• Rabbit R1 AI box is actually an Android app in a limited $200 box, running on AOSP without Google Play.
  • Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.
  • AOSP is a logical choice for mobile hardware as it provides essential functionalities without the need for Google Play.
  • finkrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is why I cringe at cell phone manufacturers selling cloud and AI features based on phone models because wtf you’re not running that cloud on that handset so why do you gatekeep the product behind that model? It can’t require that many resources, it’s a cloud app!

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It is to make you spend more to buy the better model. If you really want that AI you won’t mind spending a bit more

      • finkrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I know what you’re getting at and this isn’t directed at you and I know this is why it’s done, but the capabilities of the phone don’t have any bearing on the use of the AI so why gatekeep it? It’s a dumb way to make a profit.

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I know. It’s dumb as hell. Just like everything being priced at 4.99 instead of 5.00. people are just stupid and it seems to wprk out for the companies.

  • no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Look I think this little thing is a cool gimmicky thing that is cheap and doesn’t really have any practical application at all… I forgot where I was going with that comment but I guess it pretty much sums up my thoughts.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    •Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.

    All android devices are “emulators” like their hardware isn’t special

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t even understand what the point is of this product. Seems like e-waste at first glance.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s just marketing to be like “look at how capable our AI is with just one button”. I mean if you want to be charitable it’s an interesting design exercise, but wasteful and frivolous when everyone is already carrying devices that are far more capable supersets of this.

  • Zoots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    An app that would require root access to fully operate. It is designed to run and use apps automatically. Large Action Mode, I think. Easiest way to get this out is a standalone device

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I may not fully understand the situation, but AOSP offers an API called Accessability that allows an app to hook and modify how the user interacts with the UI. the best example is probably Talkback.

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s so weird how they’re just insisting it isn’t an android app even though people have proven it is. Who do they expect to believe them?

    • will_a113@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Investors who don’t bother reading past the letters A and I in the prospectus.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The same question was asked a million times during the crypto boom. “They’re insisting that [some-crypto-project] is a safe passive income when people have proven that it’s a ponzi scheme. Who do they expect to believe them?” And the answer is, zealots who made crypto (or in this case, AI) the basis of their entire personality.

    • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      ‘Android’ is a certification with requirements in installed Google apps and homscreen links, so there’s that.

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Their target audience are the most gullible tech evangelists in the world that think AI is magic. If there was a limit to the lies those people are willing to believe, they wouldn’t be buying the thing to begin with.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This will flop though. So will the stupid Humane pin.

        Either there are very few people that gullible or that group isn’t quite as gullible as you think.

    • sickhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s the Juicero strategy.

      “You can’t squeeze our juice packs! Only our special machine can properly squeeze our juice packs for optimal taste!”

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Reviewer proceeds to squeeze more juice out with their hands than the machine managed.

        • quantumantics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m assuming you’re talking about the YouTuber; It’s been since before the pandemic that I’ve watched AvE, what did he do?

          • wjrii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Leaned hard into anti-vax and sympathizing with the Canadian trucker protests, and made it a fairly prominent part of his videos. Not entirely surprising that he held some of the views, but he got high on his own LIBERTARIAN!!! supply and started thinking that if he thought it, his audience must want to hear it.

    • Anamana@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They have thought of a specific design for the device using its own interaction modality and created a product that is more than just software.

      Therefore don’t get why people refer to it being just an app? Does it make it worth less, because it runs on Android? Many devices, e.g. e-readers are just Android Apps as well. If it works it works.

      In this case it doesn’t, so why not focus on that?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          No it’s not. Your Honda has several different computers in it, only on of which is likely to be running Android.

        • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is more like someone offering a “brand new method of personal travel” to replace your car, but it turns out that it’s just an old Honda with only one seat, a fuel tank that only holds 10L, and a custom navigation app. There’s nothing it does that your Honda can’t do better, and you won’t want to replace your Honda with this.

          • Num10ck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            true but we all have tons of successful devices that are secretly like this, smart doorbells and flood lights and watches etc. we also have all seen terrible ones. its the implementation that isn’t magical.

            • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              A lot of those smart devices are nothing but a waste of rare earth elements. I don’t think switching on your lights remotely, or starting your car engine with an app are “features”. This is consumerist bullshit that we can very well live without any meaningful change in quality of life.

              There are disruptors, that truly bring something new to the table, and then you have smart dildos.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why even try to sell me another device though?

        Anything and everything this square does, my phone can do better already and has the added benefit of already being in my pocket and not a pain in the ass to use.

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Because, you know, technological development? Someone has to fund R&D, because it’s not cheap. And in 10 years everyone will have similar ai-enhanced devices. No one thought smartphones will make it back in the days as well. And I’m already looking forward to the time when I don’t have to look down anymore to get information

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            And in 10 years everyone will have similar ai-enhanced devices.

