is one of the better things I guess billionaires can do, in the region buying bicycles are far beyond affordable anymore to a walmart wage because it’s gotten so over the top fancy, and the Waltons literally have a helicopter with a bike rack to fly out to the trails. My dad is irritated because of how often it shakes his house as it goes over.

      Same city, Alice Walton had a really nice museum built in the area that was surely out of the good of her heart… Ah. Unless really local, one might not know of her nickname “Drunken Alice” where she has a history of dwi’s and wrecks, including one where someone was killed, yet somehow nothing seems to stick.

      Yea… I’ve got a bit of an axe to grind with the Waltons having grown up in their personal playground, I agree with you to think this is a problem with just Amazon is ludicrous, and despite only living a state away it’s amazing to hear how people bitch about Amazon, it’s chokeholds, it’s problems, its wrecking of the country, and gives a full pass to Walmart. We live in an oligarchy.

      Completely unrelated to my bitching about Walmart, but a perfect example of execs doing this nonsense and how I got in trouble because I can’t stop snarking: Worked for a medical testing facility, ran by a doctor. Said doctor buys himself a brand new shiny Lamborghini, then through the whole email has an announcement that for one day for 4 hours where any of the staff can get a picture with the Lambo and share on the company page. Now I met said doc once during training, but otherwise worked 3rd shift with two other people, he certainly never showed up when we had issues.

      So when the day happened, it was one of those I commented it’s the first time I think I’m glad that 3rd shift gets ignored on any staff events. Think about it for a second, then ask the others “Who has the newest car?”, turns out was a Nissan Juke. So each of us go out and get a picture with the Juke, then sent the pictures in to where people were supposed to send in the pics with the Lambo. Turns out they got 4 pictures, the 3 with the Juke, and 1 with the Lambo. Got told by our manager said doc was pissed and to keep our heads down.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My last job, we removed two departments and fired them all, then forced to have a “virtual retreat” to save money. Three months later, they showed a PowerPoint how this was their best year ever.

      By that point, I was already looking for a new job.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You break your back for pennies while they get millions a second to eat sushi off of a porn star’s back.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The funny thing is that people always forget about old money - people who don’t know what work is or what actual money is. And who see billionaires as just mere peasants.

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a lot of old money where I grew up, and it was funny hearing about Blackrock trying to buy their properties. They would offer these people ten times the value, but old money was just “but, that’s just a little bit more money in the money bin. I have a massive house and estate to look at the peasants. Why would I bother?”

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And now imagine old money in Europe. For example, the British aristocracy owns at least 30% of land in England (that’s the official number, but Land Registry doesn’t have information about who owns 15% of land at all and it is most likely owned by aristocracy as well). And England has a leasehold system. So if Blackrock would come to a king or some lord to buy some of their land, the land would be sold to them easily as a long term lease, for like 100+ years. And then Blackrock would also pay yearly rent on top of that. Because you ain’t buying shit here, dirty peasant.

          Another thing to keep in mind is that old money here have their wealth for over a thousand years. They’re not simply entrenched, they’re a part of the fabric of the country itself. They have all kinds of exceptions in the laws and regulations and exist above everyone else not only in social status, but also in economic and political status as well.

          People can hate the rich as much as they want, but there’s a layer in the society which doesn’t care about the existence of the rich and the poor. And they are all related to each other through centuries of strategic marriages, so basically one incredibly large family spread across the whole of Europe.

  • zelifcam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bands do gigs. Everyone needs to relax. The amount of hate I’m seeing here for one of the nicest people who’s made it in the music industry is upsetting.

      • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Essentially, if you’re nice enough you’re allowed to do something bad once in a while.

        It doesn’t make sense.

    • ganksy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The hate is proportional to the level of betrayal people feel. These people are scum(Amazon execs). Dave and the band rewarded them with a special people only concert for being extra parasitic on society. Shame is not unwarranted here.

      • KRAW@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, I’m not exactly giving FF a pass here but rewarded is factually incorrect considering FF was paid to do the gig. The show wasn’t some free pat on the back for the execs doing such a great job.

        • ganksy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          True but it’s not like it was a life-changing payoff. If they didn’t do this gig they could have been paid for a regular gig.

          • KRAW@linux.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Again, not giving them a free pass. Just pointing out the terminology used is an overstatement.