• Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, Mass Effect, Witcher, and Cyberpunk 2077 are just a few games among many that these groups would love to target and take down for giving lgbtq options. Could forsee a future where games have to start self censoring themselves to try to avoid demonetization. Best case scenario is they only censor in certain countries.

      So those who think it is just attacking porn games and don’t care because they play normal games will be in for a rude awakening if these groups get their way.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        steam and itch capitulated here because indy games are small potatoes. the calculation changes if they start going after $70 AAA titles selling millions of copies.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They don’t need to. AAA developers will start backing down on their own because they don’t want to risk the confrontation.

  • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reports on Twitter that they are deleting previously purchased games from users’ libraries as well.

  • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, getting rid of anything that even acknowledges the existence of queer folk is absolutely on brand for Christofascists.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The problem with leaving it in the hands of corporations… Is that some are run by pieces of shit with very warped ideas

    What they allow might be worse than what they ban

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ahh, yes

    A collective against the objectification of women, which somehow has no Problem with the current system in america, pornography itself, and dosent advocate for anything except banning Video games.

    • mriswith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Deindexed/delisted, not removed.

      Try putting the names into the search field on the site, or browsing for them in the categories they are in.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Did that ever work anyway? For the last few years i only find porn games via duckduckgo and “You might also be interested in”.

        edit: right, respective tags list no porn games anymore.

        • mriswith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          edit: right, respective tags list no porn games anymore.

          Which could cause them to no longer be indexed by search engines depending on other settings. So you’d need to find direct links from other websites.

            • mriswith@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Exactly. They “crawl” category/tag lists, etc. and follow links. And if there are no links to those pages, they wont be indexed.

              (Depending on some settings. For all I know they’ve set up “hidden redirects” for popular crawlers to pages that show them)

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fuck that. They can collectively shout into this asshole. All we gotta do is start a counter movement. Which I guarantee will be easier to grow than Collective Prudes.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      All we gotta do is start a counter movement. Which I guarantee will be easier to grow than Collective Prudes.

      My guess — and I haven’t seen anything where payment processors have released any details of what Collective Shout did – is that Collective Shout didn’t just call Visa and say “we don’t like this”. They probably found some sort of law, maybe in Australia, that processing payments for these violates, and had their lawyer send a nastygram to payment processors about it. The payment processors sent their own warning letters to the merchants.

      Like, the reason payment processors are useful as leverage for countries is because countries can put pressure on them, because payment processors do business all over and are gonna be skittish about violating laws in a bunch of countries, can get cut off from doing business there. And any one retailer just isn’t big enough for them to be worried about cutting off compared to getting cut off from a country.

      If you want to put pressure on payment processors, I’d guess that you’re probably going to have to have some kind of law to threaten payment processor with on the grounds that processing payments to Steam and itch.io and other retailers and so forth when they are deindexing games results in some kind of legal violation. I’m not saying that that’s impossible, but it’s probably harder to do than it is for Collective Shout is to pull their shennanigans.

      I’d also note that it is not at all clear that the present situation is the final state of affairs. That is, what my guess is that Valve and itch.io and so forth did is that they got their nastygram from the payment processors, then went to talk to their own lawyers. It’s entirely possible that after those lawyers have a look at it, they’re going to say “you can’t sell Game X in Country Z”, and Valve will just restrict the regions where they sell those games. That is, I would not be surprised if the scope on this restriction narrows, and Valve and itch.io are just playing it safe until they’re confident as of their legal position.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Also, relevant:

        https://quoteinvestigator.com/2021/07/12/censor/

        The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

        — John Gilmore, founding member Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)

        In its original form, it meant that the Usenet software (which moves messages around in discussion newsgroups) was resistant to censorship because, if a node drops certain messages because it doesn’t like their subject, the messages find their way past that node anyway by some other route. This is also a reference to the packet-routing protocols that the Internet uses to direct packets around any broken wires or fiber connections or routers. (They don’t redirect around selective censorship, but they do recover if an entire node is shut down to censor it.)

        — also Gilmore

        Gilmore also stated that the denotation of the saying has broadened over time:

        The meaning of the phrase has grown through the years. Internet users have proven it time after time, by personally and publicly replicating information that is threatened with destruction or censorship. If you now consider the Net to be not only the wires and machines, but the people and their social structures who use the machines, it is more true than ever.

        I am generally bearish on the future of Internet censorship. The Internet helps facilitate some things that one might not like, extensive profiling. But it also is very good at distributing information, and I think that in general, the availability of information in the future will be greater than in the past. I do not think it likely that our future will, on the balance, be more-censorious than our past.

    • sundaymidnight@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I say that we must take a revenge… I am very angry for the freedom of expression and respect to individual rights. It is simply a nazi organization disguised in Christian clothes.

      • AstaKask@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Each sect of the insane Yahweh-cult has a way bigger body count than the Nazis ever accomplished.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You’re making it sound like this isn’t straight up Christianity.

        For this one Christianity is to blame, not Nazis.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          My brother in Christ, it’s all the same ideals.

          “When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”

          • Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Except Collective Shout is Australian (which is unsurprising, considering that AUS is also a hotbed of hate groups).

            • xthexder@l.sw0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Feel free to provide the Australian equivalent of the quote if there is one. The country can be substituted for any not-yet-Fascist-controlled country and still apply, in my opinion.
              Different countries might have different symbolism instead of a flag and cross, but the sentiment is that Fascism disguises itself and evolves to fit in wherever it goes.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What’s Jesus have to do with Christianity? Christianity has always been Paul’s religion, not Jesus’.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And he despised the rich. Turns out Christianity today is what it always has been, consolidation of (male) wealth and power. It never really had much to do with the teachings of Jesus

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lol what are you people ever going to do.

      You can’t just wait until you’re mad to do something. It takes years building networks and getting everyone on board.

      Totally doable if people had a bit of common sense but the reason why the right are kicking ass and doing this stuff is because people now are pretty brain washed and can’t figure out how most of the stuff that fight for are also the things they need to stop in order to prevent this stuff. But because they will never figure that out, you’ll never get anywhere.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tbh, I didnt know this group exists until this happened. So sometimes an event happens, you get mad, and you do something about it. Thats usually how most people come to action.

    • tarknassus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not the first time this has happened. That first time set the precedent that the payment processors have a vast amount of power over the transactions that can occur on the internet. There wasn’t a realistic way to push back on it and so they will continue to expand this for… whatever reason they are actually giving. IDK - I would have thought that legitimate adult content payments would be quite lucrative for these processors to handle, it’s not like they’re beholden to advertising like YouTube is and their insane content policies.

      I mean, I cannot find a valid reasoning for it apart from the vague term “high risk” which explains nothing. This is the best I’ve found so far:

      The adult industry is no stranger to regulation and stigma. But in recent years, payment processor censorship has emerged as a subtler, more insidious threat. Companies like Mastercard, Visa, and their underlying bank networks often issue sweeping mandates, particularly regarding “high-risk” content. These decisions typically happen behind closed doors, without public accountability or stakeholder input from the communities affected.

      (bold emphasis mine)

      To reduce perceived brand risk or avoid legal ambiguity, even when the content is legal.

      TBH they are making themselves look pretty shitty as a brand by moving sex work and other adult content back to the darker deeper recesses where it becomes less accessible and harder to regulate properly in terms of safety and legality.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Time to order all your dildos, KY, condoms, swings, and penis pumps for life before those things get banned. Sure they’ll come back one day, but do you have time to wait for that?