Roku is exploring ways to show consumers ads on its TVs even when they are not using its streaming platform: The company has been looking into injecting ads into the video feeds of third-party devices connected to its TVs, according to a recent patent filing.

This way, when an owner of a Roku TV takes a short break from playing a game on their Xbox, or streaming something on an Apple TV device connected to the TV set, Roku would use that break to show ads. Roku engineers have even explored ways to figure out what the consumer is doing with their TV-connected device in order to display relevant advertising.

  • exanime@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t get it… Wouldn’t it be easier for Roku to just declare bankruptcy and saves themselves the trouble?

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve never given money to roku, and now I’ll never will

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Any company trying to use the HDMI-CEC protocol in such a subversive manner should lose their license to the HDMI standard IMO.

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m mad that they did their broken implementation of sending control codes between devices that never works. I have to disable it on everything so that the correct input gets set.

        And then they are killing the universal remote industry so there is nothing to replace it with.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m sure that a DisplayPort device in a chain can also inject video, but I have to admit that I would kind of like to not have two competing video standards, and my impression is that DisplayPort tends to lead HDMI technically, so…

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            DisplayPort: We have

            • Higher maximum resolution.
            • Better support for higher refresh rates.
            • Multi-stream transport so you can use a single display cable for multiple monitors.

            HDMI: Oh yeah? Well, we have

            • Royalties.
            • Specifications hidden behind contracts.
            • An emphasis on implementing DRM technology that makes it hard to use a capture card.

            Fuck HDMI.

            • halva@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              An emphasis on implementing DRM technology that makes it hard to use a capture card.

              Well, DP supports HDCP too.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You know HDMI is not some big secret they can use it without the license and ship from overseas like 90% of shit shipped from China.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That only works if you’re headquartered in China.

        Not that the HDMI Fourm will stop them, anyway. More likely, the companies involved will want to license Roku’s patent.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        For cheap gizmos I can see a chinese seller getting away with it (rebranding under another weird name like AWOYO or something, in a sea of identical devices under different brand names), but not a large business like Roku.

        • halva@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Funnily enough, Flipper did exactly that and the Zero is still doing fine. It’s a loophole, but it does seem to be working fine-ish.

          HDMI Forum have instead resorted to taking GPU manufacturers hostage because they don’t want any specs leaking, that’s why AMD were denied being allowed to support latest HDMI in their free Linux drivers.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Our TV can fortunately bypass all the “smart” shit, and run like dumb monitor, maybe because it’s an older TV? We use it with an external computer with Linux mediacenter, where we have full control and no adds.
    Would it even be possible to run a new “smart” TV as a dumb monitor?

    We are very happy with our TV, because we can run it as a plain monitor no problem, but it could break.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Would it even be possible to run a new “smart” TV as a dumb monitor?

      Never connecting the TV to the internet and never updating the firmware usually works. If they are determined to show you ads, they may not let you use the TV without an internet connection though. I would suggest that you avoid buying a roku TV.

      • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Okay but they can also mesh the TVs with your neighbour’s tv of the same brand so that if your neighbour’s TV has internet, your TV can leapfrog onto his tv to download the ads

    • eksb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Get an A/V receiver, a computer monitor or dumb TV, and speakers. Then you can get a Roku streaming player and it cannot show you anything when you do not have its input selected on the receiver.

      Even an inexpensive pair of bookshelf speakers placed on either side of the TV will sound better than built-in TV speakers. Add a center speaker and a subwoofer drastically improved sound.

      Non-4k AV receivers are dirt cheap used.

    • HC4L@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      A simple PC, you can also use it to browse, download stuff, Steam stream etc. The possibilities are endless

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Any used office pc from Craiglist for <$200, wiped and reinstalled with linux… self contained mini PC NUC boxes are also a very good bang-for-buck these days

    • crossover@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I run an LG OLED TV (disconnected from network), AppleTV, and my own media server. I haven’t seen an ad in my TV for years.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nothing, all TVs are crap.

      The best options are usually buying large “monitors” or digital signage. However these both tend to be more expensive than a similar TV. Monitors also often lack a remote which may be valuable for a TV and digital signage may have less input ports than you may want.

      I would love if a major manufacturer made a TV that just displayed what signals I put into it.

      Right now the best option still seems to buy a Roku TV and never connect it to the internet. But some features will be disabled. For example Miracast doesn’t work for some explicitable reason until you connect it to the internet. (Then again it barely works anyways, so no major loss)

      • kaitco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Right now the best option still seems to buy a Roku TV and never connect it to the internet.

