- cross-posted to:
- news@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- news@beehaw.org
LOL the Orange Turd crossed the line a long time ago when he tried to overthrow the government with his MAGAt army.
I’m so sick of the media playing this fucking game.
The media in this country is so infuriating. They asked if we were going to do anything about it, and Bondi says its up to El Salvador. So they asked the El Salvador Hitler, and he says “What am I supposed to do? Its not up to me to make decisions for another country, its a preposterous question!”
Literally EVERY person in the world who could negotiate such a thing was sitting right there in that room, and none of the “journalists” suggested they work it out right now, with the whole world watching.
Yesterday, Peter Navarro was on Meet The Press, and the host never asked him a single question about his primary source for his tariff expertise being a phony expert whose name is an anagram of his own. Its all I would have talked about, but she never alluded to it at all, even at the end when he was blathering on with weird insincere flattery of the host (I got the idea that that’s how he addresses HitlerPig). The guy is a total fraud, and yet he is in charge of our disastrous tariff strategy, and she can’t ask him a single question about his obvious fraudulent qualifications on the subject.
The journalists in the White House Press Corps, and hosting shows like Meet The Press, are supposed to be the top journalists in their proffession, but they treat their jobs as if their only responsibility is to provide a platform for the worst people to present their propaganda as Truth, without any questions.
“If that’s not the crisis, nothing is,” he closed.
The writer’s almost there: nothing is.
He was openly threathening US people, or “dissidents”. So he is basically saying in between lines, that if you rise against him, he’ll do very crazy things. This makes me hope for a Quick removal of the rot.
Everyone’s waiting for someone to do something about this problem but no one seems to know what to do about it or are openly cheering it on.
Then they elected him again. Fucking leopards I tell ya.
Will things ever go back to normal?
Societies change, as often for the worse as they do for the better. It also depends what you consider “normal”. For many boomers growing up in the 50’s and 60’s this is fairly normal. We’ve used to shoot students protesting an actual invasion against Vietnam.
And then there are still a lot of immigrants here who fled really bad dictatorial shit holes. They look at headlines going “ICE deported 300 people this week” and go “It’s not even a thousand and they were not gunned down in the streets and their families exterminated, what are you complaining about?”. Perspective.
Fight it however you can, or don’t.
No.
I’m speaking as a fairly moderate, average American who’s been around almost a half century.
I am telling you and anyone who reads this, that this is NOT going back to normal. This is going to get worse. I promise you, you all need to understand this thing I’m about to shout here:
NOBODY IS COMING.
If we want to fix this, we have to do it ourselves. And I have very little allusion that liberal, comfy America and the military is going to dream of upsetting their careful balance and privilege, and they will keep their head down and keep working even as their rights are stripped away and nobody can afford food or water anymore without realizing they’re boiled toads.
Buy beans and rice. Save money. Quit expensive habits and get healthy. Update your passport and put some cash and gold aside in case you need to leave and the banks won’t give you money. Maintain contact with people outside the USA in case you need contacts somewhere. I am dead-fucking-serious.
No. “Normal” for the US was the result of you being the only major industrial power that wasn’t flattened during World War II. You maintained your power since then by using the leverage you’d acquired during the postwar years. Now that that leverage is gone, it’s staying gone, since the rest of the world has rebuilt itself.
This is the new normal
no
No. Even if he’s gone, the world is irrevocably changed. We’re all going together on this dark ride. The sooner people realize that, the better. Then maybe something can be done.
Your comment reads as “no, but yes if we fix it” to me. It’s that what you were trying to convey? If not, could you explain a bit please?
By “maybe something can be done,” I just mean something to stabilize us. Something to give us a new normal. But, there’s no going back to where we were at in 2024. The US as a whole is finished and something else will take its place
What normal? The only thing that’s really changed is that the U.S. isn’t masking their crimes in flowery language. It wasn’t that long ago that we were shooting student protestors in campus and segregating our population based on race. We have plenty of experience in illegally removing migrants and have already used concentration camps.
The U.S. might put the mask back on someday, but they’ve been an evil empire for basically their entire existence. It’s unlikely it will change in our lifetimes.
Oh. Okay. THIS is the crisis moment. Sure.
Surely this time people will all get together and walk down to DC and drag his orange ass out onto the lawn. Surely.
Best they can do is applaud AOC and Sanders while they hold a speech.
Our nation still has the delusion of “Someone is coming to save us.”
The American people’s passiveness with regard to “red lines” is about on par with Putin’s overuse of the term. I expect a bit of whining online for 24-48 hours but no meaningful actions.
Mass organizing in the US is logistically difficult, and all our media is owned by people who want to see the protests fail so the coverage isn’t amazing. But we have millions of people protesting right now and the numbers have been growing fast. Protesters have been under threat of arrest and possible death for ages, and they’re opening it up to “get black bagged and sent to tortureville forever”. We have so much working against us even getting resistance off the ground and yeah we aren’t amazing at it, there’s a good chance we can’t pull it off, but we’re trying
Would you rather people stop dissenting online?
If dissenting online makes them feel like they are doing enough to not act IRL, yes.
Revolutions don’t just spontaneously materialize from nothing, they grow from riots, that grow from peaceful protests, that grow from people complaining to each other in social settings. None of the early steps are sufficient, but they are the type of things that are necessary for the end result. There is no world where less dissenting online leads to more direct action.
People dissented online a lot in Russia ten years ago
This guy has no idea what nuance is.