            In 10 years (or actually 0 years because it’s already kinda true) people will have an AI enhanced device… And it’ll be their phone.

            Also, you’re arguing something I’m going to name the inevitability fallacy (for my own amusement). It’s not inevitable that everyone will have one of these particular type of devices in the same way it wasn’t inevitable that everyone would start watching 3d TV in their houses.

            This is just another in a long line of things that supply side economics driven companies are trying to sell us. There’s next to no need or demand for this thing, and there’s no guarantee that there will be.

      • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The point being, they are charging 200 bucks for hardware that is superfluous and low end for an incomplete software experience that could be delivered without that on an app. The question is, are you going to give up your smartphone for this new device? Are you going to carry both? Probably not.

        “It can do 10% of the shit your phone can do, only slower, on a smaller screen, with its own data connection, and inaccurately because you have to hope that our “AI” is sufficiently advanced to understand a command, take action on that command, and respond in a short amount of time. And that’s not to even speak about the horrible privacy concerns or that it’s a brick without connection!”

        Everything about this project seems lackluster at best, other than maybe the aesthetic design from teenage engineering, but even then, their design work seems a bit repetitive. But that may be due to how the company is asking for the work. “We wanna be like Nothing and Playdate!!” “I gotchu fam!”

        To address your point about e-readers, they have specific use cases. Long battery lives, large, efficient e-ink displays, and the convenience of having all your books, or a large subset, available to you offline! But when those things aren’t a concern, yea, an app will do.

        Like with most contemporary product launches, I simply find myself asking, “Who is this for?”

        • HelterSkeletor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          They’ve said they are working on integration with other apps, and have said the ultimate goal is the AI could create its own interface for any app. I dunno if that’s gonna happen but if it did it would be closer to an actual assistant, imagine “rabbit, log onto my work schedule app and check my vacation hours” or “rabbit, compare prices for a SanDisk 256 gig memory card on Amazon, eBay, and Newegg”.

          More than likely it’ll just fuck it all up but that’s the dream I think.

        • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean I have an eReader but most of the time I’m too lazy to go find it and my Kindle app works just fine. I am eyeing those eink phones though…

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s an experimental device and by buying it you invest into r&d. It’s not meant to replace a smartphone as of now, but similar ones eventually will.

          My point stands, because they are offering a completely new (but obv lacking) experience with novel design solutions. What they made is a toy, which is not really unusual for teenage engineering. But if they do as they did with other devices in the past this thing might actually rock in the future. They are not inexperienced and usually over super long support for their devices.

          TE is way older than Nothing and Playdate btw…

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It’s an experimental device and by buying it you invest into r&d.

            This is laughably untrue. By buying this you’ve proven to them that their marketing oriented approach to product development is correct, and that customers will throw away good money on half-designed, disposable shit.

            By the looks of this shitty project, they spent most of their money on design idiots that think they’re the next coming of Steve Jobs, and blathering marketing morons that think if they say AI and “the future” enough that it doesn’t matter that the products they actually deliver are half-done, also-ran, clout-chasing garbage with hardware from the clearance section of Alibaba.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, they’re not.

        An ereader is a piece of hardware that has a distinct purpose that cannot be matched by other hardware (high quality, high contrast, low power draw static content). Some of them do run Android, and that’s a huge value add. But the actual hardware is the reason it exists.

        This is just a dogshit Android phone. There is no unique hardware niche it’s filling. It’s an extremely obvious scam that is very obviously massively downgraded in all of value, utility, and performance by being forced onto separate hardware.

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You know, pairing an LLM with Playright is actually a pretty great idea. But that’s something I can totally roll on my own.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    lol at calling running Android an “emulator”.

    Also don’t they have to distribute the actual code for the OS if it’s lightly altered Android?

    • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      AOSP is fully Apache-2.0 licensed except for the Linux kernel, so only their kernel changes would have to be. It’s also an important reason why Android was/is so successful.

    • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      My understanding is that if you only add modules on top, those can stay closed source. It’s possible the AOSP portion of the stack is still stock and untouched.

      • pacmondo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know, one of the reasons they’re decrying everyone running the APK is they claim they’ve made a bunch of “bespoke alterations” to the AOSP version they’re using

  • Felix@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I heard someone even leaked the apk LMAO that’s hilarious that your 200 dollar product can be literally pirated

  • TomMasz@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So it’s just a single app running on a minimal Android implementation, the AI is done on remote servers and it still gets lousy battery life? Sounds like they dropped the ball on design. Nevertheless, no one is going to carry this that doesn’t already have a phone that can do everything the Rabbit does. It has no reason to exist.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yes, they have came out since this discovery saying that there is no ‘app’ and that the AI computed requests in the cloud.

      These people basically found the connection to the cloud.

      But yeah, stupid product that does practically nothing [that a phone cant].