IDF: Whoops, tee hee.

              • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Their father has a choice. He should act in a way that’s in his children’s best interests but if he thinks attacking Israel is more important, then the consequences will be his to live with.

                I agree with you it would be better if he were simply killed, though; that’s certainly the position Israel takes on the matter.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wtf is that mean. Tunnels aren’t communication devices. Also Hezbollah famously has vast tunnel networks under southern Lebanon.

      • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wtf is that mean.

        It means you have to actually go to the tunnels and fight, like the IDF is doing.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh I didn’t realize you go “into” tunnels by indiscriminately bombing the things above them.

              You learn something new every day.

              • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sometimes you bomb them so you don’t have to, or to block a means of egress. Either way it’s a legitimate military objective that justifies civilian casualties.

                People could just leave the area, though. It’s not like Israel doesn’t tell them about the strike.

        • Womdat10@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, I love going into tunnels by bombing hospitals and orphanages full of civilians, it’s my favorite method. Also, are you suggesting that hamas doesn’t use communication technology?

          • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why is a military tunnel under a hospital? (I don’t believe that Gaza had a single orphanage.)

            • Womdat10@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              First of all, I’m pretty sure it was proven not to be, but you can fact check me on that. Second, if it were there, it likely wasn’t intentional. Third, they could have bombed the tunnel without hitting the hospital, because it wouldn’t have only been under the hospital. Fourth, and again you can fact check me in this, but it would be pretty strange for a large city to have no orphanages.

              • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/02/12/world/middleeast/gaza-tunnel-israel-hamas.html

                Second, if it were there, it likely wasn’t intentional.

                It connects to, and opens into, a hospital referred to by the New York Times in 2008 as “the de facto headquarters of Hamas.” So clearly pretty intentional.

                Third, they could have bombed the tunnel without hitting the hospital

                They did bomb the tunnel without hitting the hospital.

                Fourth, and again you can fact check me in this, but it would be pretty strange for a large city to have no orphanages.

                There are zero orphanages in any American city, for instance. Not strange at all. Orphanages are kind of an archaic and disused way to handle the case of orphaned children - modern societies use a foster system, instead. Gazans simply don’t care so they make no provision at all if the family doesn’t step up, so they don’t run orphanages either.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct IDF kills Palestinians as their core job, similar to Waffen SS and their war crimes.

      Mossad kills people outside of Palestine to let normies know Israel is dangerous.

  • kingshrubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Terrorism is bad and we should condemn it. Unless it’s done by the United States in which case we should call it “anti -communism or defending democracy”. Or if it’s done by Israel we can call it “self-defense”.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whatever Israel is doing can just be added to the United States. In the end, Israel is just the guard dog “defending democracy” in the Middle East. A somewhat rabid guard dog, but still owned and fed by the US.

  • overt_mess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But how would they arbitrarily punish everyone without carpet bombing? It’s not like everyone has a pager.

  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mossad: “Making 40,000 pagers full of C4 and then convincing everyone in Gaza that they’re hip in 2024 is not profitable! What are we, Apple?”

    Also Mossad: “But what about Lebanon?”

  • npz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well they’re still blowing up kids with these things so idk if it’s the most brilliant targeting technique

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an Obama type technique. Sure, you might blow up a few innocents, but the rate of eliminated enemies vs killed innocents is better than in traditional warfare, so a numbers guy would always go for that one.

      • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Leaked official documents show that that wasn’t really the case as the public was led to believe

        Quotes

        The White House and Pentagon boast that the targeted killing program is precise and that civilian deaths are minimal. However, documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse.

        The documents show that the military designated people it killed in targeted strikes as EKIA — “enemy killed in action” — even if they were not the intended targets of the strike. Unless evidence posthumously emerged to prove the males killed were not terrorists or “unlawful enemy combatants,” EKIA remained their designation, according to the source. That process, he said, “is insane. But we’ve made ourselves comfortable with that. The intelligence community, JSOC, the CIA, and everybody that helps support and prop up these programs, they’re comfortable with that idea.”

        The source described official U.S. government statements minimizing the number of civilian casualties inflicted by drone strikes as “exaggerating at best, if not outright lies.”

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Compared to dumping white phosphorus over hospitals and refugee camps, killing 2 (?) children during an attack that targeted hundreds/thousands is many orders of magnitude more precise. I hate dead innocents as much as anyone, but you gotta admit the pagers were effective and included way less collateral damage than the methods Isreal has employed in recent history.

      The point of the post isn’t to praise the pagers attack. It’s to point out that Isreal is capable of causing less collateral damage in Gaza but chooses not to.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fucking weird comment.

        but you gotta admit the pagers were effective and included way less collateral damage than the methods Isreal has employed in recent history.

        Yeah. No I don’t.

      • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do realise targets in Gaza and targets in Lebanon are not the same? On one hand you have fighters shielding themselves behind civilians and dont even know what a pager is and why they would use it, on the other hand you have political and operative leaders on these fighters that need these pagers to stay low profile and untaped…

      • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        but you gotta admit the pagers were effective and included way less collateral damage than the methods Isreal has employed in recent history.

        Do you admit that mass gas chambers are an effective way to kill people ?

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its accepting Israeli propaganda to say that this was a precision strike. This is like using cluster munitions.

      Whenever Israel comes up with an idea for an assassination they do it because they can. Its a force of habit for them.

  • pyrflie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Room had too be made. Same as what’s happening in the West Bank right now. The Lebenon isn’t an expansion target.

    None of this should be a surprise to anyone.

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hamas != Hisbollah

    But I start to wonder if they Knees about the planed attacks and let them happen to start this massacre.

    It feels like the all seeing eye of Mossad was ignored on purpose. I hope Netanjahus Name will be branded for ever. He deserves no good mention in History of humanity.

    On the other side… humanity faces the biggest historic event ever and no one cares (climate change)

      • Zement@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you imply the wrong thing here. of course they probably do, but what is the core of your statement?

        Mine was:

        Netanjahu (Not all of Israel and definitely not all Jews) wants this genocide. He needs it for his own survival, to a point where he gladly accepted the rape-murder of Festival crowd… not any festival, a Hippie-Goa-Festival full of people who would never vote conservative, so a scapegoat the conservatives gladly gave.

        Conservatives globally are such a vomit inducing Subgenre of human scum. Hamas and Hisbollah ARE conservatives too… the liberal-green-peace-people have no representation in this world filled with hatred. Quite the opposite, they are vilified and killed.

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It took them years to prepare that operation. It was against Hezbollah, not Hamas, because they saw them as the bigger threat.

    The war in Gazah is barbaric, but the sensible immediate alternative would have been a very targeted operation to find and rescue the hostages, not something like this.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And it required Hezbollah to have no concept of logistic security. Maybe Hamas is not as amateurish as Hezbollah in that regard.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Historically Hamas has been the amateurs and Hezbollah the pros. Hezbollah has actual victories against the IDF. Hamas’ military success last October was completely unprecedented. Its generally believed that Hezbollah trained Hamas into the fighting force it is now. And since Iran trained Hezbollah you get people claiming Hamas is an Iranian puppet.