Need this nationwide. I hate having fees added on to the price of what I’m ordering.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Minnesota is currently working on a similar law to stop surcharges and just have a final price.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    On the tipping subject… it is just another way the well off designed long ago, to reinforce that the working class worked for them. Originally it was the business owner that they were targeting, to make sure they stayed dependent on the good graces of the elite. After all, back then most businesses were mom and pop shops. Now it is just out of controll, and used to increase profit margins as well as extract more cash from people who have trouble realizing the full cost.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “If it’s in the core price of the menu, there will be a pullback” in patrons’ spending, she told NPR shortly before the attorney general released the guidelines. "There are some people, I think, that are hoping that the restaurants will just absorb that cost, because we’ve seen people say, ‘Oh, it’s too expensive with the service charge.’ "

    If you add bullshit charges that are not added into the price on the menu, I don’t return ever. So you may lose a couple patrons initially but they’ll be back once they understand that is the general price. You will also get me back since there is no more possibility of bullshit charges.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      unless it’s previously posted clearly to see before I order, I’d just walk out and not pay, because that is otherwise called “fraud.”

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        They do post it but it is in small print on a random ass part of the menu. Not technically fraud but absolutely bullshit.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          We should all take the attitude that if a fee is hidden in any way, including fine print, it is absolutely fraud. There should be no tolerance for businesses trying to trick their customers.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh, so you mean people won’t order your food if they know what the real price is? Well… fuck you

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        More that sticker shock will keep people from ordering an appetizer with a main meal if everything is $2-3 more expensive than when they last visited

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This has been the case forever. Itemizing receipts for hotels is always a pain and at least my company’s expense tool has buttons for more than 7 different tax fields each night. It’s like filling out a whole spreadsheet it the nightly rate varies.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Unfortunately, govt is the cause of that, not the solution. Taxes are always separate since they vary by location and are defined by the local govt. but yes it’s also a problem when that local govt wants to join in on fleecing the tourists, and it’s by convention not part of the price

      • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but tax can always be figured into the presented price of things if businesses are required to do so.

        That’s pretty much the point of this type of legislation. Of course you need legislators who, y’know, vote to legislate in this way.

      • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah. It would be really convenient to calculate if the hotels just stood around in one spot for years so the taxes didn’t change every time someone got a room, but with them constantly on the move who could predict anything?

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This might be a weird question but when people tip for a good service, what exactly is good service?

    If I go to a restaurant I expect them to take my order, bring me the food and when I’m done bring me the check. That’s it. I want nothing else from them. Should I tip them for not spitting in my food or not stumbling and throwing it all over my clothes?

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My tip heavily depends on how full my water glass is kept and how long my dishes sit in front of me before they’re cleared.

      I don’t need chit chat or being flirted with, I just need my meal in a prompt and courteous manner, that’s worthy of 15-20% IMO.

      • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why is the price you put on a full water glass dependent on whether you got an expensive steak vs a cheaper pasta dish though? This is why percentages are so dumb.

      • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        So literally you say it’s okay to pay extra for a server to do their job, because the restaurant isn’t paying them enough?

        Hells no. I’m all for prohibition on tipping, because it WILL be abused. Just pay servers a normal salary like everyone else

        • S_204@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I literally say that I am fine to pay extra when I believe the service is worth it. I live in a country where servers earn above minimum wage typically.

          You do you, some people are cheap, some are ignorant some are both.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Should I tip them for not spitting in my food or not stumbling and throwing it all over my clothes?

      In the US, yes. Tipping here is insane.

    • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I usually don’t tip, as I live in a country where people don’t depend on the tip. And if they got a problem with that, they can take it up with management. I am not their employer. Also, I don’t get extra money for simply doing my job as well.

      But there are rare occasions, when I do. And that’s if I see that someone has gone unexpected “extra” lenghts, which can not usually be expected from doing the job.

      For example, in an italian restaurant my partner and I ordered some noodle dishes. We were there often, so we didn’t expect anything unusual. However, that day, the waiter just brought us some Parmesan cheese with the advice it tastes better with it and we shouldn’t be shy to ask for it. That was very forthcoming and justified a tip.

