• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Switch to Linux, today. It’s always been the better option, but for the last decade it’s been the easier option as well. Installing Linux is a walk in the park whereas windows is a Hilarious clown show from hell with no end.

    That reminds me that now in the office we’re dealing with windows machines where the network card just stops working, drivers are suddenly gone. Don’t ask, it’s windows, it’s Microsoft abd this is just considered normal. If a Linux machine has a bug it’s “oh my god Linux sucks sooo hard, it’s impossible to get it to work!” but this Microsoft bullshit just gets handwaved away with “well computers are complicated, let’s just reinstall this”

    Yes, there is still a limited set of specialty hardware that may not have drivers available for Linux, but the vast majority of people can easily run Linux and have a much MUCH better experience than windows, and that is ignoring the spyware, the adware, the ads, the plain security nightmare of having a windows machine…

    Switch to Linux, it’s easy, it’s beautiful, it’s fun. Come to Linux, come to the dark side, we have cookies

    • td_sp@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Quick glance on my installed programs, and I count 7 apps I heavily use in windows 11 with no linux version, nor a clear equivalent that could replace them without extensive hacks that may or may not work and be a total waste of my time.

      Also a funny thing: I installed Debian with KDE and then GNOME last year on another PC, and guess what? KDE & GNOME came bloated with a bunch of apps, games, office suite, code editor and other shit.

      I thought the whole shtick of Linux/FOSS was that it didn’t make any default choices for you. That’s what I always read here when people cry about windows bloat.

      The same cleanup & customization did for windows 11 I had to do to Debian KDE and then GNOME.

      Point is: it’s not that easy and being and insufferable jerk about it its not gonna solve it. Let people use what they want.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The whole schtick is you have actual ownership and control of your software. You literally just have a Windows license and in that license you have no power or control over your OS. Microsoft is definitely spying on you at this point, no question about that anymore.

        I am sensing some serious anti-linux projections. If you don’t like it, don’t use it. If you don’t like people talking about it, don’t use Lemmy and go to Reddit where there are tons of Windows bros who dunk on Linux all day.

        Point is: Your full of it and you probably want to ruin Lemmy like Reddit got ruined so you can feel comfortable in your chosen OS. Follow the granny rule, if you don’t have something positive to say just shut the fuck up.

        • td_sp@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you don’t like people talking about it, don’t use Lemmy and go to Reddit where there are tons of Windows bros who dunk on Linux all day.

          Nice gatekeeping… people like you are why these platforms are never taking off.

          My home server runs debian, my main PC runs windows 11, and I have an iPhone and it all works very well. I don’t like circlejerks, they’re stupid, specially when they’re loudly incorrect.

          Lemmy has a massive circlejerk problem to the point that you can’t even mention using proprietary stuff because you get screamed at by keyboard warriors.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think you’re confusing Lemmy’s alignment to freedom and the common good with a circle jerk. Most of us are here because we don’t want to be bound by the limits of centralized, proprietary social networks, how can you be surprised that the people here try to make the same choice in other aspects of their lives?

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Quick glance on my installed programs, and I count 7 apps I heavily use in windows 11 with no linux version, nor a clear equivalent that could replace them without extensive hacks that may or may not work and be a total waste of my time.

        if you tell us the names, maybe someone can help

        Also a funny thing: I installed Debian with KDE and then GNOME last year on another PC, and guess what? KDE & GNOME came bloated with a bunch of apps, games, office suite, code editor and other shit.

        that’s the decision of the distribution, not KDE/Gnome. often it is configurable in the installer, even in debian to some level.

        The same cleanup & customization did for windows 11 I had to do to Debian KDE and then GNOME.

        to be fair if uninstalling unneeded programs is the only thing you do on 11, you’re leaving in lots of things.

        Let people use what they want.

