cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24607393

credit for this post to :
@denimaww@lemmy.world

The US is actually going to implement a nationwide abortion ban and the measures for how it’s going to be handled are already in the works. This bill, which I link to here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/7/text , seems ok at first glance and only seems to want to implement nationwide healthcare centers for women. But when you actually look at what these Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers are and mean to offer, it becomes really clear what’s going on.

On the first page of the PDF or booklet that appear when you search for the healthcare centers it is clear that they are supported by pro-life organisations and hold extreme pro-life values. And when you read the (very short) booklet it states their values and services that are to be provided. Among them is a requirement for “Abortion Pill Reversal” and encouragement for “Sterilization Reversal”. The last page clearly states their values, where among them it states that:

“Abortion is not women’s healthcare, because of the damage it causes to women’s physical and emotional health and the destruction of unborn life, many of whom are females. Abortion is usually something women turn to when they feel they do not have another choice. This is a tragedy and the opposite of choice and empowerment.”

And it goes on to list similiar values. The bill to implement these healthcare centers states that:

"That the House of Representatives—

(1) expresses its support for women nationwide to have access to comprehensive, convenient, compassionate, life-affirming, high-quality health care; and

(2) recognizes the high standards established by Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers consortium as standards worth implementing nationwide."

This means that the values that these Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers have are to be set as standards nationwide.

A link to the PDF/booklet about the Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers (PWHC): https://nacn-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/PWHC-Booklet.pdf

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    People are being gaslit.

    The rich just want more people as soldiers or workforce. Having a larger population is not a good thing for the poor people. Smaller workforce means higher wages as per the free market (supply - demand).

    And the worst part is, instead of seeing this, people jump to conclude “no, we just need to distribute the resources differently”, as if that’s gonna happen. It’s free labor market all the way, even if that means people living in poverty.

      • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        It will actually.

        In its current form the dems are a center-right republican-lite party. They serve the same oligarchs the Rs do.

        You see that in the policies they push and support. Or rather, the lack of policies. They don’t do anything constructive that would actually help people unless it’s a PR stunt when they need a little boost. And even then they lash it down with narrow scope and means testing.

        They are supposed to be the opposition. As in oppose. But they don’t. They refuse to. And they actively work to keep people who want to work for the good of the people out of positions of influence. If the dems wanted to, they would never lose an election again. But they don’t want to.

        Do you know why we have term limits? It’s because the populist policy and social programs instituted by FDR made him so popular he was elected to 3 terms as president. Minimum wage, labor laws, social security, etc.

  • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I drove to a friend to Kansas last year for an abortion. I still don’t know if it was mine. Either way if those services weren’t available then she would have suffered tremendously by having that baby. As badly as I wanted that baby to be mine it didn’t matter in the end because it’s her body not mine. It’s a simple as that and fuck anyone that wants to take those rights away

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Admittedly didn’t read the whole thing but this looks like they want to pay for pro-life centers everywhere. I don’t see anything about restricting care, except for scamming people into walking into a pro-life center pretending to be a medical center.

    Even today’s partisan court has to balk at government spending money on something that appears to be religion based, right? Right?

  • dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    House resolutions aren’t binding law. They may want to ban abortion, they may try in the next 4 years, but this is not what that is.

  • CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Currently this abortion info/help community seems defunct, but it might be worth trying to revive in some manner. I don’t have time right this moment, but it’s something I’ll look into helping with in the near future (like next week):

    https://lemmy.ml/c/auntienetwork

    (I’m not sure how linking on Lemmy works yet, so hopefully that comes through ok.)

    • A_A@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Please do create an appropriate Community for this … but preferably, not into that (—(.)ml) instance, since they have bad ways of deleting any communities that doesn’t fit some of their biased ideologies.

      • CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m on .world myself, do you think that would be ok, or is another better? I just remembered being part of it on Reddit, and figured I’d see if it made it over here.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d say you haven’t been paying attention but I just read another comment you made on another post in which you admire the power of the Nazi salute via its roman origins.

      So, I’m going to assume you’re just polluting the well.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well…now guys, we must not have sex with women. We should have clubs where we help each other thru the power of masturbation.

    We’re doing this for you women! And we’re chopping our balls off…America’s got talent never heard notes as high as we’ll have in the next few years!

    • OmgItBurns@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I got snipped and it was the on of the best days of my life. Definitely something you need to go into understanding how permanent it is, but if you definitely don’t want kids I cannot recommend it enough.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Soon, a sterile breeding age person will be labelled an unproductive useless eater and the department of efficiency will remove you from the payroll of life.

    • Epzillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The booklet has the “encouraged” procedures section where they state “sterilization reversal” which is just wild

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean, if a nation wants to fight a big war within 15 years, first they need to grow soldiers, right?

    if they ban abortion and then set up a pipeline from orphanages to army then you get a lot of jackboots in 15ish years

    • A_A@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, we know of course … But, O2P (original2 poster) went for “Politics” community, in which it was deleted. Then i hastily reposted here, before it would be lost. Finally, later on someone reposted in “furiouslyinfuriating@sh.itjust.works” but it doesn’t have as much traction !