All push notifications go through APNS on apple. That’s Apple Push Notifications Service.
APNS requires the device to authenticate with it and can uniquely identify the device by an id. Its how it sends messages to devices.
Firebase cloud messaging acts the same way for true push notifications.
You don’t need to audit a device using APNS or FCM on Android to know that it is not anonymous.
Ya, for sure. My beef was just with people saying you can roll your own, but glossing over the reduced user experience and reliability if you do.
With those trade offs it’s absolutely doable and makes sense for certain situations.
Ya, it can be brutal on battery.
I worked on an app once where delivery was critical, so we gave them the option of the active service+websocket, but for them the trade off was acceptable.
Pushes can be pretty flakey given all the shenanigans OEMs do on the device, even when marked as high priority correctly.
And the even worse part is when OEMs reset battery saving flags the user had set to help pushes get through and they stop working one day because of it.
Every few trips to Costco already seems too often, but it is delicious.
They don’t treat their people like shit, they treat them like slaves. In countries outside China at that.
It’s actually not possible to build a push service like FCM or APNS on Android and have it function at the same level as FCM. FCM has special permissions to bypass certain device states on the device to ensure message delivery that nothing else can match.
The best you can do is approximate it with an always active websocket and a foreground service always running with battery optimizations disabled, but good luck not having that foreground service shut down on occasion as well. Devices are hostile to them for battery saving purposes. You’d have the best luck with a Pixel device though for something like that. You could also do some sort of scheduled background polling, but the device can be hostile to that as well, and it would eat more battery.
You don’t even need to audit a closed source app to know that Apple knows which devices its sending pushes to. It works because they know.
I think he thinks HE had to store the information, and if he isn’t the one storing it, it’s anonymous.
Except, on Android, you can also do it where only google stores the information and he doesn’t have to store any. And there are no user name or passwords or accounts involved to listen to specific channels like he claims.
You can collect this information, and you’d be able to write a more custom push service, but it isn’t needed at all, but Google and Apple will always know who is getting the messages.
Now GrapheneOS the privacy based Android OS is calling them out
https://bsky.app/profile/grapheneos.org/post/3lt2prfb2vk2r
He really must be thinking just about himself, and not that Apple had the info.
Just figured I’d add Apples own documentation as well
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/registering-your-app-with-apns
Apple Push Notification service (APNs) must know the address of a user’s device before it can send notifications to that device. This address takes the form of a device token unique to both the device and your app. At launch time, your app communicates with APNs and receives its device token, which you then forward to your provider server. Your server includes that token with any notifications it sends.
How do you suppose APNS knows which device to deliver the notification to?
Something that… links it to the device? Like, a unique ID that Apple can identify?
It sounds like he thinks HE has to store this information, which is simply incorrect. It will obviously be stored by Google in Firebase, and by Apple wherever that gets stored, but HE does not have to store it.
I write apps for a living. I have users subscribe and unsubscribe to channels, and at no point is there a user account with password involved in either iOS or Android. If you want the memory of which channels they have subscribed to to persist across uninstall/reinstalls or different devices, then yes, but for an app like this you don’t need to persist those settings.
At any point the government could subpoena who’s received pushes (or at least, who’s registered to) from both Google and Apple.
You wanna go to jail hosting that server? You want to be extradited from another partnering country to the USA for inciting violence? For accessory to murder if something went wrong?
How is the link indelible when it’s anonymous? This isn’t money that can be traced back to you once it goes through Tornado Cash, or if it was done on something like Monero.
Edit:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/attorney-general-pam-bondi-warns-092112825.html
“Our ICE agents, all of our federal agents who are working hand in hand on these task force[s] — our federal agents from the Justice Department could be injured,” Bondi said Monday on “Hannity.”
“He’s giving a message to criminals where our federal officers are. And he cannot do that. And we are looking at it, we are looking at him, and he better watch out, because that’s not a protected speech. That is threatening the lives of our law enforcement officers throughout this country.”
This dudes life might be fucked now.
But sure, no reason, just trying to shove blockchain into everything.
It’s a cool tech. Just to help others out, a very brief TLDR on it
You can only submit certain denominations like 0.01 Ethereum, which then gets shuffled amongst everyone else submitting the same 0.01 Ethereum.
Then you can’t trace back who’s 0.01 is who’s.
You can leave the money in the smart contract as long as you want to increase anonymity before withdrawing it.
Because the government can’t take it down, and the government will want to take it down, and the government would even try to issue arrest warrants for people who made it outside the US to try and punish them. This dude who wrote this is in danger now.
Web browsers are capable of self checking a smart contract for new transactions, it is totally possible.
Who reported it would be anonymous if they used something like Tornado Cash, or if a service was able to be built ontop of a privacy coin like Monero.
This is actually a spot where I think a public blockchain could work and it’s censorship resistant properties will be crucial one day.
The server is the blockchain, so it’s not hosted anywhere specific and can’t be taken down. It’s also a smart contract which ended up working in favor of the devs of TornadoCash where a judge overturned the sanctions on it since it was just immutable public code.
Now that Tornado Cash isn’t sanctioned, you could mix your coins through it to then pay the sub cent fee to post the sighting on one of the layer 2s like Arbitrium (the fee which will also help combat spam)
The app could then be open source (web/android/iphone) and monitor the blockchain for the sightings in your area.
The problem still becomes push notifications if it’s all being done locally… It would need to be your device itself monitoring. Apple is also bad about background processing, but it’s a better on Android, and especially easier if you don’t deploy to the store and can bypass some of the requirements.
This way incurs no hosting costs for the developer, no load balancing, nothing to be seized etc.
It does require adoption of something like Ethereum though.
I don’t buy it. There a small handful of them like her, and they just trade off who gets to act more centrist, but always leaving enough votes to pass the BS they want to pass. Its a ruse so they can keep winning their seats so people can say, see, she’s better than others.
What the actual fuck.
Not quite the same level as McConnell filibustering his own bill after the Dems supported it, but it’s close.
You don’t need a user account or password to receive a push notification.
You just need to have the app installed. The app can be configured by the developer to receive push notifications.
Elon has armed security guards… things won’t go well if masked men with no ID try to kidnap him…
Should be a spectacle.
Ice agent threateningly approaches person holding camera yelling at them to stop recording. While waving his hands around in anger his arm touches the camera person.
Charge: Felony assault on a police officer.