        I agree that insufferable jerks are insufferable jerks, but I don’t think most people want to use windows 11, but that’s what they can use, for one reason or another, some of which have a solution, some of which not yet. if anything, I would bet money most would rather just stay on 10.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seriously. If you’re used to fiddling with Windows and especially if you have installed Windows recently, go try something like Linux Mint. Just the install process will blow your mind. And then wait until you get a system update and it doesn’t affect what you’re doing!

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah I guess I left that part out! It’s funny because like so many things in Linux, you have all the power but you often don’t need to use it because the same problems just aren’t there.

          You get to decide when to apply the updates, but they are so quick and unobtrusive that I choose to apply them immediately!

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That reminds me that now in the office we’re dealing with windows machines where the network card just stops working, drivers are suddenly gone. Don’t ask, it’s windows, it’s Microsoft abd this is just considered normal. If a Linux machine has a bug it’s “oh my god Linux sucks sooo hard, it’s impossible to get it to work!” but this Microsoft bullshit just gets handwaved away with “well computers are complicated, let’s just reinstall this”

      Ah, yes, that. I switched in 2011 and the first impressions were about how flawless everything is compared to Windows.

      the plain security nightmare of having a windows machine…

      Eh, about that - Linux really isn’t immune to that. Just right now Windows is still by far the more profitable target.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Linux security is not perfect, nothing is. But compared to windows security? Come on, seriously? Is .exe still the extension that’ll automatically execute a program?

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not sure this is anywhere near what a security comparison would look like.

          And the fact that the traditional Unix security model is being augmented with ACLs and selinux and what not hints, that it’s not sufficient. And what these things are being used for is, well, similar to Windows security model.

      • Trafficone@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s better now but twenty years ago some Linux distros were so insecure out of the box that you could be fully owned if you logged into the wrong network.

        Even still, I don’t see most distros leverage the security capabilities that running Linux enables. Linux runs the server side of the internet, being a niche os isn’t the security silver bullet it once was.

        • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Pretty sure this guy didn’t use Linux twenty years ago. Outside of very basic computing, Linux wasn’t very useful.

          • Kevin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve been running Linux exclusively since 2001 or so. It was rough around the edges back then, but it was useful enough for what I needed.

            You had to choose a good distro on that note; redhat, mandrake, etc broke on me so many times, and I was only able to fully switch after finding slackware, which was rock solid.

            • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I remember suse and Debian where ahead of the curve back then. Package managers really changed the game when they started showing up around then. I will admit I’m probably a little too cynical. But I had to run windows through college for various software, and until recently playing most games on Linux was quite the challenge. Steam has truly cracked the code. So I’m dipping my toes back into Linux for daily use. I’ve been running my truenas server for a few years now and run several Linux VM’s so I’m not starting from scratch.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Installing Linux is a walk in the park whereas windows is a Hilarious clown show from hell with no end.

      As a server maybe. Switching everything on my desktop to Linux has been a constant fight against all kinds of problems and there’s several things I haven’t been able to get working at all. Microsoft’s constant enshittification is closing the gap and it’s currently a tossup between which one I’m going to land on but that’s not Linux improving so much as Windows getting worse.

      • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s very hardware dependent with a few problem’s like Nvidia. For Best results go established brands that support Linux like thinkpads.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That advice doesn’t help much when I already have all the hardware. The whole point is not having to buy new shit.

        • sykaster@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Exactly, I have a bunch of weird issues when running Linux on my Lenovo Legion 5 Pro with an RTX3060. So unfortunately I w9nt be switching until the situation improves.

          It’s not even about gaming either, virtually all animations are like 2fps, no matter the drivers or power management. I wasted days on this with some guys from the Lenovo Legion Linux discord server, and some with exactly the same laptop don’t have the same issue, but windows runs fine.

          It’s a real shame that, maybe on the next laptop!

    • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      But what if we already use Linux? Can we still have some cookies? Or is this new users only?

  • Redx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because it’s so hard to use Rufus and make a win 11 install that bypasses the tpm requirements.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Cause your use case is the only one that exists, of course.

      Companies are reluctant to use this method as theres no telling what will break due to TPM being disabled. Some will still use it as they have no other choice though.

    • guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      having to use hacks to get an operating system installed shouldn’t be needed.

      requiring a Microsoft account to use Windows also shouldn’t even have been considered.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That and having to manually upgrade CUs. It just doesn’t scale. It’s easier for most people to buy a new machine.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s easier for most people to just continue using their current PC past the end of support.

  • plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can hear the ‘just use Linux/BSD/etc.’ crowd already clamoring in the comments, and will preface this by saying that although I use Linux and BSD on a nearly daily basis, I would not want to use it as my primary desktop system for too many reasons to go into here.

    Still though.

    🐧

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I just switched to Linux mint as a HTPC and it works great! Wine and Bottles bridged most of the gaps in software availability.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I would not want to use it as my primary desktop system for too many reasons to go into here.

      https://twitter.com/MayaPosch/status/1809311467545735654

      The Linux kernel not having a stable driver ABI is why Linux will never amount to anything outside of some embedded and server applications.

      — Maya Posch, author of the submitted article

      I guess maybe that’s their reason.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        FreeBSD has stable ABIs (inside one major version).

        Anyway, this is not an answer, NVidia drivers had a binary part and a part compiled during installation for the specific kernel version, that’s one possible solution. Linux developers are ideologically against this, yes, and don’t want binary drivers to be first-class citizens.

      • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        never

        That tweet must be some kind of joke, because I don’t know what to make of the many people who use Linux outside of embedded and server applications. And it doesn’t even have to be my hearsay because the Steam Deck is exactly such a device.

        In fact, I have a USB audio interface which I use near daily on Linux that has no driver support in modern Windows, because the vendor only provided beta support for Windows 7 as that OS was releasing. By Windows 8 it was unsupported. So the journey of that device is XP->Stable, Vista->Stable, 7->Unstable, 8±> Non-functioning. If the driver ABI were so stable, why does my device not work on Windows anymore?

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This rings a little hollow to me. Most of the people I know that understand Linux can quickly summarize why they might not use it as their daily driver (eg staying on macOS for graphics/video or staying on Windows for desktop Word/Excel). If you can’t summarize that quickly, it really makes me wonder if you really understand it. I’m not trying to No True Scotsman my way around it; I really don’t understand.

      • Darren@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Personally, I’m sticking with macOS as my primary OS until the point that Asahi solves DP alt mode and I can run two displays from it.

        My 2014 Mac mini runs Mint, so I’m more than happy to dive in to Linux as my main.

      • AliasVortex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right? I tried to switch my primary computer (framework laptop) to Linux earlier this year and ended up going back to windows after I had absolute nightmares with my type-c KVM. Coupled with performance issues while gaming (and the absolute hassle of having to force games to use my graphics card). Add in whatever random issues I was getting trying to remote into other windows machines on my domain (for CAD work). My day job is in software engineering/ programming, so I’m not exactly a stranger to digging through documentation and fixing computer issues, but spending time fixing my computer instead of using it got old pretty quick.

        Perfectly happy with Linux in my HomeLab and on my steamdeck though!

        • thesmokingman@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          See‽ Easy explanation. I get it, absolutely reasonable issues, and one of several areas Linux just isn’t great with. “Too many issues to explain here” doesn’t click with me.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The reasons I personally know are “I have to use an app for work, there is no interoperable alternative, I have no leverage to replace that entire ecosystem and it won’t run with wine” and “It’s a company-issued device where I have no rights to change anything anyway.” Combined, they make the reason that my work Laptop runs Win11, but my private PC is Linux through and through. I’d like to be able to use said app on my private PC too, but if it doesn’t, no big deal.

  • Steven McTowelie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It may be a bold of me to say, but I hold the controversial opinion that I don’t really give a shit which computer OS you use. If you can use a mouse and keyboard to navigate a desktop environment then 🤙 you are ahead of the curve at this point.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    ROFL no. I once knew someone who got offered an upgrade from whatever to Windows 10, only for it to fail half way through because their CPU was some weird corner case that the OS thought it supported but when it was time to boot… didn’t.