      On another occasion, when my partner had a hospital stay, we ordered some pizza. We did it once or twice, as the treatment took several weeks. Usually I went down to the building entrance and received the order. One day, there was an awesome delivery guy who took it up on himself to bring it to us to the patient room. We were very impressed. I remember that my partner said we should shower him in money, haha. We certainly gave him a nice tip.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If I go to a restaurant I expect them to take my order, bring me the food and when I’m done bring me the check. That’s it.

      I’ve been to a Michelin Star restaurant where a pair of waiters were constantly hovering over your table to clean it and refill drinks and offer provide conversation.

      The chef comes by and makes a presentation of every dish (the bananas foster was practically a magic act, the way they assembled the meal and then light it on fire). The staff practically wingman for you, if you’ve got a date. Everyone is beautiful and charming.

      But that was something like $300/person just for the table, with 20% gratuity as a fixed fee on the final bill.

      There are lots of restaurants that don’t charge through the nose for the meal but offer comparable service. Charming friendly waiters who weedle your favorite food and give excellent recommendations. Staff that sing or make clever jokes or entertain small children or share a cocktail with you at the table. I know a few high end restaurants in Houston that will try to pouch waiters from one another because they’re friends with particularly wealthy regulars.

      You see less of that now (at least in the states) because individual waiters are expected to cover more tables, turnover is more important than relationship building, and the quality of food has taken a real nosedive as we replace professional chefs with meals made in microwaves.

      Now a tip is much more like a Coperto - a cover charge for seating - than gratuity for exceptional service.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh wow that sounds awful. I already don’t like when they come check on me mid-meal about wether the food is good or do I need anything.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Eating out in Korea is great.

            You need more water? They either have a fridge of jugs, or a water dispenser.

            Side dishes are help-yourself; you just go up and get them. Unlimited and free.

            The person who makes the food is sometimes the person who brings it to you.

            No tipping, no tax added to the price you see on the menu, and no stupid prices like $19.99 instead of $20.00.

            And even after all that, the prices are still cheaper than the bare menu prices for me back in Canada.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          A good waiter who earns his tip will have the skill to recognize that you want to be left alone, and will serve you quickly and efficiently and unobtrusively. Good waitstaff will quickly figure out what each patron needs in order to have an excellent dining experience, and then will deliver that.

    • ChexMax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Good service is anything outside what you just said. Did you need to ask for any changes/ substitutions? Did you have an allergy they had to accommodate? Are you on a rush and they brought it out quickly for you? Are you splitting the bill? Are there children in your party? Did anyone leave a mess or did a drink spill? Were they extra helpful with recommendations? All these merit a tip. If they do exactly as you said and you were an easy customer, no tip needed (assuming you’re in a country where tipping isn’t customary)

      • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Did you need to ask for any changes/ substitutions?

        Waiter writes that down, forwards it to kitchen. That can be expected, imo. Kitchen doesn’t get your tip.

        Did you have an allergy they had to accommodate?

        Lol, “thank you for not killing me, here is a tip”. At least it can be expected to be informed about allergies. Regarding subsitutions, see above.

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not saying those things are morally worse or something, I’m just responding to OPs question about what merits a tip. I’m just outlining the etiquette.

          If you have above average service needs, that’s when a tip is appropriate. It’s not your fault you have an allergy, but it creates more work, so a tip is appropriate.

          Also it’s very common for waiters to tip out kitchen staff

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Friendly, prompt with explanations for delays and either a remedy or some form of alleviation of the disappointment, good recommendations/feedback on food, etc. a big one for me personally is coming over only when you notice something is needed (drink low, people looking around, etc )

      I’ll tip if someone does those kinds of things as it’s going above the basics I normally require

    • epique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      For me it usually about timeliness (I don’t know if that’s a word but it makes sense to me) and if our drinks a nearing empty they ask if we would like another rather than having to spend five mins trying to flag some one done.

