• TwinTusks@bitforged.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      My childhood friend called her husband “hubby”, shes late 30s, but not white and not overweight. But I do feel a bit weird calling husband “hubby”, I won’t call my wife “wifey”

  • richieadler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    • People who consider drinking alcohol and getting drunk “fun” are dangerous to be around.

    • Visiting the US and expressing atheism is dangerous.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    People that say “ex cetera” instead of “et cetera” should be taken at their word.

      • Vanth@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ll level up the pedantry. In French, it’s spelled expresso but still pronounced with a “ss” sound because that’s how it works in French. So they aren’t just probably mispronouncing the Italian word, they’re also possibly misreading the French word.

        • Evkob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re incorrect, “expresso” in French is pronounced /ɛk.spʁɛ.so/.

          I’m a snobby barista, so I stick to the more Italian-like prononciation even when speaking French, but the French word expresso is pronounced as its written.

          • Vanth@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m inclined to listen to the three unrelated French people I know on the pronunciation. Idk, maybe a regional thing 🤷

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve noticed this in a lot of words watching youtube lately. Excape instead of escape, expecially, etc.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ha! How much time have you got?

    Shallow and pedantic is my speciality.

    But for the sake of brevity I’ll simply say that hearing (or reading) less in cases where fewer would be more appropriate is like driving an ice pick into my brain.

    Yes…both are technically correct, but I have to fight the urge to be that guy whenever I hear it.

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Less could historically be used in any case and still can today. The distinction was first suggested by a guy a couple hundred years ago.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      My stupid mental trick for keeping these straight: fewer potatoes means less mashed potatoes.

    • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re not interchangeable. ‘Fewer’ is for countable nouns and ‘less’ is for aggregate nouns, just like ‘how many’ and ‘how much’.

      E.g:

      Aggregate:

      “How much sand? Less sand.”

      Countable:

      “How many grains of sand? Fewer grains of sand.”

      • boatswain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Along with that, I’ll add in “number” vs “amount”:

        • A shocking number of people get this wrong (countable)
        • The amount of confusion about it is distressing (aggregate)
      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh believe me, I know. I agree.

        but the argument nowadays is that common usage dictates that both are now “acceptable”, similar to how apparently “literally” now effectively means “figuratively” because everyone uses it.

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Socks and slides is only acceptable footwear for taking the bin to the kerb or checking the mailbox. If you’re wearing them in public I immediately assume you are a classless dumbass and your opinion on anything is irrelevant.

  • herrvogel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Germany did not invent döner kebap and it’s insane that they claim that. Anyone who insists on it displays a tragic lack of understanding about what a kebab even is and should be ashamed of themselves.

    What they did invent is their own way of preparing and serving döner kebab, an existing dish that is itself a variation of other existing dishes that came before it. In the kebab world, that’s not only allowed but also basically encouraged. Everyone is welcome to modify dishes to their heart’s desire. There are countless kebab dishes in Turkish cuisine that are nothing more than slight variations on existing dishes. What you should do after creating your own variant, however, is to also give it your own name to mark the difference. That’s what the Germans have not done. They’re continuing to use the name of a dish they did not invent. That’s a bit of a dick move. Seriously, look up Antep kebab and Urfa kebab. They’re essentially the exact same thing except one is hot and the other is not. Yet they have different names, because that’s how it’s done.

    The German döner kebab is a distinctly different thing than the “real” döner kebab. According to the long standing kebab traditions, it must be given its own name. Otherwise no, döner kebab was most certainly not invented in Germany. Name it something else and make a proper claim. It would even help enrich your exceptionally poor and boring cuisine a little bit.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      By Germans you mean ethnic Turks who made it and marketed it as such to ethnic germans?

      I mean I get your point but the naming here is part of marketing IMHO German Turks made it for local market while keep “exotic” name

      Rebranding at this stage is futile lol this thing is more popular prolly than the Turkish original lol

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is true that it was a Turk that marketed it as such, but it’s mostly the Germans that are so insistent on claiming it’s a German invention. The only Turks I’ve seen that weren’t largely indifferent were those who made and sold the stuff, but even the non-döner-worker Germans can be weirdly militant about it especially after a few drinks.

        In any case, why it was named that is irrelevant to the point. Which is that we’re being pedantic in this thread and, strictly speaking, the name is wrong. It is in gross violation of the unwritten döner naming conventions. But obviously I’m not holding my breath for any official rebranding.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I always hated how most people don’t pronounce the first R in “February”. It just sounded kinda weird to me.

    • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I propose we replace the word entirely to something easier to spell and pronounce, such as “Feby”.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you’re going to fix the calendar, we should move SEPTember to position 7, OCTober to 8, NOvember to 9, and DECember to 10 where they belong (or just rename them all to be number-based instead of an arbitrary mish-mash of numbers, people (Julius, Augustus, etc.), and so on).

    • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Now you have me paying attention to how I pronounce it. And now either way feels weird. Thanks a lot.

  • EABOD25@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If I’m driving, and you throw a negative hand gesture at me, I’m going to follow you to see if you’re willing to throw that hand gesture directly in my face.