        No, your best option is to buy any other TV than a Roku TV, and not connect that TV to the internet.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I blocked my TV from using WiFi, but there have been times I have need to unblock it (like using AirPlay or Google Cast), so it gets updates occasionally. I’m open to throwing my TV straight to the dump and buying another TV to avoid this at all costs.

    • ShadowRam@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is nVidia Shield an alternative?

      That’s what I’ve been using for years now. It’s great.

  • DharkStare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That is definitely way too invasive. Plugging something on to a Roku TV shouldn’t enable them to show you ads through that other device.

    I was actually thinking about getting a Roku once too. Really dodged a bullet.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The article says Roku is attempting to detect breaks, which are the only places Roku will try to show you an ad. So you open your inventory in the pause screen to fight a boss and an ad pops out.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s not as bad as Dhark thinks, but still pretty bad. Read my last sentence and fully immerse yourself.

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s absolutely insanely horrible and probably some of the most invasive drm I have ever seen even proposed.

            This would require doing deep analysis on all of the content going through the stream. That analysis sure as hell isn’t being done locally since smart TV’s can barely run their own operating systems, so everything getting offloaded to Roku servers and then they get to put ads on whatever they determine to be an appropriate time.

            This technology enables censoring and blacking out signals that Roku decides you don’t get to see, or preventing the release of the hijacked stream unless you perform certain actions, or just not releasing the stream at all unless you pay, effectively extorting you.

            These cheap smart TVs already give you the worst panels and the worst processors. And now get to be extorted out of your own data being delivered the ten feet from your computer or PlayStation to the TV.

            It’s beyond ridiculous.

      • colforge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I wonder if they’re prepared for Microsoft’s lawyers to come knocking when they find out their screen space is being highjacked by another company for profit…

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It slowly dawned on video game developers that a lengthy loading screen was actually just an wasted opportunity for a digital billboard.

  • andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Used to recommend Roku to others. I will never buy anything from them or recommend them to anyone again.

    Someday maybe boards will figure out that “business” people have no idea what they are doing.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They know what they’re doing! Maximizing share price for the next quarter while they jump ship… It’s legitimately disgusting.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Boards only understand “line go up” or “line go down.” If something turns off a few weirdos like us but it lets them sell access to millions of eyeballs they’ll do it.

      They’d step over their own dying mother to make a buck.

      • digdug@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, if she’s already dying, what’s the issue here? I’m losing money if I have to stop and call 911, when she has a perfectly good phone to do it herself.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        History is littered with companies that decided they should “milk” their customers instead of providing new and innovative products. They usually don’t last all that long, but you’re right that the current board members might not gaf about any kind of longer term existence.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That may have been true in the past, but we’re in a corporate fuedal system now, with a bunch of little fiefdoms we can’t escape ruled by people who wish they had the rizz of Henry VIII or Louis XVI

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve always found their monetization strategy icky. Their remotes, with streaming service ads on them, always made me feel gross. Especially since those services change every couple years, and you get stuck with remotes plugging stupid services like Blockbuster and Redbox.

    • InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, this is just a patent, not Roku saying they will do this. But if they do, then absolutely.

    • Entropywins@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It sounds to be the situation but I wouldn’t put it past them to try and fuck everyone who owns their devices not just people who bought roku tvs

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      For now, yes. The patent discussed in the article suggests that the Roku TV reads the input HDMI signal even if you aren’t using a Roku App to determine whether you are idle and show ads when the screen doesn’t change much.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Roku is pretty great for what it is, but the day I see such an ad is the day it hits the bin. That would finally bother me into driving the TV with an actual PC.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s limited to 720 unless your entire playback system end to end is fully drm secured… this means hdmi certified devices only, single monitor, running unmodified, legit windows. It’s extremely restrictive and even the tiniest system change (like adding a second monitor, or using the wrong cable) almost always breaks it.

        Streaming is a cancer.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not sure. These old eyes can’t see the difference and I don’t own 4k hardware. It is possible that you need a locked down system for some content levels.

    • andyburke@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      As a former Roku fan, forced arbitration or a brick was the breaking point. Roku can fuck off.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Forced arbitration is a cancer and should be illegal, but at least it’s useful and technically my 5 yo agreed to it, so how is this legal again?

  • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is there an anti-ad community on Lemmy? Or another non-Lemmy place to work through blocking/avoiding this bullshit? I’m so fed up with the advertisement industry. I don’t want ads on my devices. I don’t want ads in my operating systems. I don’t want ads in my content. I don’t want ads in the sky. I don’t want ads in the ocean. I don’t want to be forced to see or hear ads while putting gas in my car.

    I really can’t emphasis how much I am willing through to rid my life completely of advertisements.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        That only works while this is still a niche use case. Just wait until they find out how many more places they can shove ads while we are forced to stand/sit somewhere for 20 minutes!

      • ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Dammmn that takes me back! I had a subscription to their magazine in high school in the early 2000s. HOLY CRAP they’re still selling the Corporate America flag too!

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I already have Pi-hole with a bunch of additional lists to be blocked. I also cancelled all streaming services that service ads, and I use Adblock. I still see ads occasionally. What do you suggest for dedicated ad-blocking hardware?

        Also, I don’t know what to do about the environmental ads.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Make sure you’ve got rules set in your router to redirect Roku’s hardcoded DNS to your custom DNS service.

          Some ads can’t be eliminated - for example, if a service delivers ads through the same content servers that the show/movie is coming from.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Roku’s current only saving grace to me is that I can block their shit conveniently. All my Rokus are on my Raspberry Pi in a special group so I can block specific things.

          • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Custom DNS probably explains how the fucking thing throws a pop-up display informing me that I can watch the movie I’m watching using their Roku app instead if I want to. I was wondering how it knew the name of the movies I have been watching, lol. I will probably just go and reset my WiFi password on my router and 50+ devices, or rip the WiFi antenna out of the TV, not sure which yet.

        • LrdThndr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You are a fucking hero. I couldn’t figure out why my Roku TVs were still able to get ads after blocking everything.

    • yuriy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      If the gas pumps have those unlabeled buttons around a screen, try pressing all of em. The pumps around here (nebraska) will mute the audio when you press one of the buttons, it just isn’t labeled. I’ve taken to writing “mute” on the magic-button with a sharpie whenever I pump my gas.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve tried pressing every button at every pump I’ve used in my area and this trick doesn’t work. I want to epoxy the speakers and screen and glitter-bomb the entire thing.

        I won’t. But I want to.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sometimes it’s multiple presses. Around here for example I find that at my local Shell station it’s the second button down on the right side, two or three times.

          • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I really can’t afford to commit a crime by damaging the pumps, but if I found a way to temporarily disable them I’d be all for it.

            • yuriy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I reckon you could kill it with a pin in a casual enough way, maybe make it look like you’re just putting a hand there to lean? Also you have like 4 other people come throughout the day and get gas at that same pump, and they do a similar casual hand movement around the speaker.

              You’d be safe as houses, probably!

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Definitely had to resist the urge myself a few times to jam my keys into the speaker when the mute button method didn’t work.

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Years ago I was talking to some engineers at one of the main gas pump manufacturers. They were venting about their company’s partnership with Verifone. While they used to handle credit card reading themselves in the magnetic stripe days, the switch to chip credit cards and readers in the U.S. meant they were going to partner with an established card reader company and Verifone (at least at the time) was the largest and most established in the new chip technology. Verifone was dominating the partnership and making life difficult for the gas pump company, insisting on all sorts of changes to the devices that weren’t necessary for the gas pump but were going to let them do things like run ads at the gas pump. If the pump manufacturer didn’t go along with it, Verifone seemed to have a very credible threat that they were just going to leave and go to the other main gas pump manufacturer. The gas pump companies needed the card reader a lot more than the other way around.

          So, these ads have been a long time coming, but it wasn’t the pump manufacturer that had the idea or wanted to do it.

        • yuriy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yep. Just shell stations around here (so far at least)

          They’re super loud and in my experience usually political, think local office smear ads and oil lobbyist propaganda.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well yeah how else are they supposed to make money? /s

          Yeah no it’s real and it’s bullshit. They also have ad signage, but that’s been around my whole life, it just keeps getting worse constantly. I remember boycotting the first company to have gas ads, now I don’t have a no ad choice

      • ralakus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        One of my local gas stations had that to where it was so loud you can here them in the car. A few weeks after they installed them, someone came by with a hand drill and drilled out all of the speakers. Not sure what happened to that hero but we need more people like them.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          While I never condone audio speaker violence, I do want to cheer/salute the activism of the person who did the work.

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m still running an older version of NextPVR with three usb tuners and Comskip.exe - it gets most of the ads out of free to air automatically.

      Ublock origin and / or expressvpn seem to block some ads on the catch up services, but not all.

      YouTube with Ublock origin and Sponsorblock work well.

      Newpipe Sponsorblock fork is good as well.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can’t understand why anyone’s money entitles them to put their mental parasites into my attention space. They aren’t paying me, and I wouldn’t take their money no matter how much they were offering. For fuck’s sake, I don’t even want to experience the offer of money for ad attention.

    • lordmauve@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unless that person happens to be with their dad, that would then require finding their dad. That’s a whole extra person to find. It might be easier to skip straight to finding their dad.