• jeromyokc@lemmy.okla.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Saw a job posting yesterday to assist a contractor with installing a system used by police to monitor school camera feeds directly “to support law enforcement”. jesus fuck man

  • TheLoneMinon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    One thing I’m noticing in these comments, and in a lot of comments threads is the “well yeah, duh. Everyone already knew that” and while I’m definitely in that camp and have done that myself, I am starting to wonder if there is danger there.

    Like, this is a significant breach of privacy and trust and the kind of thing that we should be up in arms about. But we already assume the government is doing the worst movie villain shit imaginable, so when we have evidence of it we shrug it off as just another Tuesday.

    Yeah, waters wet. We should still be alarmed when we see a puddle of it somewhere it shouldn’t be. (I don’t know if that analogy actually tracks but I’m sticking with it).

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’re not wrong, but these days the number of members of the public that truly cares (to point of taking action) about privacy is an extreme minority.

    • Kirsche@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Puddle has been wet for a while, infact, it’s practically almost an inland ocean, why do you think we’re funding drone wars? Ai computing? Quantum computers? tactical robotics? Surveilence companies like Pegasus, Blackrock, Palantir, Even our our domestic surveilence is getting a larger check than defense. It’s a very deliberate “funding” of institutions that ultimately give the police an upperhand, not saying that the police are directly funding these institutions, but rather the state, although not much when it comes to anything outside the defense budget.

      There’s a reason why privacy advocates are for alternative tech, and that’s because since 9/11, corporations have become “lobbied” for lack of a better word, to include backdoors and implement certain tech to aid a surveilence state, such as the removal of headphone jacks, the endorsement of useless and extremely vulnerable tech that’s more energy wasting, blutooth products (yeah i have a problem with it, everyone should), fingerprint sensors, front and back facing cameras, artificial intelligence (yes even the older models.), and even going as far as to add metadata to photos that give your exact geolocation data.

      Don’t even get me started on the invasive software that comes with the tech, like auto generated albums, or auto editing photos, the such, it pisses me off that we let these things happen. Alternative tech makes it much harder to intercept such vulnerable information, ofcourse, it won’t completely stop it, but it mitigates how much they can swipe under your nose.

      Not only that, but check upon the “Blue Shield Act,” it explains the motive for corruption within the american institutions of police, hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. It’s the common trope for the kinds of psychopaths that would be okay with doing the job in the first place. If there’s one thing that makes their job easier, it’s definitely going to be you in cuffs staying silent, so why try to steer away from cutting corners? We’re the law, what we say is final. Until it isn’t ofcourse…

      But that’s the problem, as you state in your comment above, this abuse of power is shrugged off, almost as if a normal behaviour, expected. It’s digusting to see it even when i grew up around the same mentality. But hey, at least their method clearly seems to be working, we’re practically silent seeing as they still have the confidence to fuck with our lives.

      Just remember, it’s final until it isn’t.

    • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think you can just assume at this point the US government does not care about the constitution or it’s people and will use any means necessary to collect data on those who wish to counter its growing authoritarian nature.

      If you go to a protest, only take a burner phone or no phone at all. If you must take your phone, turn it off and Faraday cage it.

      The US has become a failed state. Leave if you can. Things will only get worse before it completely implodes.

    • kebab@endlesstalk.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Just a friendly reminder that China is still much worse than any flawed democracy when it comes to freedom

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Just a friendly reminder that less evil, even if true, is still fucking evil.

        • Plurrbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Agree! I have family in China, Hong Kong, and Saigon, and you are correct evil is still evil just in different ways!

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Reminds me of:

      Samsung: “Apple Bad! They removed headphone jack and the charging brick.”

      Also Samsung one year later: “sAvE tHe eNvIrOnMeNt 🤡”

  • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Exclusive BREAKING NEWS: After careful consideration by the World’s top scientists from 1000+ top Universities, it turns out that WATER, H2O, the Wet Wet is, in fact, wet.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Where is the “water isn’t really wet” guy!?

      Your comment is 8 hours old. He should be here by now!

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      No fucking way! I’m gonna need about 100 articles about that, all explaining the exact same thing, but slightly too dumbed down to the point that it doesn’t actually tell me anything.

  • cashsky@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Could AI be used to create a bunch of useless chatter in the airways that they would have to sift through and waste their time? Maybe use AI for actual good.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yes/no.

      The data processing capabilities they have will far FAR outweigh anything you can effectively achieve with AI spam at your scale.

      Even if you got thousands to participate, it wouldn’t really be all that much.

      Remember, these are agencies already doing data processing on social media, meaning they’re already setup to analyze billions of messages a day.

      Texting is so low volume it’s almost comical, and people that are trying to poison the well stand out and become easy to filter.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      IMSI spoofing is a product of wireless telephony being an ancient (way-pre-internet) technology, and we’re long in an era where law enforcement (or in this case law-enforcement coded) investigators don’t have to obey laws, such as assuring due process, and unreasonable searches disqualifying evidence. Instead they’re hunting political enemies, and every prisoner of the United States is now a political prisoner.

      It also means we don’t have to obey the law, and can start using all-frequency jammers in and around protests and ICE actions to level the playing field. (It will also interfere with regular infrastructure, but it’s not like ICE or the current regime gives half a fuck about that.

      All-frequency jammers are older tech and easier to build than IMSI spoofers, and are highly illegal since so much of our commerce and communications depend on radio. But the current FTC has also been captured and is failing to do its job.

      Any Amateur Radio enthusiast will know how to make a jammer. And current battery technology would assure you could make a handful that are portable and powerful enough to shut down blocks and blocks of municipal communication. This is playing pretty hardball, but then ICE isn’t playing by the rules.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It also means we don’t have to obey the law

        Not true. Even pre ICE. Law enforcement is allowed to lie to you, but you cannot lie to them. The playing field is not level.

      • Sawblade02@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        From an RF enthusiast,

        Wideband jamming will get a lot of attention very quickly and is extremely easy to triangulate with handheld hardware and a couple of hours of training. I’d recommended against doing that.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Hide them and trigger them remotely.

          Alternate between multiple devices and relocate every time you use it.

          I bet you could waste a lot of their time with this.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          At the point you already have a tense paramilitary operation clashing with protests in what is escalating towards lethal violence, I’m not sure finding wideband jammers will be the priority of responders in the area, at least not the first few times.

          Though in times of peace and order, wideband jamming is, yes, a big no-no.

        • jonesey71@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I understand it would be totally easy to triangulate if it were a single jammer, but would it be possible to triangulate a mesh of maybe half a dozen jammers. It seems like a headache to try to triangulate that because your signal strength would be all over the place.

  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    if you’ve ever used a radar detector you know, people drive like they are always being watched. not often in my experience. doubt these dolts are real sophisticated. fear is their main weapon.

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t understand the entire first half of your comment. The only explanation I have for how well received it was would have to be the last two sentences which resonated with people.

  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    yeah pretty much never trust a public wifi without vpn. bring your own router. cell data is pwned. technics aren’t in their curriculums.

  • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    So basically, one could go to ICE protest and troll with fake conversations about attack points and watch them scatter to control nonexistent issues.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m surprised it was finally acknowledged. The anamoliess were discovered in March and tested out at several smaller protests before the big ones.

    Burner phone, but the power of photography is necessary. Don’t get faces, which isn’t usually too hard as everyone faces a single direction.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I know this sounds crazy in 2025, but you can still buy standalone digital cameras. You can even get discreet devices that record constantly.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the idea behind a phone with a camera is that your can immediately upload what you’ve got in case some thug with a badge takes your device and smashes it