- cross-posted to:
- usa@lemmy.ml
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- usa@lemmy.ml
- news@lemmy.world
one small win for local AI, one giant loss for the school system (and others).
Huge loss for the environment, big win for AI stocks!
To be clear, the bill prevents regulation. It’s not a regulatory ban, it is a ban on regulation.
Bundling issues together like this should not be allowed. It’s done by everyone, and usually done to hold the actual good parts hostage. Oh you want to prevent asbestos from being used because it’s killing people? Well the only way you get that is by also allowing employers to hire 4 year olds.
tbf, I don’t know how feasible it is to remove asbestos without employing 4 year olds.
Yeah, and sneaking in such a thing at the last minute is also antidemocratic.
"automated decision systems "
“IF X THEN Y” satisfies this description.
Soooo basically just take the handbrake off practically every chunk of software ever written then?
When the marketing went too far that it brought AI the wrong meaning.
Did chatgpt propose this?
the fuckening is upon us, ladies and gentlemen
Son of a bitch!
If you want to stay on the bleeding edge you’ve got to be a reversal of Europe, which means allowing innovation and competition. Hence why VT is nearly 70% US.
its hilarious how this party would tought state rights. only rights for things they can’t currently get themselves at the federal level at any particular time.
deleted by creator
Never was.
Land votes and some people were constituionally sub human…when was is democratic?
As always they were just polished turds.
We know! You don’t have to rub it in…😞
Please rub it in, until we go away or improve.
It might change some folks unchecked insanity.
At the very least we could stop letting senile, narcissistic, psychopath children decide everything.
No one should be allowed to be this dumb, unchecked.
Plutocracy!
May the highest bidder win.
I’d say it’s more of a kakistocracy right now.
A bit of both.
Could we just…call everything AI then and it cant be regulated. Cause that would be hilarious.
It’s funny but sad. Vague, selectively-enforcable laws are the point.
We can’t just call something AI to prevent regulation.
They can, though. With “laws” like this, the government can freely pick and choose who is punished and who is protected.
Someone needs to spin up an AI that continuously generates pictures that annoy Donald Trump and posts them to all social media, it should actively learn what makes him and his supporters feel the saddest and optimise for those attributes.
deleted by creator
Fine, I won’t complain when Yudkowski’s followers take matters into their own hands.
This is going to kill the content creation industry. Imagine a torrent client that has a built in neural network training module. You are now allowed to access any IP protected content and inspect it on your home TV for dataset building. What the neural network does is irrelevant, it can have a couple of layers and be trained with a residual amount of the CPU load. Happy torrenting :)
Deepseek biding their time
Exactly… “Deepseek is a threat against our freedoms!!” also “No one can make any laws to put any restrictions on any AI models”. Cool.