Why on earth do you think not being listed in a particular document makes something not a human right

The entire planet understands what ownership means you are basically alone in misunderstanding

There are many birthright citizens of all ages not just infants. They would instantly become homeless and destitute in a country where they may not speak the language and have no proof of citizenship even if they may eventually have some due to them eventually.

Furthermore this is a vehicle to deny them other human rights by selectively removing people who are entitled by our constitution to citizenship for speaking against the government.

Right of redress assembly speech to be secure in their person , and to be subject to the law not a ruler are all important rights herein denied.

Why would I define human rights by virtue of what a wiki says today?

If I own something I can put it to any lawful use without restriction or compensation. Neither taxation nor seizure for failure to pay taxes are anything like ownership.

Your mental picture fails to encompass the nuance which indeed isn’t particularly subtle.

I don’t think voting implies content. People continue to consent with some laws out of moral duty others because they like life outside of a cell.

I feel like this is both correct and opens a hole in most vampire films. Vamps should have been burning down homes to get at the people.

I think that they wouldn’t be able to enter regardless of whether someone was home and they would know when they noticed they couldn’t do so.

Ability to tax isn’t ownership

Ability to seize isn’t the act of seizure nor by that definition is any land owned because most everything has been taken by force at some point.

Renting wouldn’t change anything unless they got permission from the owner.

He won because he can delay actually following the law until he’s dead because it will be impractical to stop him

Human rights are those required for human dignity and flourishing not those which are universally possessed in a world full of distress and toil.

Freedom of speech is one such commonly understood but often denied. For instance if the content of your speech can see someone removed from the land of their birth to one where they are stateless and homeless what other rights do they possess?

Sharing a world with another term with less precise meaning is a bug not a feature

The first link doesn’t work the second is twitter. The third didn’t appear to contain the stats you cited.

I remember the last time it was run. It’s why we got president Bloomberg. Oh wait. Why would he actually reference Bloomberg himself whilst suggesting this? Did he just forget exactly how badly this worked?

There are plenty of schools in Europe. There is no reason for essentially the equivalent of 1930s Jewish people to study in essentially Hitler’s Germany in the 30s right when the smarter people were getting out.

shut up

You don’t have the alternative to go into other people’s country and round up people because people will absolutely shoot any such folks then drop bomb’s on your cities and forces. It’s not my fault you are confused about what the options are.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/21/middleeast/iran-nuclear-sites-hit-us-explainer-intl-hnk

They are enriching uranium to 60% Note CNN isnt the only source for this.

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/conversion-enrichment-and-fabrication/uranium-enrichment

They need 3-5% for nuclear power

What do you think they are doing. Experts say not that they aren’t working towards the appropriate tech but that they aren’t close.

You listed all sorts of sources but cited specific statements do you could borrow the appearance of expertise while putting your statements in their mouths.

For instance I looked into the iaea I could find no statement to the effect that they aren’t working towards nuclear weapons. They would in fact be stupid not to.

As far as I can tell you are confused. I look forward to your detailed sources and reputations

They can stop enrichment of uranium any time it’s not even the only choice for nuclear power and they long surpassed the target they need to generate power. They ARE trying for nukes just aren’t close due to first negotiations then sabatogue and murders.