US President Joe Biden has said he is not confident there will be a peaceful transition of power if Donald Trump loses the presidential election in November.

"[Trump] means what he says, we don’t take him seriously. He means it, all this stuff about ‘if we lose it will be a bloodbath’.”

Mr Trump’s comment that it would “be a bloodbath for the country” if he loses the election, made as he was talking about the auto industry in March, triggered a wave of criticism.

The Trump campaign, however, said the comment was specifically about the auto industry and had been deliberately taken out of context. It sent a fundraising email which said Trump’s political opponents and others had been “viciously” misquoting him.

  • jprice@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s better in fact because there won’t be much of a transition. All you’re doing is giving the vice president your presidency dumbass. These old people, bro.

    If the domestic terrorists attack again just put them in the ground this time. Easy peasy.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see a lot of handwringing about this, like "Oh, even if Harris wins they’ll just attempt a coup again!"and it’s like OK, and? Your solution to them stealing an election is to let them win it legitimately instead?

      Yeah, voting isn’t a magic pill that solves everything. You still gotta wake up the next day and do the work.

      • havocpants@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        "Oh, even if Harris wins they’ll just attempt a coup again!"and it’s like OK, and? Your solution to them stealing an election is to let them win it legitimately instead?

        My solution would have been to lock them up for trying to steal the last one.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Might want the national guard on standby this time then. Dont wait for the legislators to waffle it

  • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A part if me wants to see the chaos that ensues after he’s defeated. I just hope nobody dies

  • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Translation: There will be enough military force there to snuff out any bullshit Dementia Don the weird racist rapist with 34 felonies brings.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Taken out of context” MFers when they actually read the primary sources of the Confederacy (⁠ノ⁠ಠ⁠益⁠ಠ⁠)⁠ノ⁠彡⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

  • TwinkleToes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well - why would he be? Trump didn’t accept it last time, and this is well and truly the end of the road for him if he doesn’t win. He’s 77 as it is, but zero point zero zero zero zero percent chance he gets this close again.

    And the cost of not winning is monumental. It’s victory or destruction for the vulgar talking yam. If he’s no longer of any use to Russia, imagine what information might come out about him, especially if they themselves descend into instability.

    Trump never accepts any defeat, ever. It’s always a disgrace, the worst, most nasty this and that that’s so unfair to him. Of course he’s not going to accept a defeat. What the adults do about it is the important variable.

    Given his legal trouble, he very truly could either be president or imprisoned. he probably has less money than he wants us to believe, fleeing to Russia or Venezuela etc isn’t really an option. His money will just be seized by the state and he will be disposed of as an impotent, toothless old hippo, only capable of making noise, with no more use to offer anyone.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s pretty obvious to everyone that it’s all or bust for trump. He’s desperate. Nothing to lose.

      They’re already strategising how to steal the election. They’re already on record saying they know exactly who to call when it’s time to validate the results from each state.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If he’s no longer of any use to Russia, imagine what information might come out about him,

      Jeffery Epstein didn’t kill himself.

  • P00ptart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But there’s been so many.

    “Dictator on day one”

    “You won’t have to vote anymore”

    Those are just the two off the top of my head as I’m heading back into work on my lunch break.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everything bad Trump ever says is either “a joke” or “out of context.”

      Weird how often he says things that everyone things he means and then he doesn’t mean them. I sure wouldn’t vote for a guy like that. He’s weird.

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It sent a fundraising email

    Trump’s response to everything, good, bad, indifferent, or wildly spun

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah.

        So he just lets congress get overrun again by a violent insurrection while taking the votes. Cuz that’s not his job… no sir-e.

        • SonOfMothman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not what I said… so… no.

          I can’t control what you do just like can’t control me. It’s on Donny to control himself and not insight another potential coup. No one can force the little cry baby to act like an adult. He has to do that himself.

          All Biden can do is try to mitigate the consequences of another 80 year olds tantrum

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            All Biden can do is try to mitigate the consequences of another 80 year olds tantrum

            ultimately, when those tantrums threaten the constitutionally recognized government, then it’s Biden’s job to, you know. Defend that government. as mandated by that constitution and as he swore to do.

            yes. it’s a very ugly place we’re coming to.

            that’s why he’s paid the middle-bucks.

            • SonOfMothman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can’t control anyone shy of putting them in prison which obviously isn’t happening. He’ll do what he can, but come on man, look what happened last time. They built gallows lol. It’s like trying to hold water, it’s uncontrollable nonsensical chaos from a whiny trust fund kid with a cult following.

              He’s gunna do what he does and Biden will do his best to mitigate the tantrum.

