• SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Copyright is far too long and should only last at most 20 years.

    Actually, George Washington would agree with me if he was still alive. He and the other founding fathers created the notion of copyright, which was to last 14 years. Then big corporations changed the laws in their favor.

    • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hot extreme opinion: copyright shouldn’t exist, and authors should be covered by other means, particularly public funding based on usage numbers and donations.

  • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Chick-fil-A isn’t that great.

    I would never eat there because of their bigoted politics, but I am always shocked at how many people act like they can’t live without it. Weird.

    • recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It shouldn’t be taken as scientific truth but it can help you know yourself and others better, and it’s an insult to compare it to astrology because at least it’s not based on completely random things like the position of the planets when you were born. The issue is that most people only know MBTI as online tests, which are self-report and have extremely vague and stereotypical questions that can very easily be manipulated to get whatever result you want, with the worst offender being the most popular one, 16personalities, which isn’t even an actual MBTI test but a BIg 5 one (which is not to say Big 5 is bad, but it’s very misleading to map it to MBTI types). In reality to use MBTI somewhat effectively is going to take studying Carl Jung’s work, how MBTI builds on that, lots of introspection, asking people about yourself, and lots of doubting and double checking your thinking. And very importantly you have to accept that in the end this all isn’t real and just a way to conceptualize different aspects of our personalities and it’s in no way predictive, you have to let go of stereotypes, anyone can act in any way, it’s just about tendencies.

    • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I used to think this, but I think the new posh astrology is mental disorders in general. It costs thousands of dollars to get professionally assessed, whereas MBTI is a free quiz online. Crippling anxiety, depression, OCD, panic attacks, etc., are the new ENFP

      • charlytune@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        That doesn’t stop an absolute fuck ton of people believing in it. One of my friends is quite deeply into it, she’s in FB groups about it, and decides what everyone’s type is upon meeting them. According to her I only think it’s nonsense because I’ve only done the free online tests, not the proper one. She wouldn’t listen the other day when I tried to put her right about flouride in the water, either.

        • kshade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sounds like the test itself isn’t the problem but how it’s used and how much people attach to the results, like with IQ tests. Neither that nor Myers-Briggs should be part of interviewing for a job either but apparently some US companies do it anyway.

          • FunctionFn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, the test itself is definitely the problem. Regardless of whether you believe a personality type test can be effective, the MBTI is particularly and provably ineffective in just about every measurable way:

            It’s not reliable. It has terrible test-retest reliability. If I’m X personality type, I shouldn’t test as X type one time, and Y type the next, and Z 6 months laters.

            It’s not predictive. If a personality test accurately judges someone, it should mean you now know something about someone’s behaviours, and can extrapolate that forwards and predict behavioural trends. MBTI does not.

            It fundamentally doesn’t match the data. MBTI relies upon the idea that people fall neatly into binary buckets (introverted vs extroverted, thinking vs feeling, etc). But the majority of people don’t, and test with MBTI scores close to the line the test draws, following a normal distribution. So the line separating two sides of a bell curve ends up being arbitrary.

            And finally, it’s pushed very hard by the Myers-Briggs foundation, and not at all by independent scientific bodies. copying straight from wikipedia:

            Most of the research supporting the MBTI’s validity has been produced by the Center for Applications of Psychological Type, an organization run by the Myers–Briggs Foundation, and published in the center’s own journal, the Journal of Psychological Type (JPT),

            • recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I risk sounding very “AKSHUALLYY” here, but online tests do a huge harm to the credibility of MBTI, no wonder it gets such a bad rep when the tests are so unreliable and people nevertheless base their entire personalities on it… Originally it’s not supposed to be based on the binary choices of the 4 letters but the “cognitive functions” as defined by Carl Jung, which a lot of people will find to be just as much non-sense but with the right attitude I think they’re a useful tool to learn about ourselves and others.

  • Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Humanity cannot and will not change its practices fast enough to avoid running out of resources we keep ourselves dependent on because it’s “profitable.” We are a doomed species and won’t be around for very much longer. We are likely living in the flash of bright before the long dark. I don’t think the world my grandchildren live in will be remotely like the one we have now.

