• Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Additional Links: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-03-hiv-cell-culture-crispr-cas.html

    https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1038161

    “The authors emphasise that their work represents proof of concept, and will not become a cure for HIV tomorrow. They say: “Our next steps involve optimising the delivery route to target the majority of the HIV reservoir cells. We will combine the CRISPR therapeutics and receptor-targeting reagents and move to preclinical models to study in detail the efficacy and safety aspects of a combined cure strategy. This will be instrumental to achieve preferential CRISPR-Cas delivery to the reservoir cells and avoiding delivery into non-reservoir cells. This strategy is to make this system as safe as possible for future clinical applications. We hope to achieve the right balance between efficacy and safety of this CURE strategy. Only then can we consider clinical trials of ‘cure’ in humans to disable the HIV reservoir. While these preliminary findings are very encouraging, it is premature to declare that there is a functional HIV cure on the horizon.””

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    As even the article says, we must be cautious because this is purely in the lab at the moment, but this could be a breakthrough along the lines of antibiotics in terms of doing something about virulent viruses, not just HIV!

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        HIV played a huge part in making societies generally more conservative in the past 40 years or so. Having a cure might start to turn things in the other direction again.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Every science article, every single one. They always make things sound like breakthroughs and I have to come in the comments to find out it’s bullshit or exaggerations. Why?

      • jecht360@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s an issue with media outlets sensationalizing everything. The authors of the study even say that it’s premature to call this a cure in humans. It is a nice step forward though.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The truth is they use this as a way to secure additional funding, or show existing grants that progress is being made.

        Whenever you feel the need to ask why in a capitalistic driven society, the answer usually ends up being: “money”.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Rtfm?

        The headline is clickbait. The article ends with

        “While these preliminary findings are very encouraging, it is premature to declare that there is a functional HIV cure on the horizon,” the researchers say.

        I get more frustrated with articles like this than true clickbait. Here’s a genuine breakthrough in science, in an important health area: we should be excited, happy, inspired. Instead we’re annoyed by a misleading clickbait headline

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Jokes on them, I did not, I just read the most popular Lemmy comment.

      • capem@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        To be fair, every ‘breakthrough’ starts small and takes decades before reaching the public.

        Lithium-ion batteries are my favorite example because we take them for granted but the technology to make them was proven in the 70s.

      • Enkrod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Here’s what’s interesting about this: HIV is a retrovirus. That means it integrates itself in your DNA. This approach edits the virus in your DNA. The downside is that, like most recombinant viruses, hiv mutates often. This would have to be tailored.

    The other, bigger issue is that this only removes the virus in DNA. The virus RNA and packages to turn it into DNA and reinsert it need to be delt with before it can be cured.

    In achieving a true cure, you would have to achieve both steps. Considering our previous success was to off all your bone marrow and replace it, this is a promising approach.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The way I look at it, less than 40 years ago, it was a death sentence. Now it’s a “you can live damn near a normal life and life expectancy”. That is incredible.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Maybe I’m wrong here, but from TV (not the best I know) I thought the pills were so effective you didn’t even need to disclose your status to a sexual partner?

            Not that hiding your status is great either, but from a legal standpoint that’s substantial.