• Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    I mean, this level of Darwinism would be fine. What grates me is not recognizing the effect it has on others.

    Still seeking an analogy where not eating food somehow puts a neighbor or classmate at risk of starvation.

  • Ronno@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    True, I usually refer to something similar: Do you know how many people die in bed every year? Perhaps we should ban beds.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You know what every living autistic kid have in common? They all eat!

    dramatic music sound effect.wav

  • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    To be fair, food is a significant contributor to the existence of adults. And we all know those are problems.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        On one hand, food gave us Hitler. On the other, that dude actually killed Hitler. So…

        • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Would you say they’re pedophiles if they’re children themselves? At the end of the day you are raised not gifted intelligence.

            • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              This is where we get into the worse debatable territory. Is a 17 year old an adult because if you say yes a lot of pedophiles will love you a lot more now. How about 16 if we can go down to 17 why not just go below, say a 14 year old should understand enough. Hell if you teach a 12 year old properly they should know enough to be treated this way as well they might just not know how terrible they are. See why it’s important to make the distinction between child and adult? So I’m going to ask again is a 17 year old an adult to you?

                • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 hours ago

                  If you don’t then you ignore everything we have been for and throw yourselves to the nature state because you can undermine law whenever you feel like it. This doesn’t matter until you realize the law is the only thing holding us back from killing each other. Go search up jury selection and understand even they cannot have any level of bias to the case.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Even then, starving your own children isn’t going to cause their classmates and teachers and those people’s families to also go hungry. OP’s comparison is extremely forgiving to those dipshits.

  • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Do your research” is a dogwhistle and of course what it really means is “Google what you want to be true and read all the shit from morons like you who agree with you.”

    • Luffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They don’t stop eating. They will stop their kids from eating because they have been already vaccinated, so they can’t live without eating, but their children can

  • lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I feel like it’s probably worse than this. It should start with “I read about this thing called ‘choking to death’”.

    Or better yet, take out “choking to death” (which can happen) and insert some made-up bullshit like “choking so hard your eyeballs pop out”.

    • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      But they are not afraid of children dying, that’s totally fine. They’re afraid their kids might become “weird”. Because that is how they see autism, as being weird.
      And as everybody knows weird is literally worse than death.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If you want to be really pissed, read up on doctor disgraced former doctor, lifelong charlatan and grifter Andrew Wakefield. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wakefield

    He abused autistic kids in a medical experiment that was meant to convince both the public and the scientific community that a specific combined vaccine (measles-mumps-rubella, a.k.a MMR) could trigger some kind of bowel disease that causes autism, all so he could peddle his own alternative that is three separate shots.

    • Lucien [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      20 hours ago

      And here’s the kicker: he did that because he was financially invested in the company producing the older, separate vaccines.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    People would rather there kids die of Measles than have Autism

    Obviously vaccines/environmental factors/food coloring doesn’t cause Autism but if we play along with the RFK Jr. narrative that’s basically what they are saying. Also the RFK Jr. research is specifically funding people can find a link. They will find a link because of conformation bias.