      Simply doing the job quickly and professionally which for me makes my meal a little bit better. Also this is much more achievable for the staff if the restaurant has enough staff.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fees are predatory on people who are swayed by lower advertised cost. Basically, they are extorting the way many people’s brains work. It’s just another way to keep the not rich from ever catching up. Not just in dollars, but time. If you try to price compare, you have to sink a ton of time into uncovering all the fees. The rich just don’t have to worry about that. So it ends up as a time tax.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree that these fees are bad and I hate them, but couldn’t you make the opposite argument that they serve as a (money) tax on the rich? Poor people will take the time to shop around for the best deal, whereas rich people will simply pay whatever for the product they want. Therefore hidden fees disproportionately are paid by the rich.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, it’s always taking advantage of the ignorant or the hurried, regardless whether they can afford it. I shouldn’t require extra steps to avoid being ripped off

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is bad if you think a person’s value of their own time isn’t reduced to market dynamics. Yes the rich pay a cost/tax for the convenience, but that is because their time is valued more by the market. Poor people are compensated less for their time and that seems to make it “okay” to ask poor people to spend more time to deal with less honest business practices. If you think their free time is as “valuable” as anyone else’s then this is offensive.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s called a Bait and Switch and is a form of Fraud.

      It’s just that in the US, the grey area between Fraud and “Sharp business practice” is legally way broader than the rest of the Developed World.

      Kudos to California to have forces some clarification on at least this one form of misrepresentation/false-advertising/fraud.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    4oz smashed patty $17

    Add bun $1

    Add cheese $2-$4

    Add $1: lettuce, tomato, onion

    Add $3: grilled onion, any sauce

    Add $7: sauteed onionz melted cheese, sauce +bechamel, fried egg, kimchi

    Add $17: salmon

  • badbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah, Cali can shut its mouth. Tourists, look at your resort bill or hotel bill next time you pay. See if everything was baked into advertised price.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah… Maybe it should be that way for resorts or hotels too??

      Lol, what a weird take

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, that’s the reasonable take.

          Badbytes was siggesting that because hotels do this, restaurants should be allowed to do this.

          • badbytes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nah, it pisses me off when I travel to California for vacation. I was being sarcastic. Sorry for being confusing. :)

            • Reyali@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Every hotel I’ve stayed in—regardless of state—has had this problem.

              And if you read the first two paragraphs of the article, you’ll see the law actually applies to hotels as well; the article just chooses to focus on the restaurant part. So maybe your state-directed ire is misplaced.

  • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The restaurant owner arguments are all super weak as usual.

    “Menu prices will rise!”

    No shit, but everyone was already paying the prices but now you can’t just surprise patrons with the increase.

    “There will be pullback. People will lose jobs and hours!”

    Doubtful but even if true, that means that they knew they were lying to customers and clawing extra charges that they wouldn’t know about already.

    “‘They’ are thinking restaurants will absorb the costs”

    Not exactly but they will have to compete with pricing as it should be.

    They’re just trying to get away with playing the same game Telcos have gotten away with for far too many decades.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s what pisses me off, if the consumer knows what they’ll actually have to pay they won’t buy.

      They are arguing that they should be able to lie to the consumer and trick them. They think the consumer shouldn’t be informed to make a decision on what is right for them. And once again, they are putting the business before the customer.

          • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            From the same source, further down

            The existence of bait and switch schemes may also be evidenced by the following factors: whether in fact there were a significant number of sales of the advertised product at the advertised price;

            Adding on hidden taxes and fees is debatably not providing the advertised price. Maybe? I don’t know.

    • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What are the service charges that are being put on after the fact? From this I’m assuming it’s separate from the customary tip and any sales tax.

      • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Many restaurants have started adding a “service charge” that is not a tip in addition to menu prices. It’s super fucking shady. There is rarely an signage indicating the charge, relying of the hostesses to inform you. It isn’t always clear on the itemized bill they hand you, since it’s grouped down with the tax. It’s not the standard gratuity added for large groups. There is a restaurant near me that suddenly started adding this kind of charge. They did not notify me when I sat down and I didn’t see any indication of it on the itemized bill and only noticed when calculating the tip, after they’d run my card. I made a huge stink about it because it’s a fucking scam and they did discount my bill, but they refused to remove the service charge. I liked their food, but that was the last time I visited and I stopped recommending them.

      • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think what really kicked this off is that restaurants started putting surcharges on bills by directly passes specific legal requirement costs directly to the customers without increasing their menu prices. For example, now that servers get some health benefits in SF, they’ll have a surcharge that says something like “SF Mandate” or “SF Health Surcharge”.

        This would also cover stuff like to go order surcharges where some places are charging more for takeout sort of like Doordash or Grubhub do, except of course, you’re picking it up yourself.

