• Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, I’m not even going to see it. The book was so insanely good that I cannot entertain the possibility of a movie straying even one millimeter from the source material.

      • underreacting@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know if the same people are involved in this one, but I love the movie version of the Martian - I think it’s a very faithful adaptation, with acceptable changes for the medium. Slightly more grandiose and optimistic ending, possibly to be palatable to a wide audience, but nothing that ruined the experience.

        If it’s even close to that balance of good adaptation and good movie, it will absolutely be worth watching.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Funny thing though, Jurassic Park is STILL wildly successful, and if it had followed the book, most people would have never heard of it today.

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          From what I heard the book had a lot more deep science and chaos theory, but I never read it. If true, nobody’s taking their kids to that.

          • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I read it 3 times. When I was like 12. Chaos theory and science were certainly aspects; aspects of an exciting, edge of your seat, smart, well-plotted thriller, with engaging and relatable characters. It wasn’t a kids book, and doesn’t need to be a kids movie. This may shock you, but movies don’t have to be for kids in order to be successful.

            • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              This may shock you, but movies don’t have to be for kids in order to be successful.

              I’m not shocked, because I never claimed this point at all, but I appreciate your attempt at insulting me for no reason.

              The formula that is Jurassic Park is complicated and has many variables. I’m sure the movie you would have preferred to get would have been great, but it wouldn’t be the universally recognized franchise it is today.

    • EponymousBosh@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Honestly? Gotta disagree. It’s been a long time since I’ve read the book but I remember being disappointed by it after seeing the movie. Maybe I’ll give it a reread and see if my opinion’s changed. ETA: fuck all the movie sequels though, no one needed that shit.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The worst part of all these stupid spin off movies (besides how atrocious I’m assuming they are) is that they significantly reduce the likelihood we will ever get a movie that is faithful to the book.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think since the Jurassic World series started, all of the reboots have mostly been “remember this” from the first movie, and none could really be anything more than that. Every one has to include a scene that’s a homage to the original. Honestly feels like the franchise needs to have a genre switch up to force it to be something original.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mildly enjoyed that the message of Jurassic World was “This park (movie) is a soulless project that shouldn’t exist and only props itself up on increasingly mindless spectacle.”

        • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Okay, okay, hear me out. What if we, and stay with me on this, mix the DNA of two monsters dinosaurs together? Crazy right?

          Ctr-c

          Ctr-v four times

          Print

    • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      to 4yo me, JP was a horror film. I mean, the kitchen sequence alone. And the run underground in the dark in search of the fuses, only to find a severed arm.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not a movie, but I don’t know what they were thinking with that ‘adaptation’ of Pratchett’s Night Watch books with ‘The Watch’. It was wrong on every level. That said, taken on it’s own merits, the production design was kind of awesome, and the guy playing Vimes was great.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fuck I wish someone would actually do a show about the night watch and do it justice.

      Also a theif of time movie as good as the hogfather

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I Am Legend

    The ending was completely and utterly different than the book, which destroyed the gut punch at the end of the book that was kind of the whole theme of the book.

    I don’t even remember the book as a whole. But I remember the ending. Then they Hollywooded it and it was awful.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The Lawnmower Man

    In the book, an unassuming everyman stumbles upon the fact that a local landscaping company is actually a front for a demon who has an arrangement that involves making human sacrifices of those that discover his supernatural nature.

    In the movie, a Cyber Virtual Reality 3D Battles ON 3D CYBERSPACE Stunning Effects 3D Internet Pierce Brosnan Warfare Nineties Futuristic VR Headset Technology BATTLE In 3D Mind Expanding Guns, and one of the characters is a man who has a lawnmower.

    Edit: Shit, okay, I just read this on Wikipedia and nearly wet myself:

    A feature film, The Lawnmower Man, starring Jeff Fahey and Pierce Brosnan, was released in 1992 by New Line Cinema. This film used an original screenplay entitled “CyberGod”, borrowing only the title of the short story. The film concerns a scientist, Dr. Lawrence Angelo (Brosnan), who subjects mentally challenged Jobe Smith (Fahey) to virtual reality experiments which give him superhuman abilities. The film was originally titled Stephen King’s The Lawnmower Man. King won a lawsuit to have his name removed from the film, stating in court documents that the film “bore no meaningful resemblance” to his story. King then won further damages in 1993 after his name was included in the home video release.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Stephen King - Dreamcatcher

    In the book the character Duddits had the shining, yes that motherfucking shining.