    I’m perfectly fine hedging my bets and living life normally, but I think our longevity is an uncomfortable truth most people don’t want to face.

    • Ergifruit [he/they]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      correct. also daylight savings and the 12-hour clock is bullshit. we should at least have Greenwich/UTC as a secondary clock, kinda like how some regions have their own calendar and have the Gregorian calendar as a secondary.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Timezones are stupid and using European as the reference is imperialistic. Every clock should be set to the time calibrate where I live.

    • tomatolung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      As a seafarer who moves through the world, arguing out of timezones is an uphill battle. (Minus the half hour timezone insanity.)

      Daylight savings on the other hand, can be dropped like the smelly turd it is.

    • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah yes, as if anarchism, liberalism, libertarianism or really any other human ideology and methodology centered entirely on egoism don’t engender some strange communal cargo cult behavior. It’s almost as though they too are full of shit?

      It is funny to believe in ‘self-determination’ when you can’t even recognize that all the important decisions have already been made for you. It is rich to pretend to fight against the nihilist when you only believe in yourself. So go egoist, live your life as you please, blissfully unaware that you are just as stuck the very herd of individuality that we all find ourselves in.

    • Looming mountain@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      As soon as you have any actual answer on how to demonstrably improve peoples’ lives and do this either within this system in a way that they’ll let you, or without this system in a way that they won’t assassinate you, I’m with you. I’m serious about that. But you don’t have an answer, I already know, because all I see is posturing and arm chair theorizing.

      Edit for Michael Parenti who ofcourse has absolutely amazing things to day on the issue: https://youtu.be/6gtUaGV6mNI?feature=shared

        • Looming mountain@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          At least those people are looking at places where actual revolutions happened and were sustained. Contrary to the US, where unions get busted, action groeps cointelpro-d, leaders assassinated, police violence used, and only the threat of the USSR to gain any social progress. And where QoL is on a steady decline? Please give me a better example.

          Furthermore, historically, no one socialist nation has ever existed without being under continuous attack from those very forces - religious, fascists, corporatists, so I don’t know what your on about. You’re clearly passionate but I read your comments as incredibly idealistic to a fault.

          Edit: and what’s happening now is the very likely possibility of a 2nd Trump administration and this insane 2025 plan they’re cooking up. So I don’t even know where you are getting your information.

  • Xariphon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Young people are people and deserving of rights, including but not limited to the vote. There is no stupid thing a young person could do with their vote that old people don’t already do and we don’t require them not to in order to keep their vote.

    • qooqie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      When I was mid 20s I thought young kids were too naive. I got older and saw how fucking stupid most adults are and think young kids are much smarter than their predecessors. They should absolutely have a voice in elections. 16 seems like a good age to me

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    My opinion is this: if you can’t be bothered to use proper grammar and spelling and express yourself clearly, you should shut the fuck up.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you‘re black, gay, immigrant or mentally ill, you should shut the fuck up /s

      What you wrote is basically the same as the above text.

      Making mistakes with spelling is not laziness. It is most likely a sign of either a neurological difference (dylexia, adhd) or plain stress. It could even be a stroke.

      There’s unpopular opinions and being elitist. The former is cool, the latter is not.

      • flicker@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes. Exactly.

        The thing is, the guy? The character of The Piano Man? He’s a fucking dick! He spends the entire song singing about every single person in this bar, boiling them down to one or two of their least desirable traits- which, by the way, he’s obviously been playing at this bar long enough to get to know all of them well enough to boil them down!- and then he sings about how great he is and how he’s the only joy in their miserable little lives!

        I want to get the waitress who’s practicing politics, the men sharing a drink they call loneliness, the businessmen getting stoned, and we are gonna write a song called “The Piano Man is a Fucking Dick Who Thinks He’s Too Good to be Here!” Fuck that guy!

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you actually want to do some about climate change, step 1 is to stop having kids.

  • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Air fryers are only popular because Americans have been using microwaves to cook for decades, which are possibly the worst cooking devices ever created.

    If they had decent fan ovens during that time, they wouldn’t be anywhere near as popular

    Conversely, air fryers are seen to be popular in the UK, because nobody will admit they fell for the advertising, and now only use them for chips