    That might be less shallow and shows that I might have some anger management issues. Certainly pedantic though

    • fireweed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This response is literally road rage. (Given the discussion about literally vs figuratively elsewhere in the thread, I genuinely mean literally).

      Road rage is dangerous for you, the other driver, and other bystanders on the road. Please reassess how you respond to perceived aggressions and slights while driving. The only time you should escalate is if another road user is actively putting others in harm’s way (e.g. DUI) and even then the best course of action is probably calling your local authorities for them to handle the situation. If the situation is not severe enough to warrant a 911 call, your focus should be on de-escalation (before it turns into a situation that is).

      • EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Pretty sure I covered your whole comment with “I might have anger management issues”

        And to me, no. It’s not just road rage. It’s the potential of belittling people because of what is most likely misunderstanding or miscommunication. Everyone is guilty of those daily, but if you treat people as a villian or a lesser because of what could be a misunderstanding, and physically express gestures, then how are with expressing those gestures in person. To me, most people treat others like that because they think they’re either infallible in the situation, infallible period, or they believe there are no repercussions to their actions. When I lose my temper, I go out of my way to prove them all wrong

        • fireweed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s a huge difference between losing your temper when controlling a digital go-kart versus a real-life one-ton vehicle.

          It’s a good first step that you recognize this is a problem, but it needs to be followed up with actions you can take when it occurs. In the case of driving, if your impulse is to follow the driver who pissed you off, you need to get off the road at the very first safe opportunity (a side street, a freeway exit, a parking lot, whatever) to give yourself a chance to cool down and both mentally and physically distance yourself from the situation. It doesn’t matter how much of a jerk the other party is (again, unless they are actively putting people in danger, in which case you should be pulling over to call emergency services); when you’re on the road the only thing you should be concerned with is your own behavior. There is zero justification for escalation; you are not teaching the other person a lesson, you are putting people’s lives at risk over a minor slight.

          I used to work in transportation and you wouldn’t believe the horror stories. Please don’t underestimate how quicky and easily road rage situations can turn ugly; it’s never worth it.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Just because you called it out and this is a thread about pedantry: road rage is an idiomatic phrase, which is a type of figurative language. So, you were using literally to emphasize figurative language rather than try to clarify you weren’t using the idiomatic meaning of the phrase but rather a literal.

        • EABOD25@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Weird thing is that I perceived that my statement was related to pedanticism. I’ll agree I’m not a pedantic in a traditional sense, but road rules and environment can potentially be pedantic because there are certain rules that need to be followed to ensure proper road etiquette. I.e. following distance, mental condition, speeding, lane discipline, and courtesy to other drivers

          And I’m not questioning your intelligence, but pedanticism is a difficult word today. It means “the qualities of a pedant”

          A pedant is a person obsessed with small details

          • candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I didn’t say your statement was pedantic. Just that you specifically called out your use of literally as not used in a figurative sense and that this thread in general is about pedantry. Those two things together made it seem not totally insufferable to point out that literal was actually being applied to figurative language.

            • EABOD25@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Fair enough. You make a good point, and again, you are a very intelligent person. At no point were my intentions to insult that

    • Quazatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Maybe you should read up on stoicism.

      Allowing someone else’s action control your actions is a massive waste of time, let alone a great way to attract trouble.

      • EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Probably. And the biggest thing that convinces me to stand down is that they’re random strangers and don’t deserve my psychotic wrath. And me and the other people can thank my wife. She is the only one that can say something to bring me back to reality, but I don’t know what will happen if she’s not around

      • EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe… maybe not. I have a lot of rage built up in me that I haven’t been able to release in a healthy manner. Generally I can push it down, but, just like everyone else, I have my triggers and will absolutely unleash my rage and chaos wins. Sorry for the corny wording. It’s all I could think of haha

        • kibiz0r@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          built up

          release

          push it down

          unleash

          This wording is troubling, and suggests that maybe you believe in the catharsis model of anger?

          That’s where you believe that anger is “stored” somewhere and “builds up” over time, and must be let out in some “healthy” way later. The problem is, there is no healthy way to express deferred anger.

          If you allow yourself some visceral reward for getting angry and fixating on that anger, what you’re doing is training your brain to look for excuses to become angry and stay angry, so that you can get that dopamine hit of “blowing off steam”. It feels like it works, cuz it feels good. But it creates a link between getting angry and feeling good.

          Pay attention to whether you have structures in place which are rewarding you for getting angry, and try to replace them with less rewarding, less stimulating responses.

          • EABOD25@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I appreciate your concern, but it’s not like that. I hate when I get that adrenaline spike because it immediately makes me feel like garbage. I get sudden hypoglycemia, and immediately need to eat something, and (since I just learned I have Polycythemia) my whole body gets gross and sweaty and red and overheated.

            It’s just not a good time for me. I have a justification in my head of why I can go off like that, but it’s mine

            • kibiz0r@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Right on, friend. Take care. And I’m sorry you’re getting kind of a rough response to being so vulnerable here.

