• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Normally I’d be suspicious of these kinds of megastructure projects but Vegas is the city that figured out how to get damn close to net zero water use from the Colorado so I’m willing to start off with the benefit of the doubt for the city leaders that ok’d this.

    • visnae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Before the Sphere, the largest spherical building in the world (since 1989) was the Globe in Stockholm.

      On it they sometimes project stuff on, which seems to be a way cheaper and energy efficient way than adding a billion LEDs.

      Fun fact about the arena Globen, it’s actually the biggest piece in a art installation about our solar system, representing the sun. Pluto is about halfway up in Sweden.

      It’s also the home arena of Swedens national ice hockey team.

  • xthexder@l.sw0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know what they need so many GPUs for. There’s 16 displays inside, and the sphere itself has fewer pixels than even 1 of the internal displays. You could probably run the sphere off a laptop if you aren’t trying to do anything fancy.

    Maybe they plan on doing crazy live simulations on it or something. I can’t imagine what kind of displayed image would actually use all 150 of them. Nvidia A6000 cards are damn powerful.

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess the practicality of the decision depends on the finances. Did they actually buy the cards or were they gifted by nvidia for free advertising?

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It does seem suspiciously like they picked 150 completely arbitrarily to make the project sound impressive, when they could have easily done it with 20. I’m sure a bunch of people in the middle made a bunch of money off that transaction too. Or like you said, maybe this is Nvidia doing some guerrilla marketing

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My job has been to run things on GPUs for almost 10 years now. The only thing anyone practical is doing on that many GPUs is AI training, massive scientific simulations, or crypto mining. 1 or 2 of them is enough to run something like ChatGPT.

        Real-time graphics it turns out don’t scale well across multiple GPUs. There’s a reason SLI has gone away for consumer GPUs. At the current ratio, each of those $3000+ GPUs is only driving 8000 pixels (assuming each led puck is being used as 1 pixel, given their size). It makes no sense other than bragging rights

    • Yardy Sardley@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably have a few cards running the displays and the rest of them mining some sphere-themed memecoin

  • xthexder@l.sw0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So how is the total power over 500x that of the GPU power? If it’s all LEDs, that thing must get brighter than the damn sun.

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Add a solar array and battery bank, a you might even have electricity left over. It’s in the desert after all.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The power usage wouldn’t be a problem if the electricity were generated in a green way.

      If only the energy sector had a workforce experienced in building offshore structures that could build offshore wind farms. And maybe a workforce that had experience in drilling that could develop geothermal energy.

      Of course we also need an energy sector that had a lot of financial resources to put into these kinds of investments.

      If only the energy sector had these kinds of resources, a big sphere drawing a lot of electricity wouldn’t be a problem.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    28,000,000 watts

    That’s usually written as 28MW. I know some Americans don’t like metric much, but one of the points of metric is that you don’t ever need to write that many zeroes - you just need to use the right prefix (kilo, mega, giga, tera, etc) on the unit.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but 28 million watts really puts things in perspective when your average PSU is less than 1000w.

      • magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. This is literally a PC gamer article. Writing it out like that really puts it into perspective for the average reader.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true.

        average PSU is less than 1000w

        Unrelated but I wish it was easier to find lower-wattage PSUs. My local PC store doesn’t have anything under 650W. I know modern GPUs use a lot of power, but not all PCs use a GPU! I have a home server where 400W would be more than enough, yet the smallest I could find was 550W, in stock from just one manufacturer (Be Quiet).

        • tomkatt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, it should be fine, just because the PSU can provide more watts doesn’t mean the system is actually using that much power. I have an 800w PSU in my gaming rig, but its average load is only 240 - 320w during gaming (I’ve measured it by powering the system with a portable Ecoflow battery).

            • riodoro1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Where are you getting this from? Intuition?

              I think the quiescent current and losses are less in a well engineered psu.

              • hedidwot@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is verifiable in manufactures data sheets.

                Efficiency at less than 20% and greater than 80% loads isn’t great relative to in between those ends.

                This is compounded by lower wattage PSUs being more limited with regard to features and benefits.

                If you end up with a 650w PSU and your system idles at 80 watts for the bulk of a working day you spend long periods of time in this less efficient window.

                We need to see some quality 300w to 600w designs come back onto the market.

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      you just need to use the right prefix (kilo, mega, giga, tera, etc) on the unit.

      Oh, thanks.

      Bruh, it’s PC Gamer.

      quick edit: Hey! Why aren’t you converting it to Joules?

      • Remavas@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Joule is the SI unit of energy, meanwhile the Watt is the SI unit of power, equivalent to one Joule per second.

        “Converting” joules to watts would be like converting m/s to US dollars.

        • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I liked the analogy but I do think it would be clearer to say something like joules = money in bank account and Watt = spending per second

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love this kind of shit. Building things for the sake of it is worth it. Not only as just expression, which may be hubris but it’s still expression. Also entertainment, inspiration, pushing the art of engineering, and just giving people something to do, and all the good that comes with that like personal and trade growth.

      A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure but we’re burning tons of coal to have this thing advertise minion movies, not anything artistic or worthwhile.

      • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This isn’t pushing any boundaries, though. This is off the shelf technology. Anybody can do something big by throwing a shit ton of money at it. It would be pushing boundaries of tech or art if it was for instance super power efficient, or mind bending in any way. This is a fucking sphere, it’s the simplest shape and a rip off of the pyramids but less original and not even comparable in terms of durability.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Could it not be argued that building this thing now gives people a chance at looking at the power draw and attempting to make it super efficient? Like now people have a tool to test things on.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They did mention that they are working on making 70% of this powered by solar panels. Maybe this will push forward solar technology in some way.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is absolutely pushing boundaries to be driving this many pixels at a frame rate that doesn’t take minutes to refresh. I build a lot of projects with addressable LEDs and the typical hobbyist stuff chokes out when you start trying to control more than a thousand or so. This thing has 256 million pixels inside and 1.2 million outside.

        • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If this is something you feel strongly about, then please stop eating factory farmed meat and animal products if you havent already. It is something you personally can actually do. It helps, and it will genuinely make you feel better. You may not have much power, but using the power you do have to help the team you claim to be on instead of the other team is a massive step forward.

            • treadful@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You came in here with your absolutist utilitarian life above all else or we all die post just to respond with this because someone suggested you to stop eating meat. Beautiful.

            • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t agree. The comment points out the single most easy and effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit. It’s not about animal rights and not about your health. Us still eating meat even though we know better is an incredibly dumb waste of energy for the sake of pleasure, exactly like this shitty powereating globe.

              • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Take a train instead of a flight. Cycle to work or take public transport instead of driving. Install a heat pump or solar in your house. There are a million things people can do to cut down their emissions that can be as effective as becoming herbivores, depending on each one’s personal situation.

                Plus, I don’t have the numbers in my head but I’m pretty sure a locally grown fillet of chicken is more environmentally friendly than an avocado that has travelled across the Atlantic, so “buy local” would be probably better advice.

                • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, so many things one should do. Yet nothing is as simple as paying for a different product next time you’re shopping your groceries.
                  Avocados are way less harmfull to our planet than local meat. People keep bringing this up so often it’s part of the Vegan Bullshit Bingo.

                • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And you are one of those “every problem on the planet is the fault of someone else other than me so I can do whatever I want with no regard for it’s affect on anyone else” people. Stay away from us if you can’t be bothered to carry your own weight, you just drag down people who actually give a shit about something other than their own immediate selfish gratification.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The comment points out the single most effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit.

                eating meat doesn’t emit co2

                • danc4498@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Producing that meat does.

                  Note that the commenter didn’t say to quit all eating meat. They just said to quit eating “factory farmed” meat.

                  It’s not about eating meat, it’s about factory farming the meat and the damage to the environment caused by it.

            • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not vegan, and I never said anyone should be. Factory farms are the issue, not the consumption of animal products. Get some eggs from a local farmer, no big deal, enjoy, they’re delicious. Just don’t think for an instant that you have no guilt if you are shoveling a huge portion of the cash you earn to billionaires who torture animals and destroy the planet. You are guilty if this is what you do, and no amount of idiotic anger towards vegans who point out the obvious will make you innocent. You have to actually change if you don’t want to be responsible for this. Angrily trying to shut down anyone who points out your disgusting selfish addiction won’t do you. Grow up or shut up.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It helps,

            no, it doesnt. despite the existence of vegans, meat production increases every year, year over year.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Advertising? This thing is essentially a theater. Yeah, it can run advertisement but anything with a screen can do that. It’s like saying a movie theatre is for advertising.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a 400 foot tall screen that’s constantly on and in view, even at night, which plays ads like 90% of the time. Calling it “essentially a theatre” is a huge understatement.

        • Vash63@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But the energy usage is quoted as peak for the entire venue - which is literally a theater / concert hall. It opened with a live U2 performance. The energy usage isn’t just for the displays, it includes all the power for the entire building, the concert speakers, heating/cooling, indoor lighting, any kitchen equipment, etc.

        • blakemiller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This way some faulty internet lore. The money losses were from a fluke of timing the opening date of operations versus when quarterly finances were reported. Big startup costs meant the first numbers looked silly until they had enough events to get steady profits. They’re doing fine now.

          Internet should’ve known better too. It’s hard to lose in Vegas and the investors obviously knew what they were doing. The power costs are shocking for sure though. Yikes!

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably because they’re not doing much with it. It’s $100/person to see the basic “Planet Earth” showing and almost $200 to see The Grateful Dead show. Previously they showed a Phish show. That’s it for options, and none of it sounds really appealing to me.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vegas is almost entirely powered by the hoover dam. It’s already pretty green as far as energy goes. The question will be where do they get their power from in a few years when lake mead dries up.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        In addition to the other thing, dams have a dramatic and disastrous impact on the ecology in the immediate area and the entire riparian system they connect to. It’s “green” in terms of emissions but they’re still harmful and we should be phasing them out for lower impact alternatives as much as possible.

        • rogue_scholar@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Should? Definitely, but let’s be realistic, we can barely get people off of coal and oil right now.

          In the world we live in, Dams have some of the lowest environmental impact compared to the other places we get our energy.

          So we probably shouldn’t be trying to phase them out while there are much more severe effects being felt from the other base load facilities.

      • HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not true. The Hoover Dam contributes to Vegas’s power supply, but it’s nowhere near “almost entirely powered” by the dam, except in Fallout: New Vegas.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s no such thing as “ASAP” for nuclear power. If you had the permits signed off today, it would take 10 years before a single GWh of new nuclear energy goes to the grid.

      Instead, maybe we shouldn’t build giant spherical advertising displays?

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no such thing as “ASAP” for nuclear power

        Sure there is. It’s just that the P stands for “20 years from now.”

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t just one GPU be enough to run the Sphere, or a I getting something wrong?

    I remember hearing about that it’s not exactly high resolution, each “pixel” being a bunch of pretty large lamps.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wikipedia says it’s 16,000x16,000 (which is way less than I thought). The way the math works, that’s 16x as big as a 4k monitor, so 16 GPUs would make sense. And there’s a screen inside and one outside, so double that. But I also can’t figure out why it needs five times that. Redundancy? Poor optimization? I dunno.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But wouldn’t that be only necessary if it needed to render real-time graphics at such a scale? If I’m correct, all its doing is playing back videos.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s doing some non-trivial amount of rendering, since it’s often syncing graphics with music played live.

      • Mark@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I work for a digital display company, and it is definitely redundancy. There will be at least two redundant display systems that go to the modules separately so they can switch between them to solve issues. If a component fails on one side they just switch to the other.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Someone elsewhere in the thread suggested it might be a marketing thing on Nvidia’s part, and that makes a lot of sense.

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way I think it, it’s possible a really small number of GPUs would be enough to render the framebuffer, you’d just need an army of low-power graphics units to receive the data and render it on screens.

      Having a high-power GPU for every screen is definitely a loss unless the render job is distributed really well and there’s also people around to admire the results at the distance where the pixel differences no longer matter. Which is to say, not here.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah we should have never invented televisions or records either! And don’t even get me started on cell phones. Just waste waste waste.

      Why, if it were up to me we would all still be hunting and gathering!

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apples to oranges dude, this is for pure spectacle that wears off after five minutes. Plus any data gained from it was at the lab they prototyped it I believe in Burbank. This aint really a sign of progress, and itll be funny to see what happens to it when it inevitably breaks.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its one of the smaller atrocities in Vegas, particularly when compared to the Bellagio Fountain or the food waste generated by all those casino dining halls.