US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China’s space program::undefined

  • rab@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    While US youth are rotting their brains via china’s tiktok, Chinese youth are actually learning about science and other useful skills. Of course this is going to happen

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wait. This is a joke right? You really think all youth in america is just messing around on tiktok (yeah just forget facebook, twitter, myspace, instagram and whatever other social media we’ve had) and ALL youth in china is doing science?

      • rab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        No but I do believe this is the intended purpose of tiktok

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Who would have imagined that decades of funding cuts and pressure to rely upon Musk would allow another nation to take the lead? (Sarcasm)

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    They must have made some huge advances since the last time I checked in on them because they haven’t exactly been considered sophisticated in the art of rocketry for a couple centuries now. They first had a person in space in 2003 and they’re still using the same Shenzou line of rockets since that time. They’ve had some controversies about where their boosters are landing and covering people with Hydrazine which is also an outdated fuel type, imo.

    • Argonne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah you missed the part where they have a fucking space station and a growing private sector of reusable launch vehicles that are copying SpaceX.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        We’re impressed by a space station? What is this, 1976?

        I’ll admit it’s an improvement over their situation before the early 80s where 88.7% of people in China were below the poverty line.

        • Argonne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yeah, a space station is actually pretty impressive given that no other country besides the US and Russia have one, and that will be gone by 2030 with no plans for a replacement. If you don’t think a Space station is impressive then you’re very ignorant. So in a few years China will have the only space station in space. They launch multiple rockets per week while the US just has SpaceX launching at a similar cadence. Go stick your head in the sand if you want, but outside of SpaceX the Chinese have a better space program and just saying “we did it x many years ago” is completely irrelevant to today. All of the tech isn’t here anymore. There is no space shuttle. The SLS is a boondoggle that will never fly after a few expensive Artemis missions. ULA is basically bankrupt and trying to get sold. Boeing Space is a disaster. Today is what matters and I believe Chinas space program is in a much better place than ours. Today. It’s a result of attitudes like yours that handwave away anything that China does and leads to stagnation and complacency and corruption

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The ISS was designed and built in various countries across 4 continents in the 80s and 90s, I would hardly call it only Russia’s and the USA’s. I honestly respect India’s Aerospace more than China’s current level of technology. Even the UK, who historically have had no interest in the field, are in the midst of planning 2 massive Space Ports in England and Scotland.

            I’m not dismissing the failures of USA Space Program, it’s so inefficient to its core that Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos each started their own rocketry firms that blew conventional compartmentalized industry pricing out of the running. I’m just striving for accuracy of Chinese Failures. They’re not currently neck and neck with us, at all. When they figure out how to make coal powered rockets, then maybe I’ll sweat a little, lol.

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    US: continually decides to not fund scientific exploration of space

    Also US: GUYS! BE AFRAID! ANOTHER COUNTRY DID DECIDE TO SPEND MONEY ON IT! NOW WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO IF…UM…WELL, I GUESS IF THEY TAKE OVER SPACE…? Or…wait, what are we concerned about? Ah, fuck it. Cut NASA’s budget again. We got genocide to fund and taxes to cut for the wealthy.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same with Republicans and the border.

      “Do something about the border!”

      “Ok, we need funds. Please give them to us.”

      “No! Do something about the border!”

      “We can’t because you won’t give us the money.”

      “Too bad! Do something about the border!”

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Didn’t Biden agree with those idiots that the border is the most important issue of the day?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes. And now we’re going to have two senile coots yelling “He let the illegals in!” back and forth at one another as we stumble into another national embarrassment of an election season.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Probably. I don’t remember. I do remember them screaming that something has to be done about the border, then the Democrats gave them virtually everything they asked for on the border and Biden said he would sign the bill, but then Trump told them not to agree to it because it would hurt his campaign and they shot down the bill that would have given them what they wanted.

          And the really sad part is that half the country, at least half the country, doesn’t even know.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yep, you have a ghost president calling the shots for half the elected representatives, and the current president condoning a genocide. Really no winning.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Remember when you just told me that I support genocide by existing because I haven’t rioted?

              Maybe you aren’t the best person to be talking about this. Because apparently you think around 8 billion people support genocide.

              • Nudding@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’m sorry that you’re having so much trouble with this thought process. Good luck with the genocide.

                • orrk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  my god, like, could you stop using the genocide logic to do this shit? you see “the people in Gaza deserve to be targets of a genocide because they didn’t rise up against Hamas”

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I’m not having any trouble at all. You believe my lack of death means I support genocide, unless I do the things you’ve said. And since you claim I already support genocide, you must know for a fact that I didn’t do those things you said.

