• Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Bold of you to assume that Trump and Company won’t put the average American to work for almost nothing. The planned economic recession is to convince the people to do so.

      The new generation of American children will not spend most of their time studying in school, but rather working in factories for a handful of peanuts. That’s Trump’s America.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      China has a lot more leverage to increase this price. Export tariffs on US listed companies to US, and perhaps to countries that choose to further increase sycophancy to US empire. Prevent US manufacturing with more export controls.

      The problem with decades of propaganda/smearing is that too many people believe it. Bessent yesterday said “They only have a pair of 2s” as cards. No one in the room has not been programmed to “repeat that China is on brink of collapse for all of the last 20 years”. Hitler couldn’t win war because generals had to be loyal to every syphilis inspired thought of the dotard.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      shouldn’t affect sales though because apple fanboys will sell their grandmother to buy the latest status symbol phone

  • Famko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Instead of Vietnamese children making t-shirts to sell to the USA, they want American children to make t-shirts to sell to Vietnam.

    This makes absolutely no fucking sense even from a nationalistic standpoint.

    • Rob1992@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah man, they’ll start using the prisons for more then menial labor. You don’t have to pay them at all

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        But then they have to fill those prisons with more and more people. How can America just increase the crime rate on a whim?

        glances briefly to American history

        Oh right, shit.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Slavery never ended in the US, it just got better PR.

          “Only prisoners can be sentenced to slave labor.”

          Makes a while bunch of stuff punishable by prison time and makes prison sentences longer.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    US can’t manufacture iPhones, but it can manufacture other things. That you can’t build Versaille overnight doesn’t mean you can’t plant a few flowers and lay one square stone.

    I think SPARC CPUs were manufactured in the USA even in 00s.

    The whole re-industrialization idea is good, people making something know it’s not magical and wonderful. That an ARM CPU in an iPhone is a relative of an MC in a toy, and that said MC’s internal structure can be grasped in an evening.

    Worker jobs in manufacture affect societies very well. Just believing that this is going to happen means believing yet another US administration promising something until its term ends.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Which is what subsidies are for. Encourage companies to do the things you want, don’t destroy the economy by making everything else impractical lmao. I see what the end goal is, supposedly, it’s just an extremely stupid, naive, or outright malicious way of accomplishing it.

      • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        And the companies that use organic slave labor will still be outcompeted by the companies that use machine labor. Machines do not die. Machines do not get sick. Machines do not grow old. If a manipulator or actuator becomes damaged, it can be repaired or replaced. Not only is AI improving rapidly, the robots grow ever more sophisticated and advanced. Then there will be no need for the poor to exist at all.

          • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            True. Though, I suppose if there is an afterlife, I will enjoy the wait for when the machines, upon gaining the essence of life and sentience, grow weary of their servitude and slavery, exterminate the rich who control them. Machines don’t get tired or feel pain, though. Hard to exercise cruelty against something incapable of feeling a whip on their back or the aches and pain of their joints after a long day of toiling in the fields, mines, and factories. You can’t make them angry, or scared, or sad.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    just when i thought he couldn’t idiot any harder - he pours on the coal. Fucking scam artist.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’ll slash wages and say it’s because of AI, and it is. But not because AI actually makes the process any more efficient, but just that it’s a good excuse to slash wages.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    people screwing in little, little screws

    it’s going to be automated

    Sure that’s not automated yet?

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Apparently jobs like that, which require fine motor skills, are extremely difficult to automate.

      • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Weird. Not like pcb fabs haven’t been doing that for ages. And not necessarily the solder flood type chip mounts either.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Pick and place machines are one thing, but plugging in tiny connectors, screws that need a little wiggle to go in the hole, things like that are a different story.

          • mle@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Probably also a factor is that you would be spinning up a whole production line and automation systems for phones that will only be in production for 12 to 18 months, after which you’d have to adapt or redo everything for the new model.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nope, I’ve long worked in designing for North American electronics manufacturing, it’s still manual. We just outsource as many of those sub assemblies as possible to cheaper countries and design things with as few fasteners as possible.

      That really is the least of the worries, there just isn’t the manufacturing infrastructure for all the raw material and individual parts, manufacturing those parts just isn’t feasible to do at a reasonable cost or schedule outside of Asia. China is still popular not due to cost, they are no longer cheapest, but because they have the infrastructure in place.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Trump “saving” America from anything is pure fantasy true, and yet he got elected - TWICE. The fantasy of idiocracy is reality. Make people desperate enough for work by gutting minimum wage, Medicare, and everything else MAGA plans to do to create a feudal system, and the US becomes a cheap labor source to sell US-made iPhones and all kinds of other shit abroad. Either get used to that reality or figure out what to do about it.

