Summary

At the first meeting of the DOGE Caucus, a new congressional group focused on government efficiency, Republican Rep. Greg Lopez stated that cuts to Social Security and Medicare are likely “on the table” as part of debt reduction efforts.

The caucus, led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, aims to slash government spending, raising concerns among advocacy groups about potential attacks on anti-poverty programs.

Critics, including Social Security Works, warn the caucus may push for privatization and benefit reductions.

This comes despite Trump’s prior commitment to protect these programs.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    doesn’t need to be, of course. they just want to cut social security because ‘the poors’ rely on it more.

    • einlander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      This could end badly for them. Old people without a means to continue surviving either have to continue working till they die, or die fighting the government.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        There’s certain people who continue to receive social security from childhood if they have a qualifying disability and make under a certain amount of money. I think to qualify for social security your primary caregiver has to be on social security, like if you live with a grandparent or you have an older parent.

        • einlander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I’m not even touching on those on SSDI. Just the common retired 67 year old. Just imagine a retired Walmart worker with no SSI income. Way too many of them with nothing else to do other than die; be homeless, suffer and die; or die taking in the government.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      The wealthy, who have had help all their life but imagine they did it all on their own, see needing help when you’re poor as a disgusting moral failing. Many of them will also call themselves Christians.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Wow! Who woulda guessed they would immediately reneg on a campaign “promise” and immediately attack the side of the population that most reliably votes for them?

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    The House R’s have a very tiny majority and their constituents will not be happy about this idea and will let them know it. So I feel like they won’t be able to get the votes to do it. I also think they’re going to prioritze things like more tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations first, as well as the border stuff, before they would get to that. Ya never know, but that’s what I’m hoping for.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      The House R’s have a very tiny majority

      You’re assuming there aren’t 20 Dems who will join them.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Don’t worry, the cuts will drain social security just in time for when you go to collect. Current recipients will go un affected. I have no insider knowledge, I just understand that corporate America hates my generation.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s funny at this point. Either the rich pay their share or we Mangione them. Tick tock musky. Tik fuckin tok.

    • 50MYT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m legit surprised some big stock brokerage or finance firm hasn’t loaded up to the tits on Tesla short positions and then sent in a couple of Luigi’s.

        • UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Yes if you consider tesla a company. No if you consider it as a way to buy influence via President Musk. (am slightly being sarcastic)

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Nah, he’s basically projecting that he’s in a position to remove any agency blocking anything he wants to do with his company. We’ll see if Congress actually lets him do it

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Tesla valuation at this point isn’t vaguely related to how good or bad their actual business is, at this point it’s people buying into “co president Elon”.

        • ProIsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I didn’t vote for this clown but the country did. Give em what they want. Make it fast

      • CitricBase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        OK, but we have to make it absolutely crystal clear who is doing this, who it’s hurting, and who is benefiting. That’s why reporting like this is important.

        Trump just won an election by blaming democrats for Trump’s own terrible economy.

        • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          People have no idea how the government works and they’re not taught that for a reason. Most people also have very short memories and do not understand that most legislation takes years to take effect. They only remember what they are currently being told and the more times it is repeated the more effective the propaganda.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yet if there is any discussion on increasing taxes on these fucks all of a sudden it’s government overreach on the “job creators”

    • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I hate to tell you but it won’t. My in-laws fall into that category and I constantly watch them twist themselves into knots trying to justify this stuff. They would also rather do without insurance than watch someone “undeserving” get it for “free”.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      They will blame immigrants, single mothers, non-whites and LGBTQ+ people, and ignore the facts.

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      All they have to do is tell them the reason it has to be done is LIBRULS and boom. All anger directed at Nancy Pelosi, all is forgotten.

      • Breve@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yup, all Trump has to do is say how the cuts would have been way worse under Kamala and the brainwashed masses eat it up without a single critical thought.

  • CitricBase@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Friendly reminder that Social Security is a separate government program that funds itself.

    What Musk is talking about is stealing from Social Security in order to cut taxes elsewhere (namely cutting taxes for people like Musk).

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Right now, it is looking like we have missed our chance to do much about it. The only other options on the table are pretty grim.

      • 4grams@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        We had our chance a little over a month ago. Now our only hope is their own incompetence.

      • CitricBase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I think a good start would be to stop allowing Republicans to raid Social Security for quick cash, like they’ve been constantly doing since the Reagan administration.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s not completely true. Long ago they put it into the general fund. There is always a shortfall in the general fund. Before they put it in there it was solvent, and if they wouldn’t have it would be completely solvent today.

        It was already stolen. They want the rest.

      • CitricBase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yes, it’s a payroll tax. Your paycheck may show how much you are paying into Social Security. This is money meant to help you and others after retirement. Musk wants to take that money and instead use it to fill unrelated gaps in the federal budget, gaps caused by Trump’s tax cuts for the very wealthy.

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            This is one of the rare cases where I want to laugh at the silly US, but can’t because our “scial security” (we call it “retirement savings”) is being missapropriated for general funds as well :(

            I just this year set up regular investment (part of my paycheck) into various funds to save for retirement privately.

            • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              I just this year set up regular investment (part of my paycheck) into various funds to save for retirement privately.

              Social Security got the structure it has after the Great Depression wiped… well, you know. Everyone. Out.

              I’m sure your private equity will be run much more responsibly throughout your life though, no need for some big ol’ stupid government to guarantee your retirement or anything. Carry on!

              • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                no need for some big ol’ stupid government to guarantee your retirement or anything.

                I still have the government guaranteed pension as well, not as if I could opt out even if I wanted to, which I don’t.

                The concept of the day: Diversification!

        • pound_heap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Social Security fund invested in government bonds, so the interest from that goes into the fund.

          To be fair the budget deficit was there before Trump. His campaign promises are going to increase it, but they can offset that partially with spending cuts. Also, the government has been using money from the Social Security fund routinely, again nothing new under Trump. They just count it as an internal debt. According to Wikipedia, by 2022 it’s been already about 20% of the fund “borrowed” by the government.

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        It doesn’t fund itself, but it’s a completely separate fund [bucket of money] than the rest of the government budget, with a specific tax that goes directly to it and nothing else.