I’m sorry but it doesn’t make sense TO ME. Based on what I was taught, regardless of the month, I think what matters first is to know what day of the month you are in, if at the beginning, in the middle or at the end of said month. After you know that, you can find out the month to know where you are in the year.

What is the benefit of doing it the other way around?

EDIT: To avoid misunderstandings:

  • I am NOT making fun OF ANYONE.
  • I am NOT negatively judging ANYTHING.
  • I am totally open to being corrected and LEARN.
  • This post is out of pure and honest CURIOSITY.

So PLEASE, don’t take it the wrong way.

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Because the month tells me more about how far in the future something is. If I have an appointment on the 12th of July, there’s not much information in knowing it’s on the 12th. 12th of what? But it’s in July, so between 1 and 2 months in the future. If I need more info, then I’ll pay attention to the day. So in order of information given.

    Historical dates are similar, except I really just need (roughly) the year, and then a month if that’s relevant. Knowing the exact date of a historical event is just showing off. But if you know the month, you know what season it was, what the weather was probably like. Was it planting/growing/harvest time? You can guess at a lot of things with just the month.

    • NONE@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Perhaps because where I live there are no seasons in the same way as in the United States, knowing the month doesn’t matter to us unless we work in the fields, here there are only months of sun and months of rain.

      • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure, but if I tell you the month, you still know what part of the year it is. If it’s sunny, or if it’s rainy must mean something to you.

        • NONE@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Mmm not so much. I prefer to know on the first day so, for example, how close I am to payday, which is every two weeks. I don’t care that much about months other than December since I finished college.

      • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah that makes sense then. I live in Minnesota and the seasons definitely matter here. Every 3 months will be a completely different drastic changes to temperature, weather, etc. So for planning, the month definitely matters and I think it makes more sense for us to say it first.

        Not that it really matters that much haha.

  • slothrop@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m guessing, but it’s likely because the spoken form for a date is normally, 'May 31st, 2025" vs “The 31st of May, 2025”, hence 05/31/25 v 31/05/25.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I once did some research on this exact topic, and my findings pretty much mirror your guess.

    • Deebster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Not for me, e.g. “remember, remember the fifth of November” is how we remember the date of Guy Fawkes Night in the UK. “Fourth of July”, “14th of February”, “First of April”, etc.

      I guess you mean in the States, but perhaps they say it that way because they write their dates M-D-Y.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        So, by the time someone in the UK has finished saying the day and “of,” an American has said the month and day.

        The US is finally more efficient!

          • WR5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s only useful for the current date, or dates within your current month. Otherwise this is worthless information haha.

            “When was Archduke Franz Ferdinand assassinated?”

            “The 28th.”

  • Dr_Box@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    We don’t want or care about it. Its just the way its always been over here. Same with fahrenheit and the imperial system. I know this is a little exaggerated but imagine asking a Japanese person why they dont just speak english because its the worlds most spoken language. Its one of those things other countries like to pick on us for that I think is a little stupid. Instead you should be dunking on us for putting an orange party clown in the whitehouse. Again. But then again there are some exploitative processes that helped make that happen like gerrymandering. My point is that our shit healthcare and the majority of the things that we are laughed at for is out of our hands. Even the fat jokes can be somewhat blamed on the fact that the availabilty of cheap unhealthy food with a large portion size is greater than pricier organic options and lots of the poor tend to take that route. I’m not saying our majority is completely blameless but these are factors to consider

      • Dr_Box@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Its all good if you weren’t others would no doubt show up and begin the dunking so this is more for them than you

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s inherited from a historic convention from the UK. Historically the rationale was that the month was more important than the year, so they put it first, although this has no useful consistency or order to it.

    Unfortunately, kind of dumb decisions from the path tend to stick and keep existing for an unnecessary long time because people get used to them and then never change them. Another example is the keyboard layout you’re probably typing on. QWERTY/QWERTZ/AZERTY and so on are all typwriter-optimized. Typewriter-optimized means it’s intentionally made to slow down your typing because the old typewriters couldn’t deal with too fast typing. So the layout was made so that you constantly have to switch between rows and hit keys spread all over the place. It doesn’t make sense to keep the layout in the computer age, but since everyone is familiar with this layout, the suboptimal choice persists… Popularity can beat common sense or objectivity or things like that.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Typewriter-optimized means it’s intentionally made to slow down your typing because the old typewriters couldn’t deal with too fast typing.

