I understand that it may be problematic sometimes but this was very smooth. I didn’t even say anything.

A: what’s your number for the whatsapp group Me: I don’t have whatsapp because of facebook. B: ok, we have to use signal then A: ok

And that was it. Life can be very easy sometimes

  • SLfgb@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Signal is so bloated compared to Conversations on Android. Also it’s a walled garden requiring your ph number to register (edit: and requires owning a smart phone👎). Based in the US so not great for privacy. Marginally better than Whatsapp suppose.

    Edit: and it requires a smart phone.

    • SLfgb@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Signal app size 165MB. Conversations: 42MB.

      I can’t message someone on Signal without installing Signal or Molly which also uses Signal servers, which has to be trusted on good faith (can’t run my own). Ergo a walled garden just like Whatsapp.

      I can’t register with just a username & password. I have to trust their PR saying they don’t store my ph #.

      US has some of the worst legislation when it comes to privacy; when the agencies decide they want your data, Signal will not be allowed to tell you. And don’t give me the bs line that they only store 3 pieces of info about you. Unless you’ve built their server software you don’t know what they collect am store.

    • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not that I will convince you to use signal, but there are desktop versions as well, so technically not required to use a smart phone.

  • THCDenton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If i ever get a job and have to use whatsapp, im using to use all those stupid stickers in every message i send

    • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Pretty much the entire world, except the US and Canada, is WhatsApp based. Every job chat, every message you send, it’s all WhatsApp. Heck to pay for parking or to get immigration visa services from the government, it’s mostly WhatsApp. And yes you can send stickers.

      Sometimes Lemmy loses perspective that the way 300ish million people do something is not that relevant to the other 7500 million.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t know what pretty much „the entire world” you’re talking about but Im pretty sure whatsapp has no official uses in this little known continent called Europe.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Popularity has little to do with quality. And that applies to iMessage as much as WhatsApp, Facebook, or any of the other communication channels that dominate due to network effects and switching costs.

      • glaber@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        The former Soviet Union, China, Korea and Japan are big exceptions to this though

        • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          I’m currently in a former USSR country on holiday and everything is WhatsApp and Telegram. Delivery drivers to government services.

          Japan is still on floppy disks attached to carrier pigeons.

          China is WhatsApp for every non Chinese even with the ban. Wechat for everything else but you need a Chinese mobile.

          Korea surprisingly is using WhatsApp more than even prepandemic. Almost all my Korean friends are now WhatsApp versus like 1 just 5 years ago. Telegram is also popping up there.

          But point taken. A few bubbles of differences but WhatsApp really does rule supreme.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Why would a workplace need a group chat? Aren’t there any enterprise tools in place to achieve that?

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I used to work for a small PPI claims management company. Our accounts team had a WhatsApp group for social discussion outside of work.

      All of our internal work comms were handled through Slack.

    • Baggins@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Cannot access work intranet (Teams etc.) from personal phones. Don’t have work phones. They all use WhatsApp so reluctantly, so do I.

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        I would never join a group chat like that. If they need to get ahold if me after hours, they can call me.

        BTW Teams doesn’t live on Intranet. There’s no reason they wouldn’t be able to open up Teams to BYOD beyond incompetence.

        • Baggins@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          I know Teams doesn’t live on the intranet, but I’m not going to put work software on my own phone. Policy needs it to set up a work profile and I then can’t use fingerprint, face or a 4 digit pin. And all the shite that flows through Teams would be be piling up, just like it does on the PC at work, brilliant when you’re only in a couple of days a week. They want me to use a phone? Provide one.

          The WhatsApp group is for us to send updates about traffic, if someone can cover a shift etc. it’s not an official work thing. I could of course not use it and just text people. That’s really just making my life difficult whilst sat up here on my high horse with a self righteous look on my face, whilst I miss the chance of an extra shift.

          • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            Denying putting work stuff on your phone is absolutely valid. The company should provide a company device in that case. And if you do agree to put company data on your phone, they should give a monthly stipend towards your phone bill. That’s how every org I’ve worked at has approached it.

        • daellat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Really depends a lot on the groupchat. I was apprehensive but it’s quiet there and overall the things that get sent there are either in office hours (e.g. “internet might be out intermittently we are working on a fix”) to links to pay for something someone paid for outside of work like food or drinks.

          I don’t mind it that way, maybe once a week a couple messages

        • filcuk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          That requires a business login on your personal device, which is typically against company policy.

          Although, so should be sharing work info outside of corporate channels, so what do I know.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        In these companies, does anyone check the licenses in details to make sure using them is ok for the company?

        Meta will get at least the metadata: meaning they will record who was in which call connecting from where.

        For example, if one member is visiting a client, Meta may be able to infer the relation between the 2 companies.

        If any of the people in the room click “report”, then the discussion is sent for review without the encryption protection

        I’m pretty sure their user agreement translates to “you agree to let us do whatever the f*ck we want with the data you’re purposely disclosing to us”.