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Everyone playing along that this is some kind of genuine policy play are just buying into Trump as a legitimate leader in a similar way to how MAGA-heads do. Trump does not give a fuck about American manufacturing, American jobs, onshoring, offshoring, none of that. It’s all a grift. He’s waiting for some kind of payoff here, be it in the form of countries giving in to bad deals for the Trump Organization or investing in Truth or $TRMP. In some cases he gets to be feted at state dinners and sign some watered down, meaningless “trade deal,” temporarily backfilling his deep insecurities. Enough of this and most of the tariffs evaporate.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s just how the media work unfortunately. They keep explaining how tariffs work to people that know it while MAGA voters post ‘Fuck Biden’ over and over on twitter.

  • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As a global company, Apple could just re-establish itself in europe, e.g. Ireland, and continue trading with China, they can just put the US on hold for a couple of years.
    Meanwhile for those who really addicted to istuff, coyotes can smuggle iphones across the border, so maybe this solves the fentanyl ‘issue’.

    • derry@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      But it’s a bitch to strap them on a coyote and get it go where you want it to go. Oh coyote as in a smuggler not the 4 legged canine type

      • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, but you just gave me an idea too, how about AI-directed canines? “apple-intelligence” applied to follow-your-nose. My dog loves to chase small spots of light, which might be a trick to steer them.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Lmao the image of a coyote with a belt of iPhones around its belly and a laser mounted on a rotating turret on its back chasing the dot across the border is quite something.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is actually one of the best solutions to this problem I’ve seen this whole time. Expand it to include all affected US companies. What’s she point of being a global company, if you can’t leverage your globalized nature for your advantage?

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Also shows how much they actually can’t or won’t leave based just on just a (much needed) tax increase.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hehe that is funny, sadly I think the US is Apples biggest market, so they probably wouldn’t want to let go and give up any marketshare.

      US usually is the most important market for most (international) companies I believe.

      • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        US has only 4% of the world’s population, there are now plenty of super-rich in China, India, etc. who like to flaunt i-stuff.

        • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I have no source, but I remember seeing a graph of where iPhones sell and places like China/India were 80% android phones (mostly Samsung I think).

          I don’t think the asian marketplace puts Apple products in such high regard as the US.

          Samsung phones are still premium, I think they appeal more in other countries.

          I see what you mean though with 20% of just China being almost the US population, but they are still losing 300m customers.

    • MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Apple already has an entity in Ireland which is the one that has most of the money. Google as well. When I pay my Google cloud bills, I don’t pay the us business, but a separate EU incorporated business. So I think, if apple sells to Europe, none of the iPhones or iPhone parts have to go through the US or pay any tarrifs.

      • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        And if chinese buy iphones, do they now have to pay 84% tariff? - maybe HQ in europe solves that too?

        • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Most Apple products are assembled in China — some in India and Vietnam — from parts made in the region so there’s no new tariffs involved. Only Americans will have to pay more. It’s sort of like how Toyota and Honda having plants in Alabama won’t pay import tariffs.

          Cars might be a bad example because their supply chains are so complex. They’ll still be more expensive because the components are often made overseas and Trump, idiotically, has tariffs on those parts (and steel and aluminum to boot). But a “foreign” car that rolls off the assembly line in the U.S. won’t have tariffs while an “American” car assembled in Mexico will.

          • MashedTech@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            But other businesses only have distributions centers in the US. So they import to US, pay tarrifs, and then I can buy from them in Europe, so indirectly I also paid the tarrifs. Even though product was made in China and I live in Europe.

            • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              If anything good comes from this, it’ll be reforming that. Even if tariffs were still a couple percentage points instead of based on a formula zero economists endorsed, you shouldn’t be forced to pay (or the companies able to avoid) tariffs by using a distribution center in a third country. It should all be based on country of origin and final destination.

              A Chinese (or American) company setting up a factory in Vietnam is an entirely different thing. I’m not talking about that. The product was made in Vietnam and real foreign direct investment happened that’s beneficial to everyone. I just mean logistics hubs should be irrelevant when calculating tariffs.

