• Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    applicants for several kinds of student visas would be required to "adjust the privacy settings on all of their personal social media accounts to ‘public’

    They are so ridiculous.

    But ofc it’s not going to happen. They can lick my.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It already is happening. Source: a person getting a visa now-ish.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    People are missing the point here. Its not about this being a valid strategy to catch anyone but its a fascist strategy to display who’s in control over you when you come here.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      … but isn’t Lemmy social media? And you’re here. (Although I guess it is more accurately called antisocial media)

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lemmy is social media, but when people say “social media” they’re typically referring to one of two things. They either mean all social media including legacy forums or they mean media that is directly tied to their real names.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lemmy also can’t be used non-publicly so a pointless distinction considering the context.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you loosely follow the definition of social media to mean “Website where you can interact with people in any way” then yes.

        But I think the average colloquial use of the term social media really refers to websites where you make a real life personal profile and share things on that profile. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc. You as the individual are the focus of those types of sites.

        The (original at least) point of sites like Lemmy and Reddit is sharing information where you as an individual are not the focus. Hence posting to communities rather than your own wall or profile, the use of usernames over real names etc.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve heard social media where you interact with strangers instead of “friends” referred to as “antisocial media”.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think Lemmy would count as social media but that said, you can easily create a dummy account that just, for example, posts pictures of moths or beans or bread or whatever.

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you say that you have no social media accounts they will probably assume you’re lying and deny you.

          • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Closer to forums than IG. Anything old school deserves to not be bundled in with the rest of “social media”, so in that regard I get it. We still have handles though.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s so sweet that we want to act like anyone cares about our Lemmy history.

            I mean if there was anyone harasses IRL for posting here, hit me up with a link.

            But comparing Facebook to Lemmy is kind of funny.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They say they will find those “with AI”. And they will, for true or for false, because they only want another weapon to use against the “undesirables”.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “What do you mean this 5 year old account has no posts?”

      “Work made me get one, but the UI gives me headaches. I think it gives everyone headaches really.”

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ah damn, I was a state actor who was going to smuggle in sleeper agents to perform sabotage and espionage in the US, but I can’t figure out how to create a fake social media profile. I admit defeat.

    • m4xie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      At least you’re not a teenager that has ever expressed any sympathy for Palestinians. Those are the real threat.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You know, when I got my current job, the people in my department said"we tried to find your Facebook but couldn’t" and I said 'yeah that’s because I don’t have one."

    13 years later, still don’t.

    Though honestly even our work teams chat would probably be too spicy for these motherfuckers. They just want a pretext to keep out anybody. Like some law impossible to follow, that they can selectively enforce.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I question this, and really, their availability.

      With prep-time, any prosecutor and crew could dig up every tiny detail about you in about a week, including every single site any related IP addresses to you have been to and how much time you spend there and all of your dns queries.

      But here, on the spot. “You tell us”.

      Their lack of effort is correlated to the amount of spite they have for any individual person. It’s like using a magnifying glass. If they actually gave a shit, they wouldn’t have to ask.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Honestly speaking I see a future where people like us are left out of an integral part of the economy.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Many jobs will already disqualify applicants if they don’t have any social media, or refuse to provide account names. The rise of cancel culture means many businesses are extremely risk-averse, and don’t want any employees who are prone to posting inflammatory things.

      • Hobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m gonna go out on a limb and say if a random immigration official knows about your anonymous lemmy account you were already mega-fucked on the immigration front. They’ve been watching you and probably have a 3 inch thick file on you before you walked in the door.