Whelp. This is the party that lost against Trump in 2016 by shafting Bernie. These Democrats deserve to lose the election but as usual, the consequences will be suffered by the common people. So one cannot even gloat over them losing a safe bet again.

And downright shallow as well!

It is what it is.

But you can’t kiss a duck on the lips from the word go. Just ask Neil Degrasse Tyson.

That’s what happens when you forget but keep trying and then make a new post about it.

Doesn’t exist in German? What about “Frohes Schaffen”?

You know what doesn’t take effort? Writing stupid lists like that for other people to follow.

Boss is a lazy SOB.

Let me guess, it’s about…leather-upholstered furniture?

It’s like old people on Facebook. ORDER CORN

Wrong.

“Most US voters say” AKA Not Gonna Happen.

Honestly I don’t understand why Iran hasn’t felt some very real consequences for its support of Russia yet. Like, why do the factories producing Shahed still exist?

ITT: Because it would be and possibly poisonous.

You have my sincerest thanks. 😃

As I’ve said before, the distinction between countable and uncountable quantities is lost on most people nowadays. In my opinion, the rampant overuse of the word “amount” (instead of “number”) is the clearest indicator of this problem.

*skellington

Sorry if I was wrong about the prevalence of such protections. My perception may be biased because the notebooks used by our company are all equipped with a switch or shutter of some sort. (HP brand, IIRC) Regarding your second point, however: surely a shutter physically obscuring the camera lens is just as effective as disconnecting the camera when it comes to protecting the user’s privacy?

They often come equipped with a privacy slider to cover the lens. Or you can just put a sticker on them.

Or, or, hear me out: just close that cesspool right down to make the world a better place.

Didn’t you know,? Protecting citizens is “communism” and therefore “un-American”.