• andybytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I wonder if this is gonna be like Waymo, where statistically speaking, the amount of cars that they had on the road, with how many crashes they had, it was deemed ineffective and dangerous, but as soon as they reduced the cars on the road they had less incidents because less odds. At this point, they probably continue to suck up subsidies and donar $ so they keep their little goofy business afloat. So what happens now? When It crashes into a school bus, who is held accountable? This is not a good idea. We need to tax the rich and corporations shouldn’t have so much power. We didn’t ask for this future. Anybody with a damn lick of sense knows that this is a stupid idea. Also, why? Like, just make more trains. America is so stupid. The fact that you just fight over cars versus walkable cities. I am actively trying to find a way out of here. These are horrific insanely stupid ideas. It’s like doing it the hard way because you’re too prideful to admit that you have a shitty infrastructure.I have seen Europe, I have experienced it, and it is far superior to the shitty infrastructure of the United States. I was born in America. I lived in America, but I do not identify with this way of life or culture. My head spins with just where people’s minds are at in this country. How little they know. It’s terrifying. If you’re out there, just know. It is better elsewhere and chase those goals. You’re not crazy. There’s a better world. Not perfect, but a better world out there. Leave if you want to leave, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Great, just in time for the number of shipments of imports needing to be distributed across the US to plummet…

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    What an incredibly infuriating waste of effort that would be so much better spent on trains, driverless or otherwise.

    • Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I disagree. There are many situations where a truck is better suited for transport than a train. The US already has a pretty large freight train network. I agree that there definitely should be more investment in rail as well, but there’s no reason for both not to exist at the same time.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    And how do they handle a person slowing down in front of them and hijacking them? At least a human might be able to navigate away aggressively but I think the programming would prevent as much harm as possible.

    This new lawless future and we may need to raid corpo lords.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I think the programming would prevent as much harm as possible.

      well, yeah… why wouldn’t you want a human to do the same thing??? you’re watching too many fast and furious movies.

      Firstly, no one in an 18 wheeler loaded with cargo is “navigating away” from anyone desperate enough to attempt such a scheme. This entire idea is ludicrous, think about how slow and massive those trucks are.

      Secondly, you don’t want an 18 wheeler loaded with cargo being driven aggressively. You’re just escalating the risk of killing yourself and everyone around you, for what, a truckload of insured corporate assets?

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I can’t really imagine people wanting to hijack a truck that’s basically a giant camera and tracking sysystem.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I dunno I can see it being done, go in first with a drone and blind the cameras one by one (not hard to rig it up with spray paint) then grab the goods, pick an isolated section of the route so you’re gone by the time anyone comes looking.

        I for one predict a glorious era of road pirates.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          If they unloaded the goods to another truck really fucking fast, maybe. Otherwise they’re just being recorded on top of a giant GPS beacon that’s alerting a system that something abnormal is happening so rally nearby law enforcement. It’d way easier to hold up a bookies, with a shotgun, Saul.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Honestly, sounds like the corporation’s problem. I’m more afraid for human lives than some product in the back. In a case like that it’d be better to not have a driver who could be killed.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Driverless does not meant unmonitored. Aside from numerous sensors, including door sensors, you really think if it suddenly slows to 0 mph at an unscheduled time/location that it’s not going to alert someone? “Hey, your freight just stopped transporting itself. Guess we should do nothing”. Aside from most of these being ready to be taken over by a remote driver if need be for liability and convenience reasons.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Terrifying.

    I wonder how much our car insurance will go up due to this.

    • Molecular5869@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I get that you’re scared about multi ton vehicles running without a human. But self driving can and actually be safer than human drivers sometimes. Yes, self driving vehicles can cause devistating accidents in situations where a human driver would have handled the situation much better. Sometimes they can just bug out, which seems particularly dangerous, but we also need to consider who they’re replacing: Humans. Humans get tired, Humans text & drive, Humans blink, Humans Yawn, Humans do drugs, Humans sometimes just don’t pay attention. Because machines don’t have any of these factors, they can statistically be much safer, of course assuming the technology is ripe enough and thoroughly tested before it’s used.