      I wish that myth would die. If that was the case then E and R would be furthER away from each othER because being right next to each othER would make it likely for the two lettERs to bump into each othER.

      Contrary to popular belief, the QWERTY layout was not designed to slow the typist down,  but rather to speed up typing. Indeed, there is evidence that, aside from the issue of jamming, placing often-used keys farther apart increases typing speed, because it encourages alternation between the hands.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QWERTY

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s an apocryphal explanation for QWERTY’s design. I personally doubt it since “a” and “s” are placed right next to each other. Additionally, placing keys further apart doesn’t mean they’re slower to type. (In fact, anecdotally, it can be the opposite. In piano, incorrect fingering disproportionately affects playing keys that are right next to each other.)

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        sauce?

        some studies on keyboard layout have suggested that, for a skilled typist, layout is largely irrelevant – even randomized and alphabetical keyboards allow for similar typing speeds to QWERTY and Dvorak keyboards – and that switching costs always outweigh the benefits of further training with a keyboard layout a person has already learned

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Here’s just one, and there are many. What you cited above doesn’t contradict what I said either…my point is it wasn’t created to intentionally slow typing down

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I find that just to be because we are emphasizing the day over the month there. It isn’t independence month, it’s independence day.

        It just comes from the UK like most of our shit does. The papers that were coming from there in the 1700s when we gained our independence said month, day, year. We stuck with it. The Units came from there as well and we only modified them to keep a standard. Then we tried to go full metric, and Ronald Reagan killed it.

        That said if people are talking nonsense at a table at the bar or lunch and someone asks when you were born, they are usually expecting you to say “September” or “1949”. If they ask how old are you, they are expecting “47.”. Everything usually has context. Because usually someone only asks those questions if one they are talking about Astrological signs, or they are thinking that one age is better than another. To old to young nonsense.

    • NONE@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I speak speak Spanish, so we just say “Primero de Julio” (1st of July)" an then “Dos/tres/quince de Julio” (Two/three/fifteen of July). An of course, all are perfectly fine.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I mean that also makes sense, year-month-day. The other way of course is day-month-year, also logical, those two are in ascending or descending order.

      And then there is the American month-day-year.

      🫠

  • JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Linguistics

    In UK English, it’s considered proper to write “the 6th of March” as “6 March” and sometimes read as “6th March” which can be jarring to Americans as their shorthand is “March 6th” and when “6(th) March” is encountered in written form, it’s expanded to the full “6th of March” when spoken

    That doesn’t mean this won’t be yet another feature American English absorbs from UK English but right now flipping them in speech requires a few extra syllables and people are lazy

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why do you care? There are so many other cultural differences to highlight, history and music and art that only exist overseas, hundreds of millions of people with the same dreams and ambitions you have. Why on earth would you focus on something so trivial?

    • NONE@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      … Curiosity? Some interesting things are hidden in the most trivial information.

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Many computer systems store dates starting with the year. Isn’t that interesting?

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    They say it “June 1st”, as opposed to “1st of June”, so it makes sense to write it that way. That, mate, was a hard lesson to learn for me lol.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you saying we Americans do things in objectively worse ways, just to remind everyone what we have the freedom to be confidently wrong?

      Because I can confidently tell you there’s no examples of us doing that. (This is sarcasm, intended to amuse you.)

  • ChocoboEnthusiast@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think it’s just the way we talk. It’s just more common for us to refer to a date in speech like “Today is June 1st”. Whereas other countries would say “Today is the 1st of June”. Neither is wrong, it’s just how things are said.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s more efficient to say June 1st. I suppose you could say 1st June though. Not sure if anyone does that.

  • e0qdk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Historically, I don’t know, but personally, I prefer YYYY-MM-DD style dates they sort naturally in basically all computer software without having to think about it.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    There are plenty of other scenarios with a similar pattern of starting at the larger scale and then the specific.

    TV shows: Season 2 Episode 9

    Biblical: Book of John 3:16

    Other books: Chapter 9, page 125.

    Address: 123 Main St, Apt #2

    Phone numbers: country code (area code) locality-individual

    I’m not saying either is right or wrong, but there are precedents for either way.