• NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    45 minutes ago

    I asked ChatGPT to make a cutting edge, unique, creative, evolutionary meme that appeals to Gen Z and…this is what it did.

    Ew.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 minutes ago

      The capybara with airpods, lol. Are capybaras particularly popular with Gen Z?

      It’s interesting to me to see the airpods aren’t even in its ears, which I take as the LLM not recognizing that the capybara’s ears are ears. Or maybe it doesn’t recognize that airpods belong in ears, and just sees that it generally goes on the side of the head where ears usually are. It really is fascinating technology, shame it’s used in the way it is.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 minute ago

    By definition AI is an attempt to imitate the source material, so yeah, it can only be a little worse or a lot worse, but never better.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Even worse is, many AI generated memes also feel like if they were made from vague prompts the AI did not correctly understood.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’ll take your shittiest MS Paint meme over your finest AI design.

    I want the human element! I’m not relating to a machine. I want something made by another ghost in a meat suit.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ve always seen the anti-AI movement as pro-corporation. It’s mostly for the benefit of the copyright industry while its already quite easy to decouple yourself from the corporate aspects of AI with its open source options.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        that implies it’s the corporations that make art. the idea of art coming from corps is already a gross injustice to artists, but at least they can get paid a little. to take away what they do entirely for something that literally only remixes existing art from past and present artists is one of the darkest things we’re coming to accept in our late stage capitalist society.

        we simply do not want artists anymore. we’d rather the machines preform every task that’s worth doing so that we can all go slave away at manual labor as human labor continues to get cheaper than machines.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 hours ago

    GIMP is not low effort. If you can ‘quickly assemble’ memes, it’s because of previous effort. (I’m studying to be someone who can quickly assemble memes in GIMP)

    That program has a unique UI philosophy. Does it resemble Photoshop? I’ve never used that.

    • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Gimp 3.0 is finally actually something you could use to make something quickly

      It still makes some baffling decisions (seriously I fucking hate that deselect is CTRL+SHIFT+D and not CTRL+D. I get why, shift is the “opposite” modifier, but GIMP is the only software I use that does this) and isn’t perfect, but for meme making and general Internet use it’s probably at long-last ready

    • Novaling@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Never used Photoshop either but from the way everyone and their mother compares it to GIMP when complaining about the UI, I think it’s safe to say GIMP sucks in that regard.

      I’m not gonna lie, the few times I’ve used GIMP to crop a picture, I felt lost as hell.

      • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        GIMP feels like it’s still in the stage of being extremely powerful but awkward as heck to wield, like Blender used to be. Blender used to have a pretty unintuitive interface before getting a massive overhaul a few years back. GIMP could use a similar facelift IMO.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Drag never got truly proficient with Photoshop. Drag took a class on Photoshop in high school and did well, but then forgot everything. The workflows never became natural.

          Drag has made dozens of memes in GIMP and really understands the design philosophy. It feels simple and intuitive. Drag wouldn’t want them to change everything and make it like Photoshop. Then drag would have to learn it all over again. No thanks.

          Different apps should just be different apps. The goal isn’t to get every system to have the same UI. There should be room for creativity and thinking differently in the design space.

  • Petersson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Chatbots: Fuck you

    Image AI: Fuck you

    Partially use of AI in complex film productions etc: Fine

    Plant recognition: You’re cool

    Surveillance AI: Fuck you

    Scientific use of machine learning: Great!

    Commercial AI in general: And fuck you, I’m out!

    • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Chatbots: Fuck you

      Really? Honestly it’s the most innocent use if you’re not the kind of person to get hooked on them

      Image AI: Fuck you

      I get why people have this harsh stance, but without my locally-hosted AI doing concept work for me then my avatar as you see it here wouldn’t exist nor would an artist be considerably more wealthy than they were before I commissioned them. I get that I’m in the minority by a wide margin, but people like me exist in decent amounts too

      Commercial AI in general: And fuck you, I’m out!

      Yeah, commercial AI is the problem. I cannot begin to understand being upset at someone running it locally and not for profit though, which happens a lot

      • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        I agree, locally hosted AI tools for image or text generation don’t use lots of power, only do what a user wants and not what a corp wants, and are a valid hobby or working tool. It’s sad that so many people are blinded by their hate towards corporate AI and don’t differentiate.

        I am a terrible artist, but if i need a quick picture for a presentation or just a new desktop background, i sure as shit would never commission something but would just go without if there’s nothing with a CC license that fits. Today i have the possibility to get exactly what i want, and not one byte gets transferred outside of my home network, There is no lost sale for any artists, and i still have something that is aesthetically pleasing.

        Same with chatbots - i mainly use them as a quick reference for commands when i don’t want to read 15 screens worth of man pages or when i am again stuck creating a RegEx.

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Data analysis and forecasting chaotic systems too complex for brute force numerical hijinks are great applications for neural networks. One dude I saw was doing his PhD on nowcasting (weather forecasts of the very short term (10 to 90 min. range) showers and thunderstorms with neural networks. Interesting stuff.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The average anti-ai zealot only know about Diffusion and Large Language models because they once used ChatGPT for 15 minutes, read some memes and are now an expert on how AI is ruining society.

        • Deme@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          To be fair, the sloppier side of AI has a much more direct effect on society than niche scientific and engineering applications, but I get what you’re after.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Oh yeah, most people see AI as ‘the thing that has made search completely unusable’ and not ‘The thing that has solved protein folding’.

            It’s like the Internet is full of cavemen who are screaming and throwing rocks at a fire while, elsewhere, others are building jet turbines and combustion engines.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Plus we’ve had that shit in research since I was in grad school over a decade ago. People acting like machine learning is new. Smh

  • tonyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Pretty strong reaction to the equivalent of a paint mixer for text…