                  Therefore, I support genocide by existing.

                  Are you going to pretend you didn’t write what I pasted above?

                  Honestly, I’m just waiting for you to tell me to kill myself. That’s the next step.

  • TakiMinase@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Export all your technology and jobs to cheaper labour to make more profit. Now you will slowly become bankrupt, as no one can afford the enshitification products and services.

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If they were truly concerned, they’d start giving it the funding it deserves.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They’ve tried everything except actually funding NASA, and they’re all outta ideas.

      NOTE: China WILL overtake NASA, the same way they are dominating the renewable energy sector — because they invest heavily in science. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand this shit.

        • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Unfortunately that company is the best hope we have to stay ahead. With their low cost they can monopolize the worldwide launch market(except Russia and China). So that funding, strategically, must continue.

          What should also happen is funding spacex competitors, so we stay on the bleeding edge.

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I came here to say exactly this.

      Perhaps a space race with China would rekindle the motivation for our money grubbing demagogues to actually fund it.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, it won’t. They’ll just relocate to China, or maybe a super yacht out in international waters. They’ll continue milking every last cent out of the US until it’s a dead dried up husk of a nation and then they’ll just move to the next one. Their supporters are too stupid to realize where the end of the path they’ve been told to walk is going to take them, and they’d rather blame anyone else but themselves for all the problems they face. So no, a space race with China won’t fix shit.

        • demesisx@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Judging by the state of the US, you’re much more likely to be right than I am, you cynical bastard!

          😂

    • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That goes double for our educational system, which has been aggressively gutted by the GOP: People aren’t just born engineers and scientists.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    One can only hope.

    The last time that happened, we explored the moon and developed the space shuttle program. We got microchips and memory foam.

    Ideological rivals encourage congress throwing money into big science. Apollo returned $14 on the dollar. It’s a good investment.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    So they had no issue relying on Russia to service the ISS ever since they shutdown the space shuttle, but now they’re afraid of China… doing space science faster?

    Ignoring the fact that this is not even a real concern, maybe don’t spend morbillions on free munitions for Israel or Lockheed’s next stupid idea.

    They defunded NASA so hard that they started hallucinating about going back to the moon with 15% of the Apollo budget.

    • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      At the time, Russia wasn’t as……problematic. We had been working with Russia as an International Partner since the very early days of ISS and even during Shuttle/Mir.

      Obviously they did become problematic, but we didn’t have other options until SpaceX. Now that’s….obviously got its own issues, but Russia is vastly different than China when it comes to space. Russia needs the money, China already has it.

      • N00dle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The fact that NASA had to rely on Roscosmos in the first place is shameful. It highlights long standing issues facing the space program. I think some of these problems trace back to the cost of the ISS. It’s been hard to convey the importance and investment into the future the station provides.

        For China their station provides proof of concept that they can achieve similar results one day both to themselves and the world watching.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Gee whiz, maybe we should have been properly funding our space program all of these years instead of wasting it on making the military industrial complex filthy fucking rich and the world less secure overall?

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      People behind the scenes are siphoning NASA space research money and turning it into space profit instead. The growth of private space companies starting in the US is no coincidence. Blame oligarchs for steering the country into a dead end.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hate on spacex and its competitors as much as you want, im not saying you dont have cause.

        But defunding NASA caused this. Those billionaires looked and said holy shit, the entire nasa budget is only that much? And they arent building rockets anymore? I can literally fund my own space program? Ide be crazy not to

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      To be fair, it’s not as if those things are mutually-exclusive. For example, you know how the Hubble Space Telescope is this extremely unique and nigh-irreplaceable scientific instrument that cost a pretty big fraction of NASA’s entire budget?

      Well, it turns out we actually have dozens of the damn things; it’s just that we couldn’t be bothered to actually point more than one of them away from Earth instead of towards it.

      Hell, a decade ago the National Reconnaissance Office gave NASA a couple for free 'cause they just had 'em lying around, but (as far as I know) NASA hasn’t managed to scrounge up enough money from the couch cushions to spruce 'em up and launch 'em yet.

      • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They certainly don’t have to be, but there is a well established pattern of the US government getting waaay too chummy with corporations to the point that it can undermine what’s best for the people in pursuit of corporate interests.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Especially stupid considering last time they gave the space program appropriate funding, it led to a lot of advancements that the military industrial complex could use.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You make it sound like the military advancements were an unexpected byproduct, as opposed to the real goal.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The goal was optics. Kennedy didn’t know what advances would result from Apollo. He wanted to show that the US was better at science and technology than Russia.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The science of putting a ballistic payload anywhere, including heaven.