    Also if you want to talk e-waste, look no further than Chromebooks.

    Windows 11 has problems, this is hardly one of them.

    • Baguette@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Chromebooks sound good in theory but fall short because kids are great at breaking them and there is a lack of repairability.

      There is also chromeos being kinda ass

      • coffee_tacos@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Idk about the lack of repairability, those things are really easy and cheap to fix in my experience. They are at least no less repairable than 95% of laptops on the market.

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    what a bizare take to suggest hoping for ReactOS to mature before using Linux as daily driver. A lot of the current reactOS app compatibility depends on WINE implementation anyway.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      ReactOS is a very fun project, but anyone expecting it to be a real useable OS is absolutely mad. It’s been going for almost 30 years, and they’re almost at the point of binary compatibility with Windows Server 2003…

  • _synack@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had a Windows 10 laptop that has a CPU not supported by Windows 11. It’s not e-waste, though. It just runs Ubuntu now.

  • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fucking Christ, you have choices people. If windows won’t meet your needs anymore, USE SOMETHING ELSE! Why do these people pretend there are no alternatives to windows?!

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are no alternatives to Windows. You will join us. Embrace ☀️. Extend 🌈.Ȩ̷͙͙̺̰̦͊̏͜x̷̱̹̃t̶̡͉̍̋̌̿͗̈́͘í̴̡̼̱̫͚̺͙̉ň̶̛̮͠ģ̴̛̹̮͎̏̓u̷̢̢̜͊̆̈̉͐̑i̸̛̪͔̤̰͚̾͌̈̍͜ͅs̶̳̜͎͓͚̣̼̖͌̇̈́͊̌͋h̷͉̹̄͐̋̐͛🌚.

    • dumbpotato@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why do these people pretend there are no alternatives to windows?!

      They’d have to admit they were wrong.

      Most people are incapable of doing this unless they literally have no choice.

  • medem@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You can argue all you want about TPM and its ‘security’. I ALWAYS thought that forcing users to use TPM 2+ hardware is planned obsolescence and nothing/no one will convince me otherwise.

    The only thing affected users can and should do is to leave that PoS of an ‘operating system’.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s not PoS. At its core Windows NT is very cool, and the Windows subsystem for it is not terrible.

      What’s PoS is that the only way you get it is with such a heap of garbage, that you can’t see the good parts behind it.

      And even its developers seem to have forgotten those good parts, I wonder if they ever change anything there other than “closing” vulnerabilities with yet another condition in some long-long switch … case … statements.

    • TheProtagonist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have a custom built PC running on Windows 10, which has no TPM and therefore cannot update to Win11. I might consider Linux as an alternative on some regular laptop, but I’m afraid that my games might no longer be running if I switch the OS from Windows to Linux.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Proton has come a long way.

        The only game I can’t play is fortnight, and that’s because Epic won’t enable the anti cheat to run on Linux, not because the game doesn’t work.

          • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            As another person mentioned Proton is Linux’s compatibility layer for Windows applications, from my understanding it installs necessary .NET frameworks and other dependencies into a fake C:\ drive an then utilizes that fake C:\ to trick the game into thinking it’s running Windows.

            Every windows applications I put through Proton has not once failed to open. Now the claims that Anti-Cheat for games isn’t supported is purely false, most popular anti cheat’s do support Linux however, it’s entirely up to the publisher to tick the checkbox to allow Linux users to play.

            Battle eye, Punk Buster, Easy Anti-Cheat all support Linux natively.

          • nightlily@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s an extension of WINE, a compatibility layer that allows Windows apps to run on Linux, with better support for games. It’s what the Steam Deck uses.

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Adding to what the others were saying, proton has an unaffiliated website for reporting purposes, protondb.com. It tallies user reports of the games working or not. The data is associated mostly with steam libraries.

