They do this all the time. Maybe Biden should call their bluff, execute his powers as Commander in Chief, and order the National Guard in Texas to turn on State Police.

  • 31337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wonder what the strategy of this rhetoric and defiance is. I don’t think it’s just about immigration. I imagine they are trying to get favorable precedents set by the right-wing courts. I could also see, in the not too distant future, blue states defying a Republican-controlled federal government on things like a national abortion ban and anti-lgbt laws, so ideas and precedents normalized here could be applicable there.

  • vamputer@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    As a Texan who wants nothing to do with these absolute fucking morons, but whose life is directly impacted by their asinine whims: please don’t encourage them. I can’t afford to leave yet.

    • fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m in the same situation. People seem to forget that just under half of the 30 million people here aren’t conservative and don’t want anything to with this

      • vamputer@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Always nice to know people are looking out for us, right?

        Essentially telling a madman with hostages “yeah, do it, pussy. Bet you won’t,” just to see him reap the consequences, but conveniently forgetting state-wide consequences don’t only affect the people you want them to affect.

        Here’s hoping it just turns out like the last time these jerkoffs talked about secession. Maybe, if we’re lucky, we can finally get rid of Abbott. If we’re really lucky, maybe his replacement won’t be as psychotic, either!

  • scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    As someone who actually lives here, I would be very hard pressed to find someone who actually thinks secession is a good idea. It has been years since I’ve met someone who didn’t consider it anything more than a joke or bit of (false) trivia.

    Be aware that Lemmy is a pretty radically legt place. It isn’t where to go if you want nuanced takes on stupid conservative talking points.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why would anyone want nuanced takes on stupid conservative talking points? They’re not worth listening to because they’re not grounded in reality or knowledge of how the world works.

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can’t have a functional democracy if you don’t listen to the other side. That’s literally the problem we have right now, a bunch of boomers who scream socialism when you try to feed their starving children or get people access to medical care.

        • nxdefiant@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t think anyone would disagree with your point, but the other side is literally daring the U.S. military to kill them right now and emitting lout screeching noises. I can’t blame anyone for avoiding engagement.

          • scoobford@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            A vocal minority of cockwaffles are daring the federal government to assert its authority.

            I’m sure the proportion of conservatives who support this is disappointingly high, but it is not all, or even most (around here). Even if they do support this political fuckery, the transition to a shooting war is not a small leap.

        • radiosimian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think most rational people would like an opposition party who brings good ideas with solid justification to the table. A group of professional politicians who argue in good faith, working for the betterment of their electorate. People who can at least be respected by the international community, willing to tackle the real problems facing the world as a whole.

          If we’re talking about dictatorship perhaps it’s worth scrutinising the people arguing for total immunity for the president. It’s especially worth an in-depth look at the relationships they form with leaders of other nations and the principles they share.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      While this is true, your elected officials are acting as if it’s really on the table. You may not be able to find a Texan who says they want secession, but it’s not hard to find one who would vote for it.

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Rural Texas can be pretty crazy. Cities and the immediate surrounding areas are pretty normal and liberal.

      • I say this all the time, but that’s everywhere in the US. When I first moved to Pennsylvania, a friend told me that it was Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, with Alabama in between. Then, later, we moved to Minnesota, and it was the same thing: The Cities, a couple of outliers like Duluth and the college towns, but MAGA signs everywhere else.

        If the electoral college didn’t make elections so unfair, politics in the US would be more sane, and more liberal.

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, stopped at a gas station out in the middle of nowhere in west Texas, and the old woman at the cash register wouldn’t ring up me and my GF because my GF was black. In 2020. A friend almost got in a fight at a bar out in the middle of nowhere in Texas because he had a UT bumper sticker on his truck, and they didn’t like “liberals” there.

          But, the cities are pretty normal. Have seen police cars painted with rainbows for pride month. A church down the road from me flies a pride flag, etc.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          If the electoral college didn’t make elections so unfair, politics in the US would be more sane, and more liberal.

          If we ever end up actually having a civil war, it’ll be over this.

          The majority will be tired of the minorities bs, and they’ll insist on a change.

          The minority will insist that in never changes, because they would lose their power if it did, and are unwilling to lose the culture war.

          And unstoppable force and an immovable object type scenario.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Cities and the immediate surrounding areas are pretty normal and liberal.

        I’m not so sure about that.

        Comparing Austin to Houston (for example) you’ll see two quite different mindsets / philosophies going on. And Dallas/Fort Worth seems even different from the two other cities.