        I do wonder how/if places with some more traditional surcharges are going to comply now. For example pizza places charging delivery fees.

        Places will still be able to get away with “X% gratuity added to bill for Y seats (though I’ve seen some places do it for any number of people, including 1)” because that’s optional, even if they put it on your bill because you’ve always been able to make them remove it.

        It is like on most people’s cell phone bills in the US. You’ll see stuff like “FCC surcharge” which is the company passing their FCC regulatory fees directly to the customer without changing their advertised prices for a plan, E911 fees for 911 services, various taxes levied on the company but not the consumer are also passed to the customer.

        The purpose is to have restaurants take these fees/taxes/whatever and make them build those costs of doing business directly into their advertised pricing on their menus. Companies don’t like this because they can advertise cheaper prices and psychologically the customer doesn’t usually think or even know about the extra surcharges, companies can set those surprise charges to whatever they want (they aren’t regulated) and they do not have to really compete with those prices wherever they advertise (menus, flyers, etc.) thus driving them down for the consumer.

    • experbia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Menu prices will rise!”

      nothing a bunch of two-bit con artists MBAs hate more than an informed mark customer.

      The actual good businesses run by good people will not suffer by this. only those that relied on duping their customers.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    One step closer to the fucking common sense of the rest of the world where the price you see for something is the price you actually pay. Nobody cares about a number that’s mathematically related to the price they have to pay, just tell me.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d really love it if they did like some countries and added the sales tax(es) to the sticker price in stores too

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are a lot of things I wished they did similar to other countries such as VAT. Hiding all these fees seems deceptive from both the business and the govt sneaking in their taxes.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Only fees that are entirely optional — like leaving a tip for staff — can be left out of the posted price.

    Wrong move. They should have outlawed tipping too. No more hiring for shit wages and leaving adequate compensation up to chance. Bump up the menu price and pay your staff an enticing salary.

    • gila@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Agreed, but overall a good move to address separate and much simpler issue of predatory pricing (for the customer)

      Heading to mother’s day lunch right now, set menu for $89 per person. Except it’s a 10% surcharge on Sundays, the only day that mother’s day is, so that price isnt really true at all.

      This in Aus which I’d normally argue has better common-sense policies such as requiring sales tax in the menu price

    • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You don’t need to ban tipping. Several countries don’t have a tipping culture and that’s because the waiters are paid adequately for their work. Tipping is seen as a bonus after exceptionally good service.
      The US should raise the minimum wage for restaurant workers and not make it the customer’s responsibility to make sure the waiter can pay their rent.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not disagreeing, just providing a counterpoint.

      Take your basic non super fancy restaurant, dinner for two with appetizers, entrees, desserts, a two rounds of drinks will probably be $100ish. And that table of two will be there for an hour. Assuming server gets 20% tip average, that’s $20 for the table. An average server will have four tables in their sections. That means if the restaurant is full, they are making $80 an hour in tips. They will get to keep 60% to 80% of that, the rest going in a tip pool that benefits kitchen staff, bussers, barbacks, etc. But they’ll still be making pretty good money.

      Of course if the restaurant is empty or they only have one or two tables with people seated, they are making less.

      The problem comes that if you get rid of this system, there’s a lot of financial risk for the restaurant owner. Currently they don’t have to pay the server or the staff very much, most of their compensation comes from tips, meaning there is less risk to them keeping the restaurant fully staffed if it’s not going to be busy. If you pay all these people are constant hourly, now there is risk on the restaurant owner in terms of staffing. Bring on too many staff when it’s quiet and they will lose a bundle. Don’t bring on enough staff when it’s busy and those people don’t have a financial incentive to bust their ass. It also becomes solely their job to ensure quality, because the server that spends half the time on their phone in the back room is making the same money as the server who is attentive to their tables. It also means less risk for hiring an inexperienced server, because if the server does a bad job they just won’t make good tips.

      All that said, I agree something has to change. I think perhaps one answer would be a law requiring that each restaurant put 15% of gross receipts into a virtual tip pool. That way they aren’t paying through the nose to staff and empty restaurant, there would be a line item on the check like ‘automatic gratuity paid the staff $whatever on this check, further tipping is optional’.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Servers deserve a lot more than minimum wage. Servers would generally not accept anything close to minimum wage, especially when with tips they can be making $50 to $100 an hour on a busy night.

