Just drink Lion’s Mane tea, probably much cheaper
Just drink Lion’s Mane tea, probably much cheaper
PSA: qBittorrent has a search function, no need to go to sketchy mirrors anymore.
But the picture I saw said “get this app from play” not, “get this app from a trusted store”. That to me does not read DRM.
Isn’t that a textbook monopolistic practices lawsuit?
So, 24 years ago? If so, I’m right there with you in the “getting old” camp.
Now give us DirectX on Linux
I mean, driving a car is dangerous, everything has a risk inherent to it but you can minimise it by being prudent.
I used it to connect a generator to the wall and give me some temporary power in my house when I was renovating. It’s only dangerous if you are stupid.
Yes, i saw that, I was troubleshooting it for a while and when I got it to run the performance was ass but today I tired again and basically the problem is that the game must absolutely not be run from and HDD. It’s running fine on linux now.
I’m really enjoying my Mint 22 experience, the only downside is that I have to switch to windows to play Once Human.
AI to summarize and recommend content, helping users dive deeper into products, shows, games
Notice they don’t talk about hobbies or common interests, just “shit we can sell them”
They could make a system that doesn’t allow the vehicle to speed but I guess allowing it and then snitching is better
They’ll remove any mice from the market that doesn’t have a subscription model and others will follow suit.
Good luck with removing aliexpress mice from the market
He can kill them all and declare it an official act
The curl command is a hacking tool for copyright infringement.
When the web pages are called up by the web browser, the HTML file is transferred to the RAM on the user’s device. To display the HTML file, the web browser interprets its content, creating additional data structures. The plaintiff sees the influence on these data structures by the ad blocker as an unauthorized modification of a computer program
This has to be the most idiotic thing I read this week.
But that is not what the bill says, the reasonable person is not evaluating my intent, it’s evaluating if the video is “indistinguishable from an authentic visual depiction of the individual” which in this case it would be very distinguishable since the individual does not have said face tattoo.
So if I make AI porn of a celebrity but give her a face tattoo saying AI generated then its legal?
Not sure. My significant other used to follow football games on there while I was watching them live because she felt it help her understand what was going on. From what I saw it was good at having quick updates, but terrible at relaying accurate information. Mostly just dumb opinions that were proven wrong seconds later. It helped her learn people’s names though, not so much anything more about positions, formations, plays, or any kind of strategy. All of the drama with none of the reason it seemed to me, but I was bias I’m sure.
I can relate to that, I normally go to those websites that have the live stats and stuff but I wouldn’t create an account just for that.
Or AZERTY in this case