• mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      39 minutes ago

      It’s not just that. If it was, I’d have been convinced by the new-era freedom fighters using fucking ai horde, or whatever sloppers call their latest open-source [citation needed] model instance.

      The biggest issue is the shameless, continuous abuse of creative workers by sucking up all their works without consent.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve always seen the anti-AI movement as pro-corporation. It’s mostly for the benefit of the copyright industry while its already quite easy to decouple yourself from the corporate aspects of AI with its open source options.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        that implies it’s the corporations that make art. the idea of art coming from corps is already a gross injustice to artists, but at least they can get paid a little. to take away what they do entirely for something that literally only remixes existing art from past and present artists is one of the darkest things we’re coming to accept in our late stage capitalist society.

        we simply do not want artists anymore. we’d rather the machines preform every task that’s worth doing so that we can all go slave away at manual labor as human labor continues to get cheaper than machines.