              In almost 1/4 of a century only 1 republican has won the popular vote and not even in both terms and only 1 guy refuses to admit it even after 8 years of being proven wrong.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. The danger here is GOP-controlled states refusing to certify a Trump loss, and the Federal government/Biden doesn’t have any power over that.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        refusing to certify is one thing, and isn’t necessarily violent.

        if the transition of power is not peaceful, that’s an entirely different manner, and yes Biden has the power to deal with that.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course he has the power to deal with it.

          But I think any sane person would hope that he isn’t put in the position to need to deal with it.

        • Bojimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Refusing to certify may send it to the house, where each state gets one vote. It would be a coup

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Corrupt election boards trying to throw the election to a corrupt House or corrupt SCOTUS is what causes violence.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, but there’s only so much he can do. Of course there are things he can do to prepare for violence, both directly and in coordination with state governors. That said, if people want to protest, they’re going to protest. The way things are, there’s a fine line between maintaining the peace and oppression. Republicans have, for years, been laying the groundwork for the oppression argument. It’s easy to say, “who cares” to that, but if enough people think they’re being oppressed by the government, things will get more violent.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I predict riots regardless of who wins.

    The only way to avoid it is if either side wins with a landslide, showing that the majority of the country is for the elected winner.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt it. trump appears to have lost a lot of persuasive power.

      If Harris wins, I’m pretty sure all the conservatives are going to slink back under rocks for the next few years.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would respectfully disagree with that assessment.

        Even if 2024 is a huge enough electoral wipe out that Trump and his MAGA base are embarrassed to follow through on the violence they’ve been promising for years. Yes, Republicans might slink away and hide.

        But they will rebrand and be back within a few months. We’ve seen this before at the start of the Obama Presidency’, when the fall out from the G.W. Presidency showed that Republicans had shit the bed sooo hard, even hard core Republicans that I knew denied they ever supported W. (Even though a few had fucking pictures of the asshat on their office walls for years.)

        But the useful idiots that make up the core of the Republican base were back in a few months as “Tea Party” Republicans. Fully funded and promoted Koch and other billionaires. All those hard core W. supporters suddenly got angry and jumped on that band wagon.

        Make no mistake they will be back, even in the best case scenario. (Which I very much doubt will happen.)

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Harris wins, a lot of places where Trump “should have” won are going to falsely claim fraud and refuse to certify their votes, leading to another Jan 6.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, he’s got the most powerful “security” apparatus in the world under his command. The charge of the yokels on mobility scooters shouldn’t be a problem to deal with.

  • Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the entire quote:

    “No, we’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country, that’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars, they’re building massive factories.”

    The context is talking about Chinese cars, but the bit where he says “it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country, that’ll be the least of it.” really looks to me like he’s saying there will be a bloodbath in general if he doesn’t get elected, the one in the car industry being small compared to it.

    I don’t know why I’m spending time and energy examining the idiotic ramblings of the orange gibbon.

    • ulkesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey, leave the orange gibbons alone – they’re considerably smarter than the orange wannabe Hitler.

    • Shawdow194@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The context is great! Its exactly like his other interjections - usually uncorrelated and exactly what’s really go in his mind

      His bigot blurts are about the only truth he speaks

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the problem isn’t it? He’s not mentally there enough to realize a presidential candidate can’t talk about a bloodbath without it being taken that way. I learned that you have to think about how your message is received in grade school. And that was just to avoid detention.

    • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I understand he is talking about cars… but that’s not how anyone has taken it…

      As a left centrist in a deep deep red state. I’ve got yet another firearm on order currently.

      My politics boil down to

      I want my state sponsored medically insured gay married neighbors and their adopted freely educated children to be able to protect their legally grown pot plants with fully automatic ak47s.

      Lol

      Hilariously those beliefs are sins in the face of my neighbor’s… Which blows my mind.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Conservativism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: there is a group that the law should protect but not bind, and a group that the law should bind but not protect.

        And the thing is, while there are some people who just go along with this for the benefit of their own grift, the vast majority of these people actually believe that an order like this is absolutely necessary, and if we don’t have it civilization itself will collapse. In their view there must be a strict hierarchy and everyone must ‘know their place’ in it, or we are all doomed.

        Because of this, they spend their time primarily in two pursuits:

        1. Trying to force everyone to live this way, because it is the One Right Way To Live
        2. Proving to themselves and others that they deserve to be in the In Group and at a certain level in that hierarchy, usually by trying to assign people to the Out Group and then put them in a lower position.

        You’re just someone they’re trying to stuff in the Out Group, is all.

        It’s also why they don’t like the idea of minorities in power; one, in their eyes minorities belong in the lower tiers of the Out Group and therefore their presence will destroy the fabric of society, and two, they think that if minorities are let into the In Group, then they will be forced into the Out Group.