  • zak@lemmy.l0l.city
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Texas is a big place but I don’t know if it has the capabilities support itself as a sovereign country and have a full scale war against 49 other states. That being said secession is a bumper sticker cause for most who support it not to diminish the threat but I think they are obviously overplaying their hand.

    • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I suspect it wouldn’t be 49 other states- I’d bet that there’s several other equally stupid states that would happily join them. Definitely Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and maybe Florida would join in. But I bet if Biden tried to call their bluff and pull all govt funding and military bases from those states they would freak out and change their tunes fast.

  • twistypencil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t get why Biden doesn’t do this. The fear is abott will say government over reach and that will be a talking point for the election? How about strong father figure, who enforced the law to keep us united?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can’t let what Republicans say dictate what you do

      No matter what Biden does, they’re going to do what they’re going to do.

      Even if he doesn’t do the right thing now, they’ll just lie some more and do it anyways.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I guess the flip side of that though is it’s really past when everyone should keep trying to reason and compromise with these screaming toddlers. How many times now have we seen this exact thing play out where Republicans act completely unhinged and Democrats treat them with kid gloves and keep offering them compromises and trying to appease them. Fuck em. Ignore them until they cross the line, then come down on them like a ton of bricks. No more playing nice, no more treating them like reasonable adults. Wait until Abbott puts his name on something legally incriminating then send the FBI in to haul him to a jail in DC and try him for sedition. Bonus points if they can swing the death penalty.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I mean, have you ever tried to sink to a toddlers level and get in a screaming match with them?

          But sure, ideally we’d start running FDR style Dems again, get some of the 1/3 of the country who doesn’t vote regularly, and conservatives can keep screaming into the void while Dems sweep every election that matters.

          FDR literally only lost two states in 36, because he was legitimately trying to help the average American.

          But the DNC is very open about not wanting that, and after NH I really think they’d go as far as ignoring results in a competitive primary in 2028.

          So we’re kind of stuck with trying to win over conservatives, that’s the only direction the DNC recognizes as valid.

          I’ve given up on winning the game, I’m just trying to lose as little as possible at this point. Definitely doesn’t mean I have to like it either.

          But the choice is try what we can or check out and watch it all burn down, I’m not ready for that yet.

          Edit:

          My bad, I didn’t realize what you replied to.

          I’m saying don’t pay attention to what Republicans are threatening to do.

          Regardless of what Biden does, they’ll find an excuse to do it anyways. Because when Republicans try to explain why they’re doing anything, they’re almost always lying and just saying what they think the best answer is in the moment.

          So Biden should have activated them immediately on title 10.

          The longer he waits, the bigger chance a significant amount don’t listen. And at that point it’s a legit civil war.

      • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        No matter what Biden does, they’re going to do what they’re going to do.

        Ah, another Innuendo Studios fan, I see. Yes, just like he said in “Alt-Right Playbook Ep. 3, ‘You Go High, We Go Low’”,

        Republicans are going to cry “So much for the tolerant left!” no matter what form our opposition takes, so the obvious solution is to just ignore them. But clearly it’s more complicated than that, or we wouldn’t be having this issue.

        This business with the border is another example of them going low, and Biden and Democrats trying to keep the moral high ground.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Fuck that.

          The high ground is fighting fascism.

          Lincoln tried apeasment leading up to Civil War 1 and all that did was give the South time to build strength.

          We just saw how bad of an idea it is to crush an insurrection slowly. And there are shit ton of examples of how well appeasing extremists works worldwide.

          As soon as Abbots letter came out, Biden should have activated them under title 10, had them remove any remaining razor wire and the rest of the bullshit. If Abbott tried to move cops or a “militia”, then everyone involved should be arrested for sedation.

          This isn’t normal republican bullshit from a decade ago.

          This shit is as serious as conservative extremists make it. Giving in a little just emboldens them, and ignoring them does the same thing.

          I say this as a veteran of the US military:

          There’s a shit ton of US active military who would be willing to overthrow the government for some conservative bullshit.

          We can’t underestimate them. Even if they’re idiots, they’re dangerous idiots.

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I am not a conservative, I’m not a liberal either I’m just some dude but seriously are we all just cool with swaths of illegal immigrants coming in all the time? Like, literally nothing to stop them just giving them a hand up over the water? It just doesn’t seem like a good long term strategy, does it? I mean we can’t just walk into Canada if we feel like it either. Idk man Texas has a lot of issues but them saying they are enforcing their border because the feds just let undocumented people walk right in doesn’t seem that wild for real. If someone kept breaking into your house and the police did jack shit about it (which they really would) what would you do?

    • Fisherswamp@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think it is a fair comparison to say breaking into someone’s house is equivalent to claiming asylum.

      I also personally just don’t understand the issue with increased immigration - it gives us a larger labor pool, and counteracts our declining population.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s a proper way to claim asylum, and it’s not swimming across the Rio Grande at midnight.

        • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah it just requires money, time and connections. People fleeing countries have all of those things right?

              • yarr@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                If you think the rules are unfair, work to change them. Every person walking across the border is giving a middle finger to the qualified LEGAL immigrants waiting YEARS to be naturalized, many of them with financial challenges of their own.

                • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Agreed! That’s why I think we should elect MORE REPUBLICANS who are LITERALLY blocking ALL Immigration Reform because they know it’ll hurt Biden!

                • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Right, better that they die in their own country rather than seek asylum elsewhere and “give the middle finger” to those with more money, connections and time than they have.

                  Dying is bad but being disrespectful of unfair rules? Well nothing is worse than that.

        • Fisherswamp@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Given the current policies of the Biden administration, my understanding is that most immigrants are actually going through the legal process of claiming asylum.

          Channel 5 did a little mini documentary about it that I personally enjoyed: https://youtu.be/2dQ4-VNaG3s

          • yarr@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I fail to see how that legal process involves almost drowning in a river or becoming entangled in razor wire. We are talking about separate groups of people: some requesting asylum the LEGAL way and others taking a chance and YOLOing across the border.

              • yarr@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                So then why are people swimming across rivers and getting ensnared in razor wire, vs legally crossing at designated entry points? If they intend to surrender to border patrol, why not enter the US where the border patrol is present instead of sneaking across? In Tijuana, one can stand in line, get cleared by customs and enter the country. None of that has anything to do with razor wire.

                • Fisherswamp@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Because the entry points are closed.

                  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1158

                  Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.

                  They are actually following the legal process

    • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I know people love a simple answer that makes sense on the surface, but you’ve oversimplified this issue to the point of just being categorically wrong.

      A better analogy would be “someone came banging on my door saying that someone was going to kill them and I felt obligated to let them in. Now too many people are doing it and I wanted to live alone so I’m making them pick fruit for $2/hr and now my income depends on these people but I don’t want them here, what do I do?”

      Obviously stupid as well but it touches on some of the nuances that the “breaking into my house” analogy doesn’t.

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      “I am not a conservative”, “swaths of illegal immigrants”

      Are you sure you know what political leanings are? That is a false conservative talking point you are repeating. It’s not illegal to cross a border.

      • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I am positive I know my political leanings. It is true, there are a vast amount of immigrants crossing illegally across our border. If you cross illegally, it is by definition illegal. Which I do understand some laws are unjust but you shouldn’t blame the state when the feds won’t do anything to help them enforce what they say is illegal.

        • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t think you understand, there is no illegal way to cross the border. If someone tells you that there is people crossing the border illegally, they are doing a lie or have bought into false conservative talking points, you shouldn’t believe that. Now, there are undocumented immigrants, and that is something we could talk about. But illegal immigrants is not a thing, it’s like wizards in the Harry Potter universe. Fun to think about, but not real.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s a conservative position to limit immigration. Do you feel you support more progressive policies than conservative overall? What verifiable harm has come from increased immigration? People deserve a safe place to live, whether they were born in Mexico or Texas, we have more than enough resources in the US to help people that immigrate here. I don’t see how your metaphor is accurate. The US isn’t a house or private property.

  • silverbax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I guess Texas doesn’t understand they don’t have an army, but the US government already has a massive base right in the center of Texas.

    They can secede and then ask the US and Mexico for aid when they collapse, but there won’t be a civil war. Idiots.

    • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They actually do have an army. Most states have a state guard or reserves/militia.

      Edit: I did research and the state guards are branches of the national guard placed under the control of the state. Meaning that they are in the U.S. army, as the other user states.

      • silverbax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Those are US Army soldiers, paid by the US government. Control of the state reserves is only delegated to the Governor, because that makes sense. The individual governors can freely send them to areas which are in need. But the President can take back control at any time. If the governor of Texas decided to take the reserves under his direction and attack the US, they’d be placed right back under US control.

        They are not a “Texas” army. They are part of the US Army delegated to Texas.

        • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I have researched it and I was mistaken. What you are saying is correct.

          Really makes this whole thing extra strange, given that many states have sent their reserves to Texas. Political theater.