          I am simply pointing out that it is difficult to compete with that.

            • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nowhere close to enough. What we pay teachers is fucking criminal. I believe teaching should be a respected and sought profession that employs the best. Unfortunately my impression is nobody is really taking education seriously, except for the handful of teachers that haven’t burned out yet.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        there’s a lot of financial risk for the restaurant owner

        Risk for the business owner, what a concept. The workers aren’t there to defray risks for an owner, they’re doing a job. If the restaurant founder wants to push risk to their employees, make it a coop, then they can share in the profits as well as the risk.

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        dinner for two with appetizers, entrees, desserts,

        Why on earth would someone go out for dinner, have two starters, and then jump to dessert? 😂

        • TheFlopster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just in case this isn’t a joke, then this is probably a country difference. In America, “entree” is synonymous with “main course”. I know, I know. That’s not what entree means. But the fact remains.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Huh? This might be a different wording thing. In the US, entree is another word for main course. So the meal I am illustrating is for two, has two starters, two main courses, two desserts, four drinks in total.

          • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Where the hell are you getting all that for a hundred bucks? I don’t even think you could get that kind of meal at Chili’s for that price.

            • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I was trying to find what would generally be considered a minimum price in most places. Sadly these days, dinner for two is more like $120 to $150

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Agreed. I hate tipping. Some tippers will hate for tipping to go away because they can use their charisma to make a lot of money. More power to them but tipping is just a way for these businesses to keep their labor low. Many other countries don’t have tipping and can still have restaurants. For some reason the US needs tipping to be able to have restaurants.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Some tippers will hate for tipping to go away because they can use their charisma to make a lot of money

        The funny thing is even if restaurants are forced to pay a living wage and not have tips as a subsidy, these servers would actually still be able to do that. Maybe not AS much as before, but between that and an actual living wage is bet they still would come out ahead lol

        • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          A lot (not all) of workers in the service industry like tipping, actually. They get cash a lot of the time, which they like, and can under report on their taxes. Most people opposed to banning tipping, in my experience, are actually the people receiving the tips.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I do wonder how much that’s changed over time. As more of us use only electronic payments or credit cards, that has to reduce the opportunity for tax fraud (same with panhandlers - I literally don’t carry any cash I could give you, so now what?)

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            And yet many of those people are also the first to complain about having inconsistent paychecks. Funny how that works

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Something tells me these same workers wouldn’t like tipping so much if people didn’t feel obligated to tip under threat of food tampering (real or imagined) or other threat/shame tactics.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not a California resident but once on a visit I ate at a place. Paid the bill. No tip. Left. The shopkeeper chased me on the street to catch up and ask why I didn’t tip, and wasn’t the food good, etc. Embarrassed, I was with a friend who is a resident… I told her yes it was fine. “Then why no tip?!” Internally: Because it’s a tip? I didnt get some kind of exceptional service there. If anything they left us alone really. So what was I tipping for exactly? why not just charge a different price, etc. Externally: “Oh I’m sorry. I didn’t know”

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but you know how the system works, so you intentionally stiffed someone out of their income. Regardless of if the system is correct or just it exists and you don’t get to just opt out without being a gigantic asshole.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Why not? If the waitron is counting on an “optional” tip and doesn’t get it, maybe they have more incentive to insist on fair pay or move along. … that’s what I say to myself , anyway, as I’m leaving the tip

        • bean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ok… Thanks for your input I guess, but as a European, the practice of tipping isn’t ingrained in my culture as it may be in yours. Frankly, I find it bizarre and from the outside I also see many in your own culture find it bizarre also. If not downright predatory of businesses on customers.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      A restaurant in my area recently put up signs saying they pay their staff a living wage, raised prices, and forbaid tips. More like this, please.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        A few places in Seattle experimented with different ways to go tipping when the city raised the minimum wage across the board without making an exception for tipped wages. A few forbade tipping a few had a standardized tip percentage. A few had a surcharge added on. Many made it clear how they did it. Shitheads like Tom Douglas did not make it clear and added a 4% charge on the bill noting that it was a living wage fee. I don’t go to the ones who were shady about it. Largely it has all returned to standard typing. There are a few coffee shops like Seattle Coffee Works and an ice cream shop (Mollie Moon’s) that do not allow tips.

