• egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Actually, the tweet is wrong, you can always be getting a result above average in a series of numbers as long as the nth number is significantly greater than the previous ones. For example, f(x) = x^2 would always be above average for every next number

    • lseif@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      if it is considering the average for all of history, then the rate of change would just have to be consistently greater than 0, right ?

  • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So look, guys, it’s reaaaally easy:

    If it isn’t mandated, regulated, and enforced by law, assume the corporation is lying.

    Bonus Wisdom Save: If a corp says you should do something, strongly consider doing the opposite.

    • lseif@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it isn’t mandated, regulated, and enforced by law

      and even then, dont be so sure…

  • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d imagine they include their off-hours in the ‘averages’.

    “So crazy that we’re getting more calls when we’re open than when we’re closed!”

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially if it’s one of those awful ones that are only open for 5 minutes on the fifth Wednesday of the same month.

    • dogsoahC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not necessarily. They could be constantly ever so lightly above the average value, but then once in a while, a really low value comes along and drags the average down. What you’re thinking of is the median.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once a year they receive negative a billion calls on a day that is later erased, and it really skews the average

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the average they calculated they’d get in order to allocate the minimum budget and personnel to what the “normal” calculation would be and only inconvenience the customer when it rose about that amount.

    Not actually the average they get, the average they allocated min budget for normal amount.

  • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The odds of ever needing to call customer service for a product or service weigh heavily in my decision to buy it.

    And every support line needs a “direct to tier 2 support” option. I don’t care if every caller chooses it. If I wanted tier 1 support I would be on the website.

    • cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my company I directly escalate all issues no matter how small. They had to ask me to stop that after I escalated an issue due to an unplugged power cord.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    actually, it is. let me explain.

    Let’s simplify and say that there are peak hours and low hours. 100 people call during a peak hour, and 25 during a low hour. The chance of calling during a peak hour is 80%, since you are four times as likely to be one of the 100 rather than one of the 25.

    The same effect means that you are almost always on planes and trains that are very full, even though every now and then they ride almost empty. Fewer people get to experience empty train rides by definition.

    Of course this effect falls apart when your usage patterns differ from everybody else’s. If everybody takes the train at rush hour, you might ride an empty one at noon. Or, if you call the hotline while everybody else is sleeping, you might have a better chance.

    But yeah companies also just lie to make themselves look better lol

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is why PT is OP. The bigger traffic is - the smaller intervals are.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, this is exactly it. You are calling when other people are calling. You are the congestion.

      If you call before 11 AM you will have a much better time, as will the customer service operators.

      • Hupf@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Soo you’re saying we should increase train frequency for times when they’re empty?

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If that frequency is once an hour compared to once in five minutes, then yes. If frequency is too low, then people are more likely to use alternative transport or not go at all.

    • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      because I call the customer service line of any one company so much, that I have memorized their touch tone menu

      9 months into my daily call to Maytag: Excuse me, babe. I have to walk into the other room so I can listen. Apparently, they’ve changed their phone menu.