• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    To be clear, the bill prevents regulation. It’s not a regulatory ban, it is a ban on regulation.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bundling issues together like this should not be allowed. It’s done by everyone, and usually done to hold the actual good parts hostage. Oh you want to prevent asbestos from being used because it’s killing people? Well the only way you get that is by also allowing employers to hire 4 year olds.

    • bpev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      tbf, I don’t know how feasible it is to remove asbestos without employing 4 year olds.

    • brot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, and sneaking in such a thing at the last minute is also antidemocratic.

  • Dave.@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    "automated decision systems "

    “IF X THEN Y” satisfies this description.

    Soooo basically just take the handbrake off practically every chunk of software ever written then?

    • fxdave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      When the marketing went too far that it brought AI the wrong meaning.

  • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you want to stay on the bleeding edge you’ve got to be a reversal of Europe, which means allowing innovation and competition. Hence why VT is nearly 70% US.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    its hilarious how this party would tought state rights. only rights for things they can’t currently get themselves at the federal level at any particular time.

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Could we just…call everything AI then and it cant be regulated. Cause that would be hilarious.

    • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s funny but sad. Vague, selectively-enforcable laws are the point.

      We can’t just call something AI to prevent regulation.

      They can, though. With “laws” like this, the government can freely pick and choose who is punished and who is protected.

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Someone needs to spin up an AI that continuously generates pictures that annoy Donald Trump and posts them to all social media, it should actively learn what makes him and his supporters feel the saddest and optimise for those attributes.

  • oakward@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is going to kill the content creation industry. Imagine a torrent client that has a built in neural network training module. You are now allowed to access any IP protected content and inspect it on your home TV for dataset building. What the neural network does is irrelevant, it can have a couple of layers and be trained with a residual amount of the CPU load. Happy torrenting :)