              • EABOD25@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                It’s just fake internet points. If people have a negative opinion about me, then that’s their mental energy to waste, but thanks for the support

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Its always amazing to me that the middle finger means anything to anyone beyond playfulness. The only time it ever gets any kind of reaction from me is when its used jokingly/affably, which provokes only a smile and makes me fonder of the person cuz its like an inside joke

      • EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        For me, my reaction can be a problem. If I keep it up, I’m probably going to get shot. However (and I’ll call it intrusive thoughts) there are so many people that think they’re protected by their armor (cars), but people never expect when other people strip their armor and go “Do it again”. About 80% of my interactions like that have ended with them Either saying they didn’t do that or they apologize. Both reactions tell me a lot about their character, but it also tells me a lot about my character…

        The short and skinny of what has been proven to me, and what I can justify, people think they’re untouchable until the very last second where they know they aren’t untouchable. You treat everyone with courtesy and respect in ever aspect of your life, then there’s no problem. You think you’re more entitled than the next person, then you get what you deserve

        Other people call that a hero complex, but me personally… I call that a hero complex haha

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s mostly that particularly poor common grammar drives me nuts. Like, there’s no excuse to not know the difference between you’re and your. Once could be a mistake or a typo, but if it’s a pattern of behavior you’re just not trying. Get your shit together. :)

    • meleethecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I definitely judge people on grammar and spelling. If you can’t be bothered to learn your native language, then I can’t be bothered to decode your shitty writing.

        • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Mistakes like “you’re” vs “your” are generally not made by people learning English as a second language unless they’ve only learned by speaking (in which case, I’d expect all their spelling to be a mess given that English is a mess). Same with “could of” instead of “could’ve”.

  • candybrie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    People who think anyone uses literally to mean figuratively are annoying and too caught up in their crusade to realize their take is idiotic. No one uses it to mean figuratively. People use it to emphasize regardless of the figurative nature of language. It’s semantic drift that happens to most words that mean something similar to “in actuality” (e.g. really, actually). Even in other languages.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I find if more confusing than annoying, at times. If the emphasizing is getting on the way of being clear, you should maybe use some other way to emphasize it.

      “I’m literally broke” shouldn’t be a statement open to interpretation, in my person opinion. The internet and lack of familiarity with strangers just aggravates the problem.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah. Dictionaries reflect popular usage. And I think literally has probably been in use in that sense nearly as long as it’s been used to mean something really did happen that way.

  • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That anyone who always want to correct usage of the word ‘ironic’, much like those who use ‘whom’ as the subject of a sentence, are trying to signal intelligence but revealing stupidity, and can be dismissed pretty much entirely as people to take seriously.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Proper usage of ‘s.

    Guy joined my team a few years ago and uses ‘s for literally everything, and now most of the team does it too.

    It bothers me every time, and I’ve typed corrections into the message box so many times but never hit send.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      uses ‘s for literally everything

      literally everything

      literally

      I’ve got news for you.

      Okay, honestly, I do have a choice each day about which tickets I work in which order, and ‘literally’ isn’t the only reason a ticket will be the Very Last one I schedule. There’s also ‘emails’, ‘the ask’, ‘the spend’, and a list of other pathetic Used Car Salesman words.

      And I don’t want to stand in the way of people’s success; especially when they don’t know their nouns from their verbs and are just trying to get through the day before their crayons run out. But people who can use words property will get a bonus of being first.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Lmao, I actually debated whether to say “literally”.

        I typically hate that word too. But I wanted to convey that it’s a constant thing, not a fluke. He thinks it’s a “literary rule”. So using “literally” seemed… “literally” appropriate.

  • thomasloven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Difference in temperature cannot be expressed in °C. It’s not 5 °C warmer today than yesterday. It’s 5 K warmer. You can say “five degrees warmer”, but not “five degrees Celsius warmer” or “five Celsius warmer”. “Five Celsius degrees warmer” is also correct, but who’d do that?

    The reason is that the Celsius scale has a fixed offset. If your birthday is in a week, you wouldn’t say it’s “one seventh of January from today”.

    • myliltoehurts@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was not aware of this before and this is probably one of the most pedantic things I’ve heard for a while - great answer.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The same applies to Fahrenheit, differences between temperatures in Fahrenheit should be expressed using the Rankine scale.

    • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The reason is that the Celsius scale has a fixed offset.

      Can you explain more on this? I still don’t get it.

      As of now, although I am not a man of authority on this subject, I still think temperature difference can be expressed by using celcius simply because the celcius has the same equivalent difference as Kelvin. The difference of the two value of the same unit will still be the same unit.

      First, from here

      Since the standardization of the kelvin in the International System of Units, it has subsequently been redefined in terms of the equivalent fixing points on the Kelvin scale, so that a temperature increment of one degree Celsius is the same as an increment of one kelvin, though numerically the scales differ by an exact offset of 273.15.

      Secondly from here

      The degree Celsius (symbol: °C) can refer to a specific point on the Celsius temperature scale or to a difference or range between two temperatures.