            The space race was awesome because it let the two countries measure their dicks (specifically their military dicks) without actually obliterating the planet.

            The “for all mankind” angle was a great way to frame things for the population of Earth, for sure. But just like mobile chemical WMD labs in Iraq, sometimes the given justification and actual justification are two different things.

            Don’t get me wrong, there absolutely were beneficial optics. Something doesn’t have to just be for one thing. But it was always primarily about practical demonstration of weapons capacity under the facade of human exploration.

            • RedFox@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I don’t disagree, but has anyone found corroborating evidence or documentation, past speculation and reasonable assumption?

  • aew360@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is a good thing. Competition with the USSR made NASA what it is.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Don’t worry guys, the US Space Force will make sure they are prevented from entering space.

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    We all live on this rock. Floating through space.

    Anyone who doesn’t want to spend more time looking out is someone with something in their closet you don’t want to look in.

    Ad Aspera Ad Astra

      • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        theythey have the qote mixed up its Ad Astra Per Aspare, To the stars through dificalties… you see it everywhere in Kansas

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        well, I think he meant: Per aspera ad astra

        just remember that almost all older languages had fewer nouns and verbs, so “thorns” here is referring to difficulty and obstruction

        so more meaningfully translated, this old Latin saying is closer to “through great treachery is the path to the stars”

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Their station has like three modules (with plans to add 3 more) and capacity for 3 people. The ISS has at least 16 modules (maybe over 30 depending on what you count as a module) and capacity for over a dozen people.

      Like many things from authoritarian countries, it looks nice but isn’t even close in terms of capabilities.

      • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Authoritarianism is not equal to capabilities. In fact, the Soviet space program was significantly more capable for a very long time

    • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They are likely going to fund it less and give more and more of its mission over to space force and private companies is my guess

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That would also work.

        The only thing that won’t work for space is the thing we’re doing now:

        • Maintaining a vice-like government control
        • Using that government authority to choose not to move forward

        Progress only stops under a narrow set of conditions that need to be actively implemented by the government. Progress is actually natural, and progress stopping requires enormous centralized effort to interfere with people getting things done.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Theoretically private programs would be an increased cost over a NASA only program since private companies want a profit margin.

            But Congress being what it is tends to require NASA programs to create jobs in a lot of different voting districts across the country which leads to an insane amount of inefficiencies.

            We can’t have nice things because of pork barrel politics.

            • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Private Companies however have no insintive to actualy innovate, if you look at them they are all taking decades old NASA and USSR Space program tech and resuing it … and callling it innovation

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If we fold it into the space force and say it’s for targeting woke weirdos…we’ll get a billion dollars through congress by tomorrow

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Intelligence that doesn’t come from jeebus?! They’ll burn that ark before it leaves the ground

          Search for god or his patio or whatever…now you’ve got Midwest money

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            “Search for extraterrestrial divine intelligence” or “a strategy to get closer to God through space colonization”, say, a Stanford torus in some L point (that’s so expensive that it ain’t gonna happen, but they’ll also be very excited, I think).

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        We could just say the “anti-woke” part and not even bother with the space force part and that would probably work.

        The woke boogieman is the biggest thing to scare them in years.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The woke boogeyman scares us because it, itself, is a set of false threats that are distracting us from real threats.

          Like, we’re worried about war, a shifting global power structure, the degradation of systems of detente that keep the worst in humanity from emerging, and the woke crowd wants us to treat the feelings of exclusion of trans people as the most important threat on the board.

          The woke movement is a boogeyman movement, and that’s why we treat it as dangerous. The woke movement is a push to get new boogeymen added to our threat list and moved to top priority over things we know will actually kill us.

          And thing that really, really scares us, is that the system that has proven to be the salve for the ills of massive unleashed violence, the system we call free market economics, is being targeted by the woke crowd because they refuse to read the history of the things they’re proposing. They’re all like “we don’t want people to suffer so let’s abolish private property”. That’s like saying “we don’t want people to drown, and people tend to drown when they’re near boats, so let’s destroy this boat we’re all in, to prevent drowning!”

          It’s terrifying to us because there are serious things to be afraid of, and the woke movement is asking us to ignore or even embrace those things.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            There is no “woke movement.” That’s exactly why you’re scared of a boogieman. They don’t exist either.