I was preparing my verbal pitchforks, but it seems they have chosen a middle ground. they will only require verification for adult content, and only in the EU and UK.
which means that if you don’t need adult content or you can use a VPN, then it seems it won’t affect you. so they are probably doing the bare minimum required by law
And in terms of torrenting specifically, torrents have to explicitly support I2P. You can’t just take any clearnet torrent and expect it to work on I2P.
are you sure about that? for public torrents you just add the postman tracker and done. if libtorrent gets support for DHT over I2P, even that won’t be needed
why not codeberg? kind of lightweight on JS, but especially compared to gitlab.
and that’s good for who? who are “they” to begin with?
that would probably work. I think the IP does not need to be static, but there can be problems if your IP changes often, and it’s not updated quickly in DNS.
the only hard requirement for a local headscale (for usage over the internet) is that you are not behind a CG-NAT, and you can forward a port to your server in your router
but for the love of god and your own benefit, put a name constraint directly on the root cert
you don’t strictly need a VPS, what you need is a (mostly?) static IP address, that is especially not behind CG-NAT. if your ISP won’t give that to you, you get a VPS, because one of the most important jobs of headscale is NAT hole punching and patching your devices in
and how unambiguous is it that those are AI generated content? is it like blurry colors on images, 6 fingers and 3 hands, or what do you recognize on them?
I think I can identify generated images, but text… well I can’t even decide. Probably I just can’t so far, because I don’t remember any posts or comments that were suspicious
while dissing someone for not wanting AI in forums, for “not knowing what are they talking about”. right, they didn’t specify what kind of AI they don’t want, but I think it comes from the context that they don’t want generative AIs, because that’s what affects them negatively regularly
the first paragraph is not like in the post. did they rephrase it because of the “as it does” part?
this is the current version:
Tailscale recently announced our Series C fundraise. We were grateful for all the community support, but the Internet also raised a few of its collective eyebrows, wondering whether this meant the dreaded “enshittification” was coming next.
the internet archive does not show your version either: https://web.archive.org/web/20250702140430/https://tailscale.com/blog/evitability-of-enshittification
where did you get that quote from?
I don’t see it, which is horrific considering that others do. can you show a few examples that you think is AI slop?
let me get this straight. you like AI because a model outperformed another? how is that a real argument for any kind of question? the topic was not about whether they evolve.
that “black and white stance” is not really bad here, because it’s not actually black and white. their stance is against generative AI, not the kind you use for research. and guess what, forums are flooded by gen AI slop, the only kind of AI today that highly affects our forums.
I have this to open the site in archive.today:
javascript:void(open('http://archive.today/?run=1&url='+encodeURIComponent(document.location)))
I would love it if reddit management is so selfish that they dont care even about AI, but only their revenue.
wasp nest on a tree??
no, please rather don’t respond, especially not with an image, I don’t want to see it!
as I heard that’s pretty common at oracle, but it’s good to spread the word
it would not be a trusted service, but at most legally. just like centralized chat scanning systems.
It doesn’t even have to store the verification result, if you don’t want to
“if you don’t want to” lol. you won’t decide whether they will store anything, silly. the control is theirs, cemented, the law is on their side, the political narrative will be on their side (think of the children!!), they’ll do whatever the fuck they want.
a heavy handed approach, but I don’t see one that is not heavy handed, private, and effective enough.
slight modification: mobile phone is ok if it only has a small screen like on old feature phones, no capabilities for mobile data but only calls (that’s probably a software limitation), and no social media apps (or any installable apps).
perhaps wifi capability with a weak antenna, or a wifi interface that only supports low speeds.
private communications is a question though, because phone calls and SMS are anything but private.
hey people, this could work!
and its not like we need to ban kids from the internet, but to only allow them with the active supervision of a parent.
how would you ensure that this stays private? not just from facebook, but completely. as I see it, this would require some form of biometric authentication
firewall rules? who cares about firewall rules if the switch still forwards packets to the printer?
firewall rules only work on end devices, and routers when the destination is in a different subnet and broadcast domain.