The Boxers lead a rebellion in China and failed horribly, accelerating the very thing they were trying to stop. Guess rebellings is bad too.
What a bad faith argument.
I don’t think it means it is bad, it could just do nothing, but dissenting online is the easiest nothing you could do
This is an example of where it didn’t do nothing, it actually made things much worse.
Dissenting online is, believe it or not, how people become aware of issues and know they’re not alone in how they feel. It’s a precursor to actual events, like we’ve seen.
putin is still in power, so…
And that grew into protests and riots, so… what’s your point?
Hey guys, guess what. Authoritarianism isn’t trivial to beat. All the other authoritarian states in the world aren’t just full of lazy people who didn’t use the one simple trick. Turns out both propaganda works and a lot of people are actually scared of being murdered or sent to a gulag.
But again, you get none of that if you try to skip the first steps.
If the conclusion is that a revolution is necessary then protests and riots are obviously insufficient. Which means that posting is not the correct path, particularly because it seems to be very lacking in building irl community, though it is effective at convincing posters that their engagement is “doing something”. It isn’t, aside from enriching tech oligarchs through their attentional engagement
Reread the comment, because you’ve entirely missed the point.
How many years does online complaining need to take place before we get to uprising? I’m just curious if we should prepare for war yesterday in Canada or next week cause complaining from Americans and not acting has been going on for multiple presidential terms now. I think Cheeto did the uprising in around 4 years if I remember correctly. It was a few groups of Nazis that led the entire thing. Nazis don’t tend to be very smart.
revolutions only come from suffering.
People need to suffer to the point they are willing to potentially lose it all, people have families, they have friends, they have careers and jobs, people need to physically care first.
For some reason nobody understands this today.
Yes, but an entirely spontaneous movement will end up reproducing the dominant ideology in a given society, because the dominant class has the means at its disposal to propagate and reproduce the dominant ideology.
So a revolutionary movement must know in advance what its revolutionary theory is; it must be united around a particular vision of society, a particular theory of revolutionary change, or it will simply reproduce the society that it is acting against.
There is no evidence that this is what is occurring in the United States. Replacing the bad king with a good king will not solve our problems; our problem is that we are ruled by kings in the first place
I feel like that’s unlikely and that a lot of the people dissenting online are the same ones who are protesting, calling their lawmakers, etc.
Also, it’s not like any of the IRL stuff has been effective yet anyway. Online dissent probably gets seen by more eyeballs than any one protest sign or IRL action that doesn’t end up with the person doing it being arrested or killed (and thus unable to continue resisting this administration), so if it really is an either/or situation I think online dissent is more effective than IRL peaceful protest or writing yet another letter to my lawmakers.
That all said, I really don’t think it is an either/or situation, so I think we can and should be encouraging all the kinds of dissent.
No.
When he deports a citizen who is immediately killed in prison, that’s a red line.
And even then only if he’s white, and Christian enough.
These are red lines of unacceptable behavior and policy, not the lines marking when Americans will actually pay attention. And even if what you describe were to happen, all the Trump supporters would just come up with excuses, while others would protest through the usual channels and be ignored.
These are red lines of unacceptable behavior and policy
Oh man, you almost had me there, good one!
Sounds like something the Onion would have put out in their heyday, you know, before the utter collapse of reality.
I don’t think that would do mit either. Not even if it’s a pregnant woman.
It will be deflected, as the prisons fault, and Trump will continue to send pregnant women without a second thought.It’s all boiling a frog. If he did that day one it would be over the line and cause response. Each step along the way that is eventually accepted makes the next step easier, which enables the one after that and so forth. They deported “criminals” not legally in the country with little protest, they faced little pushback when it turned out they weren’t criminals, so they then moved on to those who are here legally. And as this is becoming mundane they’re laying the groundwork for it to be citizens.
The only line they have is what the people will tolerate, and they’re expanding that day by day.
Absolutely, the red line was doing it at all without due process.
You’re going to have to be more specific…
Oh come on! More specific? It’s not that hard. How many red lines did he cross today?
In a true democracy that would be way beyond the red line, but in USA today, this is just another Monday.
In a world with habitual line steppers, we need a Charlie Murphy to “check” them.
When ‘Yes, Prime Minister’ had a scene about salami tactics, it was referring to the Russians invading West Berlin.
It feels far more relevant to Nazi America today than the actual Russian invasion of Ukraine.
What parody are we living in?
And also, the American people don’t actually have a button to protect themselves from the government
I’m crushing your head!
CRUSH! CRUSH! CRUSH!
deleted by creator
Because it’s not actually a democracy.
Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.
McGill professors love warning about red lines from their safe space in a city that’s “just more European”. It’s a gradient, and the US is in between cherry and crimson right now.
No shit. That’s why I voted for Harris
people still absolutely SHOCKED by fascists doing fascism
WE NEED TO POINT OUT THAT THEY’RE HYPOCRITES ON SOCIAL MEDIA, THAT WILL SAVE US!
Man I miss old Looney Tunes.
I went and saw the new movie with Porky Pig and Daffy Duck: The Day the Earth Blew Up: A Looney Tunes Movie and it was pretty darn good.
And listen, I know now isn’t really a good time to watch a movie and get distracted, but it did a pretty good job of distracting me and made my mental health a tiny bit better not having to think about what we’re going through and will be going through.
There’s nothing wrong with taking a little break from reality. You’ve got to let your mind a soul rest for a bit or you’ll just get depressed!
Sadly it’ll be all of us going off the cliff if this shit persists.
Me an European laughs in Bugs Bunny