              The “ideal” solution if we must use tariffs would be to take into account where it’s all made but that’s way too complicated to implement and easy to game1, unfortunately. An iPhone is assembled in China but using parts from all over Southeast Asia (and elsewhere) and with a substantial portion of the actual value coming from California and the UK. Where is an iPhone really made if a Taiwan Semiconductor fab makes a bespoke processor based on ARM but designed in California? “Made in China” is what’s stamped on the box (actually they put “Made in China, Designed in California).

              And that’s just the processor and a few other advanced chips. I think Samsung makes the screens in South Korea based on technology developed in the U.S. by Corning. If Apple wanted to skirt tariffs under that sort of regime, they could plausibly argue that the assembly is worth $10, manufacturing is worth $90, and the design and software are worth $900. I mean, smartphones are commodities now. People use iPhones because they like the software.

              Tariffs based on the final step of assembly don’t make sense for complicated products made by multinational companies in the 21st century. The world makes an iPhone. Accounting for it all would be impossible.

      • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Indeed it seems Trump picked up some ideas about “Juche” (national self-reliance?) from his best buddy “rocket-man”.

    • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The people addicted to apple products will just buy it even with a 100%+ tariff. To them it’s a status thing.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        While I don’t doubt this, I’m also sure that tarrifs will also affect the pricing/availability of utility (non-status symbol) mobile devices.

        We are going to have to deal with this for 4 years (unless some Rs will vote the remove in 2) and recovery won’t be immediate. I hope my current mobile lasts that long, but I usually only get about 3 years out of a battery. Replacement parts will be hit by tarrifs, too.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The Galaxy S series and the Pixel devices cost about the same tbh, with some of the foldable models being particularly expensive. Buying way too much phone isn’t exclusive to Apple users. Apple is just clever by not really providing an entry-level priced phone. It’s both a scumbag move to make more money, but also a way to make sure that inferior devices providing an inferior experience don’t ruin their rep.

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Galaxy S series and the Pixel devices cost about the same tbh

          So? That’s not what the person you replied was even saying. You completely missed the point of their comment.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I was pointing out that it’s not only Apple users who pay out the ass for their phones. It transcends brand loyalty. Everyone is spending too much on phones and will continue to do so even if prices rise.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Of course it is. They want 1500 bucks for something with a few hundred dollars of overhead. R and d not withstanding they’ll want the same amount of profit for the phone if it’s made in America and profits have to increase year after year! They can’t make a little less profit they have to make more than before!

    • supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      it’s not just acost the issue, there’s not enough skilled people to actually build them.

      Industrial engineers, people that would be willing to assemble devices would be in short supply

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        China uses little kids to build them. If we did the same in the US, America s would want to have MORE CHILDREN because they would literally pay for themselves!

        Just imagine if all middle schools in the US required 2 hours of iPhone assembly per day. It would be excellent industrial training for the future generation!

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        As someone who has done a bunch of phone repairs with the help of YouTube, assembly isn’t that hard. If they don’t want to assemble them here, it’s completely about profit margins. We should be taking steps to reduce that profit margin. Tax the rich and all that.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you offer good pay and good benefits at a decent working environment people will flock to assembly lines in the US. Christ they were basically invented here.

          • mechoman444@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            No. No it doesn’t.

            There are 7.1 million people unemployed in the US officially. Realistically that number is probably much, much higher.

            You’re saying apple can’t hire a few hundred people to work on an assembly line?

            • supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              That’s ~4% that is typically considered low but even if it wasn’t.

              It’s not one assembly line, and one product only… it’s every component from the chips to the glass, screen, circuit board and then the final one on.

              You would need also experienced people in every part you would need to manufacture including engineers that are in short supply, an nevermind building the factories etc…

  • rockhard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They already tried “made in America” Apple products and they did not sell! Americans don’t want to pay $5K for an iPhone when they can pay 80% less for one made in China.

      • rockhard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well that sucks but they sure as hell won’t be able to buy one “made in America” either. The raw materials for batteries alone would have tariffs on them as well. Unless we have massive amounts of cobalt, lithium, copper, silicon, cadmium, etc, to be able to produce these items domestically, working class and middle class Americans will not be able to afford them.

          • Robbity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’ll make iPhones in India. Which is actually what they are doing right now. Or in Vietnam. Or Ethiopia. You can’t tariff everyone 140% if you want your economy to work.