lemmy.mlaga97.space
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year ago

It could soon be illegal to publicly wear a mask for health reasons in North Carolina

arstechnica.com

external-link
message-square
69
fedilink
0
external-link

It could soon be illegal to publicly wear a mask for health reasons in North Carolina

arstechnica.com

return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year ago
message-square
69
fedilink
It could soon be illegal to publicly wear a mask for health reasons in NC
arstechnica.com
external-link
Senators skeptical of legal trouble for harmless masking after moving to make it illegal.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A bill written by representative I. N. Fluenza

  • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Operating rooms are about to become interesting.

    • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess is Operating rooms would be considered private, but EMTs… They clearly operate in public.

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the one hand, at least the Patriot Front have to show their faces now.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you think this law will apply to their neo-nazi proxies I have a bridge to sell you.

    • niucllos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh ho ho, where have you been that you think they’ll hold their own side to this standard?

  • zcd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Land of the free

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the home of the wage slave

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Land of the free

      You misunderstood, see it was “Land or the free”… and then they took all the land.

      img

      • fah_Q@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Land of the dumb.

    • Matt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      • Freedom not guaranteed. Subject to availability and restrictions at the time of issuance. Pursuant to obligations according to local regulations, your freedom may be more or less than the freedom implied. All rights reserved to freedom issuers. Freedom may be revoked at any time for any reason subject to local availability. Please visit your freedom office to dispute claims. Disputes may or may not be resolved at the freedom offices discretion, with resolutions including but not limited to the loss of additional freedom.
      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Conditions may apply.

        For more information, please reread.

    • MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Free to do what they say.

  • LilDestructiveSheep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bragging about having to wear it. Now banning it. This is insane …

  • tearsintherain@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is even more concerning when you look at some of the motivations: “The bill was largely spurred by recent protests on university and college campuses across the country, including North Carolina-based schools, against the war in Gaza.”

    this is about control, fascism. historically student protests are the canary in the coal mine on a number of issues. powers that be are looking to stamp out any dissent going forward.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s about all of that, but they absolutely could have put in an exemption for medical needs and chose not to. The anti-mask virtue signaling to their plague-ridden base is a bonus.

      • tearsintherain@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is def throwing out meat for the rabid base. Feel like North Carolina is looking to hook up with TX and FL. University of North Carolina to divert $2.3m DEI budget to safety and policing “Some members of the board of trustees, which voted for the divestment, cited students’ recent anti-war demonstrations as a reason for the redesignation of funds to the campus police.”

      • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        kill them all. it’s the only answer

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This legislation proudly brought to you by Sudafed.

  • Anise (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What about as a political statement? Isn’t that still protected speech? You republicans made masking/not masking a political act, don’t blame me.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone should try wearing a “Trump 2024” mask and see what happens

  • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Here’s hoping the language isn’t so ambiguous that hospital workers will have to stop treating infectious people and surgeons aren’t having to consult with legal counsel on whether they can operate.

    In public… meaning public outside and not public areas of the hospital right? Ambulances? Do those count? Etc.

    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s to hoping this aggressively stupid law doesn’t get passed, this is insane regardless.

      • Cybermonk_Taiji@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Removed by mod

  • Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like it would conflict with the ADA.

  • FoolishObserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What about for purely fashion reasons?

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Halloween is going to be interesting this year.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also illegal. Don’t worry though, the KKK is specifically listed as a group that can apply for an exemption. The reason that’s in there is because every version of the bill that explicitly listed the KKK as an organization that can’t apply for an exemption failed. I know this sounds like insane hyperbole and not something that actually happened, but that’s the state of things.

      • Cybermonk_Taiji@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Removed by mod

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Onion can’t keep up with reality anymore

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I’m not wearing the mask for health reasons. I’m cosplaying someone that doesn’t want to get ill from a respiratory communicable disease.”

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Do viruses control our Congress critters like the brain worms do?

    • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I reflexively down vote the term “congress critters”. It is basically the same as the “tea party”. It tells everyone how little you understand things.

      Just a stupid term wielded by folks to eventually let the worst amongst us yield control. Them critters gonna get us! It’s not a system of representative democracy where we elect those to represent us! They are critters!

      They’re just a bunch of critters! Not people, not criminal actors, just a bunch a squirrels!

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I reflexively downvote anyone who types the word “downvote” into their comment. It typically reflects how much of a bitch the commenter is.

        • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cool. Good for you. Substance matters how?

          • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            On a side note, you need more beets and less Schnapps.

        • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a similar rule about people who say “updoots”

        • Cybermonk_Taiji@r.nf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Removed by mod

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, RFK accidentally revealed he had a brain worm when his died and he regained control. I’m sure his goa’uld will be replaced soon.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a stupid fucking rule, guess immunocompromised people are just supposed to die?

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is how you sue dumbasses who pass this law

    • Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the article it says that immunocompromised people spoke during the public comments on the bill and Republican senators said that the bill would criminalize their wearing masks but they just won’t be prosecuted for it.

      • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        AKA you’ll be removed from the voter pool of you wear it.

      • irish_link@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So instead of just having cancer, you’ll have cancer and be a criminal.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a much smoother way to become a criminal than by committing an actual crime, kinda convenient.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Translation: don’t worry about it if you are a cishet white Christian.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like Florida’s law about Mexicans, and then poof, all the Mexicans left Florida.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the law would demand it, but the “trust me bro, I got yo back” defense says to ignore what the law actually says?

        Okay, I think I will.:-P

        • BajaTacos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty sure a SCOTUS justice said that they can’t trust prosecutors to not do this just a month ago.

          • OpenStars@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, that’s just simply not how laws work… and even if they did, for a time, people could forget and prosecute later, bc that’s what the law says to do.

          • woop_woop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think I missed that one. Got a case name for it?

            • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Trump v. United States

              https://archive.org/details/CSPAN_20240428_171000_Supreme_Court_Hears_Case_on_Fmr._Pres._Trumps_Immunity_Claim/start/3960/end/4020

              https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2023/23-939_f2qg.pdf

              CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Well, that’s what I – I mean, shortly after that statement in the court, that – court’s opinion, that’s what they said, but there’s no reason to worry because the prosecutor will act in good faith and there’s no reason to worry because a grand jury will have returned the indictment. Now you know how easy it is in many cases for a prosecutor to get a grand jury to bring an indictment, and reliance on the faith – good faith of the prosecutor may not be enough in the – some cases. I’m not suggesting here.

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                What a fucking incoherent word salad.

                • datavoid@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  GPT 2.5

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they die, there will be no additional fee.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re fascists, so unironically yes.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If God loved them, he wouldn’t have assembled them all jacked up!

  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have strongly held religious beliefs that compel me to wear a mask whenever the fuck I want.

    • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah… but their religion says that yours doesn’t count and only their beliefs matter.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Rational arguments don’t usually work on religious people. Otherwise there would be no religious people.

      • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny how that shit works…

  • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just in time for the avian flu.

    • Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now that avian flu is available in hamberders, masks only get in the way of eating. So, still irrelevant and illegal.

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@lemmy.world

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 700 users / day
  • 1.76K users / week
  • 4.03K users / month
  • 11.6K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 31K subscribers
  • 26.5K Posts
  • 552K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
    cake
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org