        And last but not least: if Meta decides to wipe the archives, any info get lost?

        There a reasons large companies ban unauthorized apps to talk about work.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Emergency team chat when there is a outage of corporate systems

      Chat for social work stuff like team building or off-site gatherings.

      Being about to shit talk about corporate stuff off the reservation is nice.

      It can be a big sms group chat, signal, discord, whatever your team likes.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        …to which for privacy reasons your team shouldn’t like SMS, Discord, Telegram, Slack, and probably even Signal (somewhat for privacy, & more for accessibility)

          • rcbrk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            XMPP. A business can self-host, there are public servers, or there are many businesses which offer customised xmpp hosting as a service.

            I can be federated with other xmpp servers or be a locked-down work-only service, or federate with chosen other servers (such as a client company’s xmpp servers).

            • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              30 days ago

              The main problem is, you need to have someone good enough to setup a proper firewall when selfhosting.

              Sure, it might not take $$$$, but it will take $, which is definitely more than\ \ \ \ .

              • toastal@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                Snikket exists for this type of user. If money is an issue, since XMPP is actually lightweight unlike Matrix, you can host multiple things even on the cheapest VPSs so it isn’t dedicated to one taskl or self-host out of your home (which is what I do, but also with some small sites, a feed aggregator, Mumble, terminal sharing, Darcs/Pijul version control systems, & Nix remote builder).

                • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  Skill issue, not money issue.

                  But when you are a business, everything can be converted into a money issue.

              • rcbrk@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                30 days ago

                If that’s the main problem then that’s easy to solve! Simply use a free public xmpp server.

                I mention the self- and paid-hosting options because businesses tend to like having a sevice agreement backed by a contract, and may have additional specialised requirements not provided by free services (xmpp or otherwise).

  • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    People dont install Signal for me, especially feo groups. They use arguments like “yeah, and I also might have reasons not to use Signal like I do with Whatsapp”

    Kinda disrespectful to put a line against a data selling app and comparing it to “nah, I just dont wanna”

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    For people wondering how to do this in your own lives, have two phones. Have a phone that you install work stuff on, including proprietary apps like WhatsApp. Just tell the people around you hey you can contact me on WhatsApp, but I only see it when I’m at my desk during business hours. I do use more privacy focused platforms on my personal device that you can reach me anytime, such a signal or simple x or matrix. And you’ll find a lot of people are very flexible as long as you give them some reason, and you’re not being unreasonable yourself.

      • speeding_slug@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        I disagree. I absolutely love the fact that I can just turn it off after office hours and throw it in a corner during holidays and weekends. Sure, it’s a bit cumbersome to take two phones with you, but it’s also cumbersome to take the laptop and everything with you all the time. Just put it in the same bag and you’re good. Good to note, my employer provides me with a phone, so I didn’t need to buy a second one. It also means that if I switch jobs, I just return the phone and still have my personal device.

        But if it doesn’t work for you, by all means, don’t do it. For me the good outweighs the bad.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      There is an app on f-droid called “shelter” that gives you access to Android Work Profiles. This is a sandboxed area of your phone that makes it function like a second phone. You can install apps that are only accessible from within that sandbox. You can install a second, sandboxed copy of an app. You can shut down all your sandboxed apps simultaneously.

      I have a bunch of bullshit, garbage apps I very rarely use installed in my sandboxed “work” profile (Facebook, restaurant apps, and some other assorted trash apps) so they won’t harass me at random.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Shelter is great, and work profiles are an amazing tool to have.

        My intention with having two phones, one always at your desk for work items, is to set coworkers expectations that your not available on corporate systems 24/7. If they want to reach you outside of business hours, they will need to use better platforms. This demonstrates your being reasonable and using Whatsapp (or whatever) to be on the main platforms, but you have a real motivation to use the better platforms (like signal, etc)

  • xelar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Still, you were lucky that your colleagues are aware of alternatives and will use it (I hope). I wonder though if people will migrate because of you. Its tough to encourage others to communicate Signal while majority use Messenger or Whatsapp. Their reasoning for that is the most friends and family member are on mainstream solutions.

    Signal is an interim solution imo for most people, which I also recommend. Not too extreme, not to “geeky”, which introduces them to alternative app world.

  • abbenm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    For a second I thought you meant you don’t use Signal, so they all went there on purpose to avoid you.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m assuming OP didn’t just accept a position with the fucking Hezbollah, so Signal probably fits his usecase

      It’ll be fine. If the fucking CIA wanted OP to spill the beans they’ll just send an agent with a wrench directly to OP’s kneecaps.

  • shadowwwind@fosstodon.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    @GravitySpoiled I love this, I had a very similar situation with my sports group, litte questions asked as well! Best thing was the reaction from the leader “I you are kind of right anyways, we should get rid of WhatsApp.”
    Problems only appeared later down the line with people complaining that they don’t get notifications and it’s not a habit for them to check it, so they don’t see new messages.