pathological

I’m afraid this one is already taken, friend.

pics?

You can go fast again.

lol

Wow. Equally confident, equally confused.

The brain processes the information from the nerves.

How is it obvious?

Physical pain? Zero.

Did you think about this before you wrote it?

Motorcycle, actually.

So that’s who listens to this garbage…

Your timeline is straight up fucked. In short, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Imagine you are driving the bed

actually quite enjoyable, ty!

It was no trouble.

Why did you write this here?

I actually wasn’t being negative, but carry on.

I understand approximately half of what you wrote, but I see quite a few people upvoted you. Is this what dementia is like?

You gonna be there for a bit?

Do you think the existence of the Linux kernel might’ve had an effect on how Hurd was prioritized? Also, FreeBSD wasn’t too far behind, chronologically.

I’m not saying Linux is unimportant (or even less important), but I think some folks here are pretty clueless about the significance of widespread DVCS adoption.

You’re thinking in terms of a single dev using revision control, but the person you responded to was referring to the higher level aspects of software development that git facilitates. In other words, you’ve completely missed the point.

As for the Linux kernel, if it hadn’t come along, we’d likely be living in FreeBSD-dominated world. Or, perhaps Hurd would’ve received more attention.

Torvalds didn’t create git because he was passionate about version control systems, he created it because the existing solutions were not adequate.

Git is a distributed version control system (DVCS) that facilitated a fundamental shift in how people collaborate on software projects in general. So, comparing it to SVN and downplaying the significance of Git suggests you’ve kind of missed the point.

Edit: with you on the other thing though - fuck Windows.

You probably need to learn a bit more about VCS fundamentals if you think Subversion would’ve been fine.