I’ll go first. Mine is that I can’t stand the Deadpool movies. They are self aware and self referential to an obnoxious degree. It’s like being continually reminded that I am in a movie. I swear the success of that movie has directly lead to every blockbuster having to have a joke every 30 seconds

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The original Star wars trilogy was overrated, the sequels were underrated, and I’d rate them all to be equally mediocre.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The best thing about Star wars is the world building. The expanded universe with the books, comics, and cartoons contain much better stories than any of the movies.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        A New Hope is solid. You can find blemishes, and they’ve torn new ones with the “special editions” that just cram more CGI shit on the screen for no reason, but as a classic Hero’s Journey movie A New Hope works rather well. It was amazing for its time; I mean, a fun Sci-Fi movie? With special effects this good? It was a cultural phenomenon for a reason.

        The Empire Strikes Back is the best Star Wars movie that has been made, which is why when most people quote Star Wars they’re actually quoting Empire. The characters are at their deepest, the setting feels the most magical, and the Luke/Vader saber fight is utterly gripping.

        Return of the Jedi was the beginning of the “Lucas is a genius who can do no wrong, do everything he says” era. The “let’s put a funny thing in the background” starts happening. We get Jabba’s hedonism palace with the droid torture room, Bikini Leia, Ewoks, and lightning hands Palpatine. This would only get worse by the time the prequel trilogy is made, Lucas gets to make whatever he wants without question.

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Horror movies are unfairly judged because most people who do not like horror movies watch them for the wrong reasons.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Tarantino is trash and Ruins movies that should be good with weird edginess. Django unchained would be 10/10 with someone else as director. I never saw a good movie from him. I DK how death proof scores as high as it did. I gave that a 2/20. what a waste or kurt Russell and other good actors.

  • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The critic rating is better than the audience rating. I’ve never seen a film with a high critic rating that didn’t have something worthwhile about it. But I’ve seen a lot of audience hits that were garbage.

  • NightGaunts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Batman returns is really dumb. The movie craftsmanship (or whatever) is well done but the premise is just so stupid (to me). I feel this way about all super hero films, I just can’t get past that the source is comic books for kids. I cannot take them seriously.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      What do you mean? There are so many styles of animation, you mean like Pixar movies all look the same?

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s nothing great about Studio Ghibli movies, they have appreciable hand-drawn effort but that isn’t what makes a movie.

    • ShustOne@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Alright this one got me. I can’t imagine some of the stories doing absolutely nothing for a viewer and them thinking they are so-so.

    • bestusername@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Right, outside, lets fight!

      Those movies are amazing, maybe what you’re missing is that the age of the main character is the age of the target audience.

    • Entropywins@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know…I watched princess mononoke and was pretty impressed by the movie. Only other anime I’ve watched is ghost in the shell which I thought was alright. I’m not really an anime fan but I’m super glad I watched princess mononoke!

  • bestusername@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Can I do a TV show?.. I’m gonna do a TV show.

    The Mandalorian is boring!

    They should have called it “Shiny Boba Fett and Baby Yoda travel planet to planet doing stuff”.

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Tarantino is overrated. You have to watch a lot of movies to come to this realisation, because otherwise you don’t realise his movies are often in large part a collage of other movies. Movies which did what he does better. That means that it doesn’t actually matter that Tarantino is overrated for most movie goers. More generally, this is why critics’ opinions don’t actually matter that much. They’ve watched too many movies and likely know too much about movies, to tell the average audience goer if they’ll enjoy a movie.

    Once you’ve watched a few thousand movies, and especially if you’ve ever studied film or read a few books about it, you’ll often find you enjoy interesting but shit movies more, than very well made but unoriginal movies. People who truly love film, invariably aren’t snobs. They enjoy absolute trash, they enjoy arty farty stuff. If someone has a related degree or even a doctorate or works in the industry, the likelihood is high that they’re also a fan of B-movies. They don’t need to pretend to be knowledgeable, because they are. A film snob will bore you with the details of a Tarkovski movie. A cinephile is more likely to bang on about 80s horror movies, lesbian vampire sexploitation movies, Albert Pyun’s Cyborg, or Troma’s The Toxic Avenger.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh, wow. Old comment.

        The easiest route to learning about movies, is to watch a lot of movies, and reading about the movie you’ve just watched. Wikipedia, a more in depth review, interviews with people who made the movie (not just the actors).

        Google a top 100 list. Work your way through a few of them. Eg.

        https://www.bfi.org.uk/sight-and-sound/greatest-films-all-time

        They also have cool features. For example, Michael Mann’s made a load of really cool action movies. Here’s a feature on his movies they made:

        https://www.bfi.org.uk/features/where-begin-with-michael-mann

        Or here’s famous critic Mark Kermode’s top 10 of horror movies:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qdj_22hHRyM

        Yes, he has a PhD and is a member of the British Academy of Film and Television Arts, the UK equivalent of the Academy of Motion Pictures. No, he’s not a snob. Texas Chainsaw Massacre’s in the top 10. So are some older classics, which are still good.

        But if you want to read something, you could try:

        Bordwell and Thompson. Film Art: An Introduction.

        David A. Cook. A History of Narrative Cinema

  • eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I actually liked Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets. Both main actors were objectively terrible, but I still liked the movie 🤷‍♂️

    • speck@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ll do you one better: I loved Matrix Resurrection. Great satire and the real sequel to the first one