    In the movie they made him an undercover alien. Man what a let down.

  • xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ready Player One. So much about the movie adaptation of this book infuriates me, but the fact they replaced Wargames with the Shining is a crime against humanity!!!

  • JPSound@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Literally everything about World War Z. Absolute travesty. The book is a unique and genuinely thought provoking new take on the zombie genre. The movie is an insult to every bit of world building Max Brooks created.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I say this to people and then always have to clarify:

      It’s not that the World War Z movie is a bad adaptation of the book, it’s that it’s NOT an adaptation of the book at all. Other than the name, and the fact that it has zombies, there are literally no similarities between the book and the movie.

      The characters are different, the settings are different, the format is different, the plot is different, the way the zombies act is different. Literally EVERYTHING.

      Calling it an adaptation is like if you took The Neverending Story and changed its title to The Lord of The Rings and called that an adaptation.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, this one is the big one.

        I feel like World War Z would have been better adapted as a TV show given that the book was episodic in nature.

      • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I read somewhere that this is basically Max Brooks’ take on the film.

        Something about breathing a sigh of relief when he read the script, because it was such a distinct story that there was nothing left of his book to be butchered.

    • SEND_BUTTPLUG_PICS@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought the movie was pretty enjoyable but it shouldn’t have been named after the book. It would have been a decent zombie movie on its own.

      • JPSound@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree. Its a fun movie but is the literal opposite of everything in the book. My favorite chapter is where the crashed pilot outwalks the group of zombies. There’s something so organic and absolutely terrifying about that. Humans are persistence predators and it was such a unique way of turning the tables on our evolutionary successes. Brilliant stuff. The movie may be fun, but its anything but brilliant.

  • 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    tv series rather than film but: The Dresden Files

    worst change? everything

    harry’s staff – carved from a lightning struck tree from the property of his mentor, iirc, and carved with various runes – is replaced with a hockey stick

    bob the skull – a constructed sprit of intellect bound to a skull – is now a ghost of some guy

    they made lt murphy a brunette

    probably more idk I didn’t get more than an episode in and that was years ago

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know we’re not into Harry Potter now, but the past is the past and I can’t forget how annoyed I was when the movie based on the third book, Prisoner of Azkaban, came out. I was a very disappointed teenager.

    It was a whirlwind story to me at the time. I remember exactly where I was when I read it, as the moment that revealed the friendship between Harry’s father James, Professor Lupin, Peter Pettigrew, and the alleged-murderer, Sirius Black, became seared into my brain. It was such a pivotal part of the overall story to me, that that twist alone made it my favorite in the series. So when the movie came out, I expected the use and development of The Marauder’s Map to be a key highlight. It was a huge deal in the books, after all.

    Yet in the movie, the map is just a neat thing Harry gets to use. Nobody mentions that Harry’s own father helped create it. The movie never even tells who the Marauders are, even though the reveal of their backstory was the key emotional crux of the Shrieking Shack scene. To omit their story entirely felt like a gut-punch.

    I didn’t understand at the time why the director (Alfonso Cuaron) decided to straight-up change everything that made that story so compelling to me and my friends. To this day, I still don’t understand.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yet subsequent movies mentioned the nicknames Wormtail and Padfoot. A lot of things in the films must have been confusing to people who didn’t read the books. Another weird thing I’ve noticed is that in the fourth movie, Barty Crouch Jr steals from Snape to make polyjuice potion and he blames Harry. But those who only watched the movies and didn’t read the books wouldn’t have known that Harry and his friends stole from Snape to make polyjuice potion before.

  • tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe not the worst, but this one’s personal: Edge of Tomorrow’s take on the fantastic All You Need Is Kill (spoilers ahead).

    • Making the movie PG-13. In chapter 2 of the manga, there is a brutal death scene showing how Keiji can’t escape the Mimics wherever he goes. The series was quite bloody, and used that to its advantage.
    • Casting Emily Blunt as “Rita Vrataski”. One of her defining character traits was that she was unassuming, and that you wouldn’t expect that level of combat skill from her appearance.
    • While Keiji was in love with “Rita” in the original, it was unrequited–the change felt actively detrimental to “Rita’s” character.

