Summary

The White House Correspondents’ Association canceled comedian Amber Ruffin’s headlining appearance at its annual fundraising dinner.

The decision follows concerns over Ruffin’s anti-Trump comments and growing tensions with the Trump White House, which has restricted press access and pool assignments.

The association’s board voted unanimously for the change, seeking to avoid political division.

This shift mirrors its 2019 approach, when historian Ron Chernow spoke instead of a comedian amid similar Trump-era scrutiny.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Trump has no sense of humor. The only reason he ever smiles and laughs is when he knows he’s getting something over on somebody.

    It’s not a shocker that he couldn’t even handle the mildest of criticisms from a comedian.

    • sporkler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The lizard suit wasn’t even designed to do that, but he’s such a great man he made it happen anyway.

  • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Once again demonstrating their collective cowardice…

    Obeying in advance. Can’t risk upsetting Don Mangolini. The Mafia Admin wins again.

    🙄 🙄

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Seeking to avoid political division… through appeasement? Has that ever been effective? The press truly has abandoned their responsibility.

      • gramie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve heard persuasive arguments that Chamberlain did the only thing possible for Britain at the time. Their defense industry was just spinning up and they needed more time to have any chance at facing Germany. The Spitfire had only just started production, for example.

        • punksnotdead@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Germany’s military industry was also trash at the time. Buying time for Britain’s defence also bought time for Germany’s offence.

          If France, Britain, etc did something sooner rather than later a lot of bloodshed would have been avoided.

          The World At War is an incredible documentary that covers it quite well.

          https://youtu.be/4AA0lWwTXNc

          “Since the French spurned any notion of taking the offensive, the Maginot Line ironically protected Germany better than it protected France.” Narrator, 8:10

          “A few French divisions advanced 5 miles. But they didn’t even try to penetrate the Siegfried Line, at that time still unfinished. And while Poland fought on, there were no German tanks at all on the Western Front.” Narrator, 12:40

          “If ze French Army would have attacked in beginning of September wiz zere very strong superiority in division in armoured cars well act all armoured cars in ze Western Front at zat time. In artillery, in air force, we ze German forces in the so called Western Front could stand no more than 1 or 2 weeks.” General Siegfried Westphal, Staff Officer Western Front, 14:05

          • gramie@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            At the start of the second world war, Germany was much less mechanized than other countries. I think the US had one car for every five people, the UK one car for every 10 people, France won car for every 15 people, and Germany one car for every 30 people. Something like that.

            The Germans used more horses in World War II than they did in World War I.

            The thing was, what they did have they used effectively, including using radios for communications, which none of the other countries were doing at the time.

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wasn’t it a correspondence dinner that is considered to be the day he decided to run for president because he was on the verge of tears being made fun of

  • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lmao “seeking to avoid political division”. No you’re avoiding dissonance. The GOP MO is to stoke political division, it’s literally what gives them power.

    Also “anti-trump” comments instead of just calling them concerns or critiques.

    Language like this is how consent is manufacturered. Language is powerful at subtly shift how one percieves a situation, and leading people to a predetermined conclusion.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you think of “unity” like the Nazis think about it, then yes.

      BTW, that’s how they have been describing it to others online for over a decade, too…if people they describe as “Communist” which means, in the Venn diagram, anyone who is !Nazi = “Communist”, would just agree to stop fighting fascists, there will be unity. Also, “peace”. Interestingly, it’s how one of the magoffs that worked on/supports Project 2025 talked about their plans, too. Oh, and Putin talks the same way.