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I vaguely remember a dystopian book that described that exact thing as the protagonist thinking he was looking at an odd flag on the front of the truck until he realized what it was. Can’t remember what the book was though 😔

    • SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Same. Our government can’t even figure out a way for us to trigger a green light so I’m not confident that any self-driving vehicle regulations will consider us either.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Large neodymium magnet on the bottom will do it. Most are induction activated. They taught this in every motorcycle driving class I ever attended, along with the rules for legally running a red light.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well yeah, they have to move over the sensor loop. You can’t just place it in the center. It’s part of a process that happens as, you know, you pull up the the light. They are a little fancy.

        • pirat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          That way you’ll also automatically collect all sorts of valuable metal treasures along the route. For free!!

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Heh, I got hit by that stupid thing today. Luckily the crosswalk button was right there, so I ran over and smacked it before the traffic signal cycled again.

        • SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’ve heard of people doing this but my strategy is to just wait until it’s safe and run the red light or go right and bang a uey.

          • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            I couldn’t do that on my 49cc scooter 😅.

            I’ve got a 1980 Honda XR500 as well, but it needs some work (and tires, badly) before it’s roadworthy again.

  • Omega@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Even in a hypothetical best-case scenario world, unless you have a driver on board any malfunction and you’re delayed 2-8 hours because there wasn’t a person in there to repair anything

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        A lot. Most of them do a lot of basic maintenance and break-fix work themselves.

        • GluWu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Lol, no they dont. This is such reddit shit. Say something people will believe for the updoots because they have zero clue.

          Your average driver is lucky to have a bat to check tire pressure. All the old guys that know how to work on their rigs are now too old to do it, or have enough money to just call the roadside desiel mechanic. 90% of drivers don’t own their rig, don’t give a shit, and are taught to just call the company to send a mechanic.

          • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah, I’m a driver, and I replace lights and fuses, fill up tires and fluids, change wipers, and that’s it.

            Anything else wrong, it’s mechanic time.

            • rigamarole@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 days ago

              Nailed it. If you don’t, you’re stuck waiting on service to replace those menial things for you, putting a 2 to 8hr dent in your workday, delaying all of your schedules. Source: operate a small trucking company.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    As of Thursday, the company’s self-driving tech has completed over 1,200 miles without a human in the truck.

    That’s not an impressive number. That’s like 2 days’ worth of driving.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s 5 one way trips. The article says the trucks run from Dallas to Houston which is about 250 miles according to google. It does mention that over 4 years it’s made 10,000 deliveries but I wasn’t sure if that meant as a company or with the self driving trucks but had a driver in the truck for the 10,000 deliveries. It only specifies that the 1,200 miles has been done without a person in the truck.

    • suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Yeah that’s about 2 and a half round-trips between Dallas and Houston, that’s…not a lot to be calling this thing ready to go and pulling out the safety drivers.

      I wonder how these handle accidents, traffic stops, bad lane markings from road construction, mechanical failure, bad weather (heavy rain making it difficult/impossible to see lane markings), etc.

      You’d think they would be keeping the safety drivers in place for at least 6+ months of regular long-haul drives and upwards of 100k miles to cover all bases.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        You’d think that, but you’re talking about Texas, where corporate profit always wins over people’s safety and well-being.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        The one article I heard on TechLinked talked about them using lidarr.
        So better in every way than a tesla.
        Assuming they are top mounted, they have a better scanning coverage than a regular car.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Hmm, I thought they were using ligers. I’ll have to go back and read that again.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        It would be more interesting to know how many miles they completed with the safety driver in the vehicle.

      • GluWu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Most rigs go at least 1,000,000 miles and that isn’t isn’t even end off life. You’ll be paying not much less than new for a rig that only has 100k, that’s practically brand new. These systems should have 100 million proven miles. These things weight 80,000lbs which can be very hazardous materials.

        You should see the pile ups semis cause in low visibility. Even with really good lidar, I hesitant to say autonomous trucks can be safe running off independent systems on full mixed use roads.

        We could add those systems to all roads to feed back to semis to know conditions and hazards miles before they reach them. We could build new smart roads for all autonomous vechilce to travel on separately.

        Or we could just end the 100+ year old railroad cartel. Could move people and cargo with ease. But that isn’t profitable.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        That figure is without a human in the truck, not with a safety driver. I.E, they’ve done a bunch of testing beforehand.

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Its enough to prove the concept.

      If it saves 1% of operating costs trucking businesses will be falling over themselves to implement it.