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Add to that the fact that he was one of the big proponents against paying tipped workers a minimum wage.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        They won’t make nearly as much as they did with tipping. I expect either tipping to come back to that place or the servers to leave for somewhere better.

      • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Meanwhile, most places in London pay at least the minimum wage (not lower for waitstaff, but not necessarily living wage) and tack on an optional 12-20% service charge, and don’t give it to staff.

        You have to determine if the service charge goes to staff, awkwardly refuse the service charge, and (optionally) tip your waitstaff in cash (and if you do, ask they split it with back of house)

        The times we’ve done it seems to make the staff happy. Still a shit thing to do.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Definately how it should be, but staff at most places hate that idea. They know they’re making way over what they should be for the job, and they like not reporting all their earnings on taxes.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Only fees that are entirely optional — like leaving a tip for staff — can be left out of the posted price.

    How do you say you’ve never worked as a server without saying you’ve never worked as a server?

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Servers are paid below minimum wage because they receive tips.

      Not true in everywhere. For instance Washington requires servers be paid the full minimum wage of $16.28/hr before tips.

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Work a Sunday brunch shift and watch the raft of churchies leave nothing but condescending notes, if anything.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Parties of 8 or more often have gratuity on the bill like this. It’s rare to see it otherwise, unless there’s a particular reason (like they know these people never tip).

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It gets worse than that.

        Some of them leave these on the table. Carefully concealing the deception, of course.

        That’s not even the only type they have available to them:

      • wavebeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Holy shit. They give god 10% of their income. This server is “asking” for 18% of the price of their bill. They’re not even remotely the same thing.

        I’m generally against tipping, but still do it. I’m way against illogical comparisons like this though.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s called tithing. It’s described as giving 10% of your income or possessions to god in the Old Testament.

          • wavebeam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m aware of tithing. I’m saying that 10% of your income in a tithe is not even remotely the same thing as 18% tip for a single purchase. It’s more comparable to a sales tax than a tithe. One is percentage of a total income, the other is a percentage of a purchase.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Restaurants should be forced to pay their workers a living wage, which is how it works in developed countries. And paying below minimum wage should be illegal.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Agreed. Each state differs on tip allowance. In NY, minimum wage is $15 per hour with a $5 tip allowance. That means employers can pay $10 per hour, expecting servers to make at least $5 per hour in tips. If it’s a slow morning of “coffee only paper readers,” it’s easy to come up short of minimum wage for some hours.

        • Drusas@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, and that’s a problem. Tip allowance shouldn’t be a thing. They should be paid a higher base wage. Yes, a lot of servers would dislike that because they make a lot of money in tips, and they often don’t report those tips when it comes to tax time. But that doesn’t mean that the system wouldn’t be improved by eliminating tipping and increasing wages, like they do in the rest of the world.

      • _number8_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        it’s such a fucking joke that they’re allowed to pay like $2/hr because they’ll make it up in tips. just because customers are nice doesn’t mean the employer should get off the hook like that. even the joke federal minimum wage is fuck all, that’s like 1-2 sides at a decent restaurant

    • motherr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They might not live in the US. There’s plenty of countries where tipping exists but is actually optional.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t take the downvotes too seriously. Your original point was succinct and poignant. On average, lemmy bombs on anyone going against the popular stance. A whole lot of paper activism goes on here.

      Your point is valid. Not tipping because “fuck the man” only serves to hurt the servers. From a moral consumer standpoint, there’s no winning. You either cut out restaurants entirely, which still fucks the wait staff, or you tip high and hope enough of it ends up in the their pockets.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not offended by downvotes, but usually if I’m downvoted there are comments that correlate so I can understand the alternative perspective. Most of the comments in response were servers at first, so I edited for clarity thinking it was a misunderstanding. It took several comments for me to learn that California pays their servers a decent minimum wage.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m downvoting because he’s wrong about servers getting paid below minimum wage in California. That’s true in his shithole state but not ours.

  • I realize when I go out for a special event, like I did Friday night to see Harry Connick, Jr. play with the Boston Pops at Symphony Hall that I wasn’t going to quibble about costs.

    However, after the non-optional 18% “gratuity”, they also had an additional “server” tip field. Ha, GFY, bitches!