            I don’t have a lot of games in my steam library, relatively speaking, barely over 100. But there are zero games that would not work on Linux for me:

            In this context Platinum means it works out of the box, Gold means some users experienced minor issues (mostly older reports by nvidia users) that required some tinkering with launch options, such as setting an environment variable. Silver and Bronze mean gradually more tinkering required but still works. This excludes native apps (which do not use wine/proton) and borked apps (of which I own zero).

            Note, that this is a translation layer, not emulation, and often games can have better performance under Linux thanks to the system not getting bogged down by the OS itself.

            Also note, that 99% borked games are due to kernel level anticheat and DRM being implemented improperly by the game developer, which proton can’t handle. You can still make it work under Linux, but you’d actually require emulation for that, instead of proton.

            Edit:

            Another screenshot of the top50 played saturation to show you what to expect.

            • TheProtagonist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              OK, thanks for the information, that sounds really interesting. I was playing Doom Eternal and Metro Exodus some time ago, but I made a bread and didn‘t pick it up anymore due to a lack of time. Many years ago I was also trying a bit of Linux on a Netbook (small notebook). By then it was really a different world than Windows.

              However, I am not sure how easy that is to manage with getting the right Linux distribution, then Wine, then Proton and then getting all tricks and tweaks right… - I am not a tech expert, so leaving a system that works out of the box is a bit of a hurdle for me.

              What would be the best Linux „Distro“ (I guess that‘s how it is called) to start with? I would prefer if I would not have to deal with command line stuff… ;-)

              • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                People keep saying Bazzite now for distro. But as a relatively new linux user (since last summer) I’ve managed to make things work with Linux Mint, arch and Fedora no hassle.

                Heroic launcher (GOG, Epic) or Steam will handle proton&wine for you. Just need to check a check-box in the game’s config on whether you want to run native or proton.

                • TheProtagonist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Which Distro would you recommend for a relative newcomer? My PC was once “high-end” but is already a bit older (2016/17?). Still quite powerful, I guess.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Linux is fantastic for gaming. You’ll even see performance improvements. The only games that have problems are those that intentionally block linux, like Destiny 2, but they’re not worth playing.

        The places you are likely to run into problems is with certain desktop apps. For example, the Affinity suite or software designed to support specific devices or peripherals. But if gaming is your focus, Linux is genuinely a better choice than Windows all around.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        For what it’s worth, I switched 2 years ago and have yet to run into a game I wanted to play and couldn’t. There are some glaring holes, mostly around “serious e-sports” games that have overly invasive anti-cheat (or devs that specifically choose to block linux) that won’t work. Riot and Epic both seem to have a hard on for blocking linux users, as an example.

        But here’s the neat part. You can make the switch and see, and it costs you nothing. If you are in the minority that it just won’t work for and have to switch back to windows, you are in the exact same spot you are in now, with nothing lost but a bit of time.

      • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Almost every single modern game runs on Linux, i always thought it was an issue but in reality it just works out of the box most of the time.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        try them out. the only real exceptions are some multiplayer games that are specifically blocked on linux. anti cheat itself is working, its up to the companies to let us use it.

        a lot of games run faster, even through proton.

      • Spaniard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        What games? Even games with EasyAntiCheat work in Linux nowadays, but it depends on the devs.

    • ThePrivacyPolicy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve converted a ton of my older family to Linux, it does everything they need as far as web browsing and some basic office applications, and it offers a polished enough UI these days that most barely tell it apart from windows, some even prefer the UI more. Even 2/3 of our home systems have gone full Linux now too (no more dual booting) and handle all my own gaming, audio and programming needs. I really hope this message keeps getting out there and we can cut back on ewaste and forced obselence.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can’t wait for the surge in cheap PCs available to buy and install Linux on. Please, Microsoft, lock down Windows more.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The writer clearly understands that something isn’t adding up with Microsoft’s claims about TPM, but nowhere do they address the accusations that Microsoft plans to use it as DRM (and potentially spying).

    Similarly, only supporting certain CPU’s is suspect as hell. Between all this and Recall, it really feels like the driving design focus behind Windows 11 was to build the best spying machine they could.