• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m holding out for a fully-autonomous flamethrower robotic monkey.

    • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Because. Also, flamethrower aren’t considered weapons by the government, so the only states that limits you from buying one is California and Ohio and Maryland banned them.

        • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Not a ban, a restriction. Like California, you need a permit. Sorry if I made that confusing.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ok new life goal. Be that guy at the DMV with a permit for a flamethrower arguing with the civil servant that “because it is cool” is a valid reason

            • tal@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              In most if not all states, if you have an AAA membership, you can do your DMV stuff at AAA offices and dodge the DMV entirely. The lines are way better.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                In my area, the DMV is actually quite pleasant. I’ve had to go like 2-3x ever? And each time was a 15 min adventure:

                • registered my car from out of state
                • bought a car from a local private seller - I brought them with me to finalize the transfer
                • bought a car from an out of state private seller (my brother), just brought the signed title

                Or emissions checks can be submitted at the check station for $8 or filed online for free, so there’s no reason for most people to go to the DMV. In fact, most other stuff can be done online too.

                It honestly takes longer for me to get there (like 15 min drive) than to actually get my business sorted. It’s one of the better run agencies in the state.

                That said, the DOL division sucks. We don’t even require in person renewals, but the two times I had to go sucked (when I first moved here, and for my wife to get her license transferred). It’s a much smaller office with far more people waiting.

                • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  I have a DMV that’s never busy around me too, at the cost of being further out of my way (even more so now that I’ve moved even farther from it). But it’s worth being able to walk in and go right to a counter (without an appointment even!) instead of waiting 8+ fucking hours starting at 5am like the one in my actual city.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        flamethrower aren’t considered weapons by the government

        Considered firearms.

        • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          No they’re not. The ATF does not consider flamethrower a firearm and there exists no country wide law about flamethrower, and by law, even a felon can own a fully working flamethrower.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Right. I’m saying that you wanted to use the term “firearm”, not “weapon”.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        California allows roofers to have flamethrowers. They use them for curing something in the roofing tiles(? I don’t know the proper term for those things. They’re basically cardboard covered in tar and gravel, possibly a thin layer of asphalt?).

        It was a bit unnerving the first few times I heard the roofers doing their thing.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          They’re called shingles, asphalt shingles being the most common in most parts of the US because they’re relatively inexpensive.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    If you’ve been wondering when you’ll be able to order the flame-throwing robot that Ohio-based Throwflame first announced last summer, that day has finally arrived.

    It features a one-hour battery, a 30-foot flame-throwing range, and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity for remote control through a smartphone.

    It also includes a LIDAR sensor for mapping and obstacle avoidance, laser sighting, and first-person view (FPV) navigation through an onboard camera.

    The company lists possible applications of the new robot as “wildfire control and prevention,” “agricultural management,” “ecological conservation,” “snow and ice removal,” and “entertainment and SFX.”

    Back in 2018, Elon Musk made the news for offering an official Boring Company flamethrower that reportedly sold 10,000 units in 48 hours.

    Even so, to state the obvious, flamethrowers can easily burn both things and people, starting fires and wreaking havoc if not used safely.


    The original article contains 286 words, the summary contains 139 words. Saved 51%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I hate this but it’s hilarious. It’s a microcosm of everything that’s making me depressed right now, and somehow that’s precisely why it’s amazing.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Have you considered a regular dog that doesn’t shoot flames? Our non-flamethrowing dog does a very good job taking care of the rabbits she can’t chase away.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Probably leaves a monolayer of dog shit, though. Now, a flamethrower robo-dog, there’s the dog of the future.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butane_torch

        Culinary

        Butane torches are frequently employed as kitchen gadgets to caramelize sugar in cooking, such as when making crème brûlée. They may be marketed as kitchen torches, cooking torches, or culinary torches. Use of the butane torch in the kitchen is not limited to caramelizing sugar; it can be used to melt or brown toppings on casseroles or soups, to melt cheese, and to roast or char vegetables such as peppers.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They are not actually that expensive. You just feel posh when you use one.

        My girlfriend came with one, it’s great for grilled cheese. But I’m not allowed to use it anymore because I set fire to a chocolate bar.

      • adam_y@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I say that, but I, in no way, want that to happen.

        But yeah, Boston Dynamic have long said that they don’t want their robots weaponised, but here we are seeing it happen.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Boston Dynamics has made multiple robots for DARPA. If they make a really great platform, I expect they’re probably gonna be weaponized at some point. Maybe not by them, but…

          I remember a buddy of mine who was working on an autonomous, self-mapping rover research project at his university on a DARPA project. He was just working on the navigation side, part of a larger project. He was telling me how he had a “huh” moment when they got the first control unit and it had a big red button on it labelled “weapon”.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Don’t even bother shooting them, just use the flamethrower for everything. There may be collateral damage but it’s worth it.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Also the reason that flamethrowers aren’t illegal in most states, since being able to project flame makes controlled burns a lot easier.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Employees trying to unionize.

      At least it seems like that sort of thing never ends up being a felony…

  • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have a piece of bologna, lighter, hairspray, duct tape, and a city full of strays.

    Strapping a can of hairspray to a stray and lighting it: Priceless

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m waiting for more competition to enter the market and for prices to be driven down further.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Owning is boring. You want to rent one through my new app. FRaaS. Flamethrower robot as a service. I am starting the first round of venturing funding at 1 billion. It also has block chain in it.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is an absolute W for flamethrowing robot dog enthusiasts everywhere.

  • dbilitated@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The whole article listing the various uses of flamethrowers, like environmental conservation, then mentioning concerns that flamethrowers can double as weapons is just… I don’t even know what to do with that.

    it even lists napalm as an intended use. gonna conserve the hell out of that commie rainforest, I guess?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The thing is we on paper didn’t use incindiaries in Vietnam as anti personnel weapons, it was to torch the rainforest and deoxygenate tunnels. Now in practice we all know that flamethrowers were used on homes and have seen the pictures of the children with Napalm burns. But yeah this line of argument is nothing new.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I just want one that delivers a beer and a hunk of summer sausage.

    But a flamethrower? I guess…sure?

    burns down house during summer sausage delivery