    SIDENOTE: I feel like changing this was sort of unimportant, but you’ll notice I’m using quotes for “Rita”. That’s because, in the original, her real name is unknown. She took someone else’s identity.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      To be fair, I wouldn’t expect an elite combatant when I look at Emily Blunt.

    • audaxdreik@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Surprised to see this one here, but this is also my answer. Been awhile since I read the book, but I seem to remember the other big point being the whole blood transfusions thing from the movie wasn’t there, that was all made up bullshit. In fact, “Rita” had not lost her power, they were going through overlapping loops which is so much cooler, but I guess was deemed too confusing for audiences so we got that schlocky Hollywood ending instead.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I did not know the movie was based on anything. It’s one of my favorite scifi flicks, I always viewed it as based on a game player’s grind to get through a game by trying different moves after each death to succeed.

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    TV adaptation of Wheel of Time was just fucking awful. Like every stupid character change and story change was done literally as stupidly as possible and seemingly with a view to ruin the actual story as it was written.

    I genuinely think the showrunners hadn’t read the series to the end by most of the changes they made and canned it when they caught up and realised how much they had fucked the story that was still to come.

    Book and TV spoilers

    Tower in exile run by Siuan mentoring Egwene who is aes sedai by virtue only of being elected Amyrlin? Nope, Siuan is dead and Egwene was made Aes Sedai so I guess that arc is dead.

    Moiraine thought to be dead and later rescued from the tower of Ghenjei by Matt and Thom? Nope, she never got “killed”, and never went through the doorway.

    Min, Elayne and Aviendha all accepting the situation and bonding with each other as sister wives and sharing the bond with Rand through their own connection? Nope. Min is shacking up with Matt (maybe? Either way doesn’t gaf about Rand) and Elayne and Aviendha are shacking up with each other instead.

    Having Rand kill Turak with the power instead of entertaining his challenge was a little funny but completely outside of both Rand and LTT’s code of honour and especially LTT’s massive ego.

    The first one that me swear out loud was killing Uno and making him Gaidal Cain. Like… I guess Uno won’t be leading armies in the last battle then, and Birgitte won’t be wondering where Gaidal was woven into the world as a young child…

    Oh god I forgot they gave Perrin a wife and had him kill her for literally no reason…

    So many stupid changes made for no conceivable reason. Not little things to make a character easier to write for TV or more relatable, but sweeping giant story changes that make great chunks of the original canon impossible.

    I genuinely implore anyone who even got the slightest amount of joy out of the show to read the books. Learn the original and really very good story, and experience Jordan’s writing, rather than Judkins’ made-up-as-they-went-along shit erroneously accepted as passable work.

    • Breezy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just finished reading the books. But i started book one and season 1 together and quickly saw they were completely different. But i watched the show first and it cemented how characters looked which is what i wanted before i read it.

      After finishing all 14 and now on new spring im glad the show gave me direction to imagine a lot of them.

      • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah the casting and costuming was pretty good for the most part with the very slight exception that I felt Rosamund Pike was a bit tall for the diminutive Moiraine. Apart from that I loved how faithful they were to the characters’ descriptions even if they did go wildly off the rails with the story.

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I read the books and liked the TV version. They were just different things. I am not sure I’d even enjoy a very faithful TV adaptation.

      • syreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well it got canceled due to poor viewership so they failed and made it even less likely a fair adaptation ever gets made. Everybody loses.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          True enough. I do not like their Tolkien fantasy series, it’s clunky in some way, or the actors are not right, something is off. WOT, I quite liked most of the casting, loved the sets and landscapes and costuming and took the edits in stride, thought of it as an “inspired by”.

          My hope would be an animated series.

          And as a William Gibson fan, oh I am used to disappointment.

          • syreus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And they did the right thing by calling it Rings of Power and treading new ground instead of warping old stories.

            That’s what they should have done with WOT.

            “Another Turn of the Wheel” where we see a group of young people mentored by a grizzled Moridin(see where I am going here) after their village is raided by Trollocs that haven’t been seen for 500 years.

            I would watch that even after seeing what they did to WOT.

  • Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The color from outer space.

    It wasn’t glowing purple. It was closer to a dull grey.

    I’ll give them a pass because it’s hard to film lovecraft books. How do you film a new color no one has seen before? Or monster that drives you crazy just to loook at?

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel like Annihilation ended up feeling more like a film version